Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt35r Vs Garrett T04z - Discussion (just Post In This Thread To Create A Database)


Recommended Posts

No time for this atm , being banished to Parks v soon .

T04Z uses T series wheels , P trim T04 turbine and T04R compressor .

I'd go with whatever makes the best innitial and mid range - torque wins races .

Spud out , back soon .

The 1.06 housing is going to be far to large for the stuart hillclimbs and the bitumen sprints. Definetely go the .82 on the GT35 if your serious about these events and are set on only one of those options, even that im thinking might not be as resposive as you would want.

i tried telling him about that exhaust housing choice but didnt want to listen by the sounds of it.

i tried telling him about that exhaust housing choice but didnt want to listen by the sounds of it.

no more like

"GT35R is crap, T04z comes on song sooner"

The 1.06 housing is going to be far to large for the stuart hillclimbs and the bitumen sprints. Definetely go the .82 on the GT35 if your serious about these events and are set on only one of those options, even that im thinking might not be as resposive as you would want.

Richard has the garrett TO4z on his supra in a .82 im pretty sure (not sure if you knew rich) and it was the same response as having the orginal twins setup as a true twin system, not the sequential setup. It wasn't too laggy however that's obviously on a 3L.

Never got a chance to check out his set-up once he got it all sorted :laugh:

Might have to take a stab at the .82 and go from there. (not planning on being up here in NQ for too long so want the car to be good for open circuits in the future)

I am currently upgrading my Single Apexi IHI RX-6 TCW77P25 (makes 300kw on 20psi (lol or 24psi doesnt make any more HP as it cant flow anymore)) and is massively responsive!!! Makes the car very fast around the circuit.

I have gambled and am going for a GT35 .82 rear on a reasonably simple rb26. Will post my results next week. Aim is 350kw on 20psi But I am happy to sacrifice up top for as much down low as possible...

Car is only used for circuit, want to do some hill climbs etc too, which I think I might find it a bit laggy but hell, will soon see....

Michael

Looking forward to the results mate, good luck!

Edited by Tomek
Might have to take a stab at the .82 and go from there. (not planning on being up here in NQ for too long so want the car to be good for open circuits in the future)

Oh ok that's fair enough. On a more open circuit it does open up other choices than our little tight track :laugh:

Oh ok that's fair enough. On a more open circuit it does open up other choices than our little tight track :laugh:

Exactly mate, lol...

Either way should put on a good show for the sprint viewers!

im running a t04z in my time attack GTR... 1 bar by low 4k ish, full boost (25psi) around 5000rpm. With an 8800 rev limit, that gives me a fairly wide power band to work with.

im running a t04z in my time attack GTR... 1 bar by low 4k ish, full boost (25psi) around 5000rpm. With an 8800 rev limit, that gives me a fairly wide power band to work with.

Sounds about consistant with the few I've seen do. A GT35R on an equivalent 2.6 seems to get 1bar by 4000rpm and 25psi around 4500rpmish - so everything seems to happen nearly 500rpm earlier on the GT35R.

Im running a gt35r with the .82 housing, atm i have about 400hp atws running 15psi, its getting re tuned this thursday and i will post up both before and after results. If only you lived closer id let you take it for a drive.

Im running a gt35r with the .82 housing, atm i have about 400hp atws running 15psi, its getting re tuned this thursday and i will post up both before and after results. If only you lived closer id let you take it for a drive.

hey mate..

looking forward to results.

pm sent

Anna (msnismo) just upgraded from a GT3540 to a T04Z (RB25), being built buy dave (T04GTR) this week. I suggest if you're really having trouble deciding that you shoot Anna a PM. :laugh:

Ash was pretty much spot on with his power ranges though... The T04Z will crack 400kw but will be pretty laggy (expect to spend most if not all of your time above 5krpm) and the GT3540 will be more responsive, but you'll have to ring it's neck to get the kind of power you want (don't think you will get it up to 400).

If you're already set up for twins, I would seriously think about keeping it that way. :wub:

I think your a little off on the predictions there, a 35r will make 400rwkw and more on a properly set-up motor... a t04z is only just getting started at that point.

In terms of response, unique1's t04z on a stroker was roughly equivalent to my 35r with std capacity when we were running similar comp ratio's. In hindsight I would have gone a gt30r or similar, the 35r is too laggy to be quick around ahg or similar short tracks where most of the action is.

Let’s compare apples to apples

Garrett GT3540R,GT35R,GT3582R and 56 trim Billet R-GTV

Compressor Wheel

Inducer 61.2mm, Major 82mm.

Turbine Wheel

Major 68mm, exducer 62mm.

Garrett GT3540R,GT35R,GT3582R compressor map

GT35RCompressormap.jpg

Billet S62-GTV (ETT)

Compressor Wheel

Inducer 62 mm, Major 84mm + (ETT)

Turbine Wheel

Major 68mm, exducer 62mm.

Billet S62-P (ETT)

Compressor Wheel

Inducer 62 mm, Major 84mm + (ETT)

Turbine Wheel

Major 74.2mm, exducer 64.6mm.

Billet S62 Compressor map

S62ETTCompressormap.jpg

HKS TO4Z, Garrett TO4Z and Billet Z-P

Compressor Wheel

Inducer 66.7 mm, Major 84mm.

Turbine Wheel

Major 74.2mm, exducer 64.6mm.

Garrett TO4Z Compressor map

t04zcompress.gif

Garrett GT4088R

Compressor Wheel

Inducer 63.5mm, Major 88mm.

Turbine Wheel

Major 77mm, exducer 68mm.

Garrett GT4088R Compressor map

GT4088RCompressormap52trim.jpg

Forget fanciful horsepower figures and try and go fast on the track. You can't race a dyno.

Try a .8x GT30 and a bunch of boost.

I reckon even the .82 GT35R will be too laggy for what you're describing.

T04Z is a 440-450rwkw turbo

GT35 is 350-380 give/take

my GTR made 400kw with a GT35 on BD4's dyno yesterday and we neva got to finish tuning it because we had into fuel problems but i was pretty sure a GT35 wouldnt be able to make 400kw as well untill i saw it with my own eyes

im using a .78 divided exhaust housing and it doesnt have any boost control wat so ever but it does come on boost hard

planing on adding another external gate onto the manifold to help with the boost control

What I find more amazing is that you can push 400rwkw's throught the .78 divided ex housing. I actually didn't think it would flow that much.

Good to hear because I'm putting that ex housing on a dual gate divided manifold and running a 3071 for now (on my sr). Least I know I can throw on a GT35 with that housing (albeit machined out to suit the GT35) without having to get a new manifold made up for a T4 footprint housing.

Might have to take a stab at the .82 and go from there. (not planning on being up here in NQ for too long so want the car to be good for open circuits in the future)

are you coming to SE QLD? As I think (and why I gambled chucking my super responsive apxi turbo) is I think Queensland Raceway will reward HP and a GT35 that is still reasonably responsive and a bigger turbo. Will soon see.... :|

Here is a old dyno graph, crap picture i know, I am not sure of all the mods done to the car but bassically as far as i know its relativley mild. Gt35r, power fc, 600cc injectors, and twin fuel pumps on a near stock rb26

the red line is 15psi and the green is 12psi so i have been told

26112008028.jpg

I will be at a tuner tomorro for a service and a retune.

Edited by el capitan

Here is a few more a bit smaller than the GT35R and Billet R-GTV

Garrett GT30R, GT3076R

Compressor Wheel

Inducer 57mm, Major 76mm.

Turbine Wheel

Major 60mm, exducer 55mm.

Garrett GT30R, GT3076R Compressor map

GT30Rcompressormap.jpg

Billet S56-GT3 (ETT)

Compressor Wheel

Inducer 56mm, Major 80mm + (ETT)

Turbine Wheel

Major 65mm, exducer 56.6mm.

S56 (ETT) Compressor map

S56ETT.jpg

Billet S58-GT3 (ETT)

Compressor Wheel

Inducer 58mm, Major 80mm + (ETT)

Turbine Wheel

Major 65mm, exducer 56.6mm.

Billet S58-GTV (ETT)

Compressor Wheel

Inducer 58mm, Major 80mm + (ETT)

Turbine Wheel

Major 68mm, exducer 62mm.

S58 (ETT) Compressor map

S58ETT.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • This is the other log file, if only we had exhaust manifold pressure - would understand what's going on a bit better   Can you take a screenshot of your wastegate setup in the Kebabtech?   Engine Functions --> Boost Control (looks like this):  
    • You just need a datalogger of some sort. A handheld oscilloscope could do it, because it will make the trace visible on screen, so you can look at the peak, or whatever you need to look at. And there are cheap USB voltage loggers available too. You could get a 2 channel one and press a button to feed voltage to the second channel at points that you want to check the sensor voltage, when you knew what the guage was saying, for example.
    • it's not the issue with making power, it's the issue with controlling boost, and this isn't the first time I've seen a 6Boost having issue with controlling boost down low.   The boost control here looks interesting.   Looking at your logs, looks like it's set to open loop boost control strategy (which is fine). We can see VCT being kept on till about 6600RPM (no issue with that). Ignition timing (I'm assuming this is E85, seems within reason too, nothing too low, causing hot EGTS and boost spiking). There's about 15 degrees of advance when your boost shoots up, however can't be this as the timing isn't single digits. I'm assuming there's no EMAP data, as I wasn't able to find it in the logs. We can see your tuner sets the WG DC to 0% after 4300RPM, trying to control boost.   My thoughts, what frequency is your wastegate set to?  AND why aren't you using both ports for better control?
    • While that sounds reasonable, this is definitely a boost control problem, but the real question is why are you having the boost control problem? Which is why I pondered the idea that there's a problem at ~4000rpm related to head flow. In that instance, you are not yet under boost control - it's still ramping up and the wastegate is yet to gain authority. So, I'm thinking that if the wastegate is not yet open enough to execute control, but the compressor has somehow managed ot make a lot of flow, and the intake side of the head doesn't flow as well as the exhaust side (more on that later), then presto, high MAP (read that as boost overshoot). I have a number of further thoughts. I use butterfly valves in industrial applications ALL THE TIME. They have a very non-linear flow curve. That is to say that there is a linear-ish region in the middle of their opening range, where a 1% change in opening will cause a reasonably similar change in flow rate, from one place to another. So, maybe between 30% open and 60% open, that 1% change in opening gives you a similar 2% change in flow. (That 2% is pulled out of my bum, and is 2% of the maximum flow capacity of the valve, not 2% of the flow that happens to be going through the valve at that moment). That means that at 30% open, a 1% change in opening will give you a larger relative flow increase (relative to the flow going through the valve right then) compared to the same increment in opening giving you the same increment in flow in outright flow units. But at 60% opening, that extra 2% of max flow is relatively less than 1/2 the increase at 30% opening. Does that make sense? It doesn't matter if it doesn't because it's not the main point anyway. Below and above the linear-ish range in the middle, the opening-flow curve becomes quite...curved. Here's a typical butterfy valve flow curve. Note that there is a very low slope at the bottom end, quite steep linear-ish slope in the middle, then it rolls off to a low slope at the top. This curve shows the "gain" that you get from a butterfly valve as a function of opening%. Note the massive spike in the curve at 30%. That's the point I was making above that could be hard to understand. So here's the point I'm trying to make. I don't know if a butterfly valve is actually a good candiate for a wastegate. A poppet valve of some sort has a very linear flow curve as a function of opening %. It can't be anyelse but linear. It moves linearly and the flow area increases linearly with opening %. I can't find a useful enough CV curve for a poppet valve that you could compare against the one I showed for the butterfly, but you can pretty much imagine that it will not have that lazy, slow increase in flow as it comes off the seat. It will start flowing straight away and increase flow very noticeably with every increase in opening%. So, in your application, you're coming up onto boost, the wastegate is closed. Boost ramps up quite quickly, because that's really what we want, and all of a sudden it is approaching target boost and the thing needs to open. So it starts opening, and ... bugger all flow. And it opens some more, and bugger all more flow. And all the while time is passing, boost is overshooting further, and then finally the WG opens to the point where the curve starts to slope upwards and it gains authority amd the overshoot is brought under control and goes away, but now the bloody thing is too open and it has to go back the other way and that's hy you get that bathtub curve in your boost plot. My position here is that the straight gate is perhaps not teh good idea it looks like. It might work fine in some cases, and it might struggle in others. Now, back to the head flow. I worry that the pissy little NA Neo inlet ports, coupled with the not-very-aggressive Neo turbo cam, mean that the inlet side is simply not matched to the slightly ported exhaust side coupled with somewhat longer duration cam. And that is not even beginning to address the possibility that the overlap/relative timing of those two mismatched cams might make that all the worse at around 4000rpm, and not be quite so bad at high rpm. I would be dropping in at least a 260 cam in the inlet, if not larger, see what happens. I'd also be thinking very hard about pulling the straight gate off, banging a normal gate on there and letting it vent to the wild, just as an experiment.
    • Not a problem at all Lithium, I appreciate your help regardless. I've pulled a small part of a log where the target pressure was 28psi and it spiked to 36.4psi. I've only just begun using Data Log Viewer so if I'm sending this in the wrong format let me know.
×
×
  • Create New...