Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt35r Vs Garrett T04z - Discussion (just Post In This Thread To Create A Database)


Recommended Posts

No probs, for a while I thought I was the only one here - design engineer/fea monkey that is.

One of the reasons I dont open my own shop :-) modding cars is much nicer as a hobby than a living... got 4 350kw+ sr20's done in the last 12 months :down: all GT35 ha ha that excludes some non nissan projects.

  • 1 month later...
a very old quote but im slowly getting through the thread.

not that i dont believe you sky30 but i find it extremely hard to believe your making almost 400kw with a .86 rear......especially only on 20psi. that sounds like something a 5L motor would do.

im running a rb30 gt35r .86 @ 20psi only made 335rwkw. no head work as such but still....

do you have something to back that up? i do hope you prove me wrong because it gives me hope for my setup lol

i nearly made that on my rb26 with stock head and stock bottom end. bp ultimate, 20psi. Just cams.

i would expect your rb30 to make much closer to 360kw and maybe closer to400kw on 24psi ???

Hey all, I thought I'd come back to this thread first and tell you all that I've had to convert my project back to factory twin turbo setup from a GT35r.

It was a very hard decision for me and here were a couple of reasons for this including me running out of money and also insurance problems lol so yeh, I will do a proper post in the selling section on SAU I guess. (I haven't tried selling on here before so am a bit unsure) I'll get up some photos too. Manifold and turbo, brand new, no more than 350-400km on it - don't laugh lol - it's been in the workshop more than at my place!

One of the guy on here mentioned a while back that he wouldn't mind seeing how a .63 exhaust housing performs as most the guys run the .82 rear end and yeh, it comes on hard at around 3800-4000 on a bog stock engine running splitfires, E11v2 and a 044. I had it dialed in at about 13 pounds from memory and it came on with a nice thump....a fair bit earlier than the 0.82 housing which I also ran before downsizing (for those who recall my posts in this thread).

So yeh, hope to post a proper thread up in the for sale section tomorrow ;-)

  • 2 weeks later...

As I was saying earlier in this post, dyno's here suck,,,

Anything over 6000rpm even at only 1.7bar and set to boost up as slow as possible the sx roasted its 285's... made 428kw at 6100rpm with the T04z,

Going to be going up country in the next few weeks to use a hub dyno and do a run at a semi decent drag strip so I can try convert the 210kph trap speeds into somthing decent ET wise.

  • 1 month later...

Just got back from the workshop.

Compared my GT3582 setup (blue line) with a Cerbera's T04Z setup (green line), which were both run up on the same Dyno Dynamics dyno in shootout mode.

Not sure if Simon's had any issues, but my setup is strangled HARD in the top end. So much so, that adding 5psi and 2 degrees ignition timing gained me a whole 1hp up top. Did gain about 30hp through the mid range though, but I obviously have a large restriction in my inlet/exhaust which isn't allowing any more than 500hp flow.

Anyways, enough ricers excuses, here is the comparison:

11m59gn.jpg

Edited by Brockas

What sized turbine housing did the GT35R have ? No pun intended but the greatest difference between Diesel and petrol GT3582R's , center section aside , is the housings . Big GT40 suckers on the Diesel ones which is a size up from the T04 ones on T04Z's .

If Garrett were doing the GT3582R justice it would be in a large frame BB center section and in housings like the GT4082 or GT4088R's have . As they are the turbine housing is a bored out GT30 one and the cold side a T04S one .

The best you can do for a GT3582R petrol turbo is to use the largest 1.06 A/R T3 flanged one or a modified T4 International flanged T4 housing . I think ATP do a large flanged TS housing for them .

A .

Paul - I think its also struggling earlier on as well.

It is a bit lazy up onto boost, any idea what is causing that at all? Could be a double edge sword once you fix one end the other comes good.

If you have the peak of 24psi on around 30km/h earlier (115/116 as opposed to 140), it would make that mid range even more interesting in the GT35's favour.

Would be interesting to see just how much difference it would make too, definitely you would notice it just driving around if the difference is as good as i suspect it might be.

(just the assumption here as following on from the ramp up before it starts to build slowly from 21 to 23.5psi)

Were those runs same day?

Cerbera's car has been parted out for about a year, so the T04Z run is a little old.

We're stumped as to why it's restricted. The only thing we can think is the head I'm using (off a 34 N1 motor) has a few imperfections in it which is causing turbulence. I'm using a china manifold, but the same type on Natalotto's car did 630hp with a T04Z. Exhaust is fine, intake is free, plenum is stock, cams are pretty big (270x10.8).

Disco, I'm using the GCG T04 rear for the 35. It's a T4 flanged 0.84 housing. I don't think the rear housing is the issue to be honest.

Cerbera's car has been parted out for about a year, so the T04Z run is a little old.

We're stumped as to why it's restricted. The only thing we can think is the head I'm using (off a 34 N1 motor) has a few imperfections in it which is causing turbulence. I'm using a china manifold, but the same type on Natalotto's car did 630hp with a T04Z. Exhaust is fine, intake is free, plenum is stock, cams are pretty big (270x10.8).

Disco, I'm using the GCG T04 rear for the 35. It's a T4 flanged 0.84 housing. I don't think the rear housing is the issue to be honest.

It could well be the head, upwards of 500hp is near capacity for the gt35 so everything would have to be working pretty damn near perfect in conjunction with each other to get everything out of the gt35.

Actually, after comparng ur graph to a mates latest tune graph, i would almost put money on it being the head. Both power lines are near identical until ~106kph where his power picks up extremely fast. His graph is below, his is a built 25 but his head has solid lifters, 1mm exhaust valves, extensive porting and chamber work but only 260/9.15 cams. It's on a pretty safe tune aswell and theres plenty left in it.

post-20917-1249910998_thumb.jpg

Some people are doing well with the 1.06 twin scroll T4 International flanged turbine housing , I guess it depends on what your position is with TS .

Also the 82mm compressor is GT40 family and tends to like keeping it in the family with a GT40 back plate and comp housing .

If you look at HKS's comp housing for the T04Z I believe most of them have a larger diameter diffuser wall cast into them . The GT40's diffuser diameter is larger than the T04's and I believe a step in the right direction .

If you can have a look at the GT3582R's compressor map , narrow ranging for an 82mm GT family compressor end . Also from the turbine maps you can see how they scribe an arc rather than rising to a sort of plateau and flat lining .

The more expensive option but a well setup GT4088R is better overall for higher outputs than either a Gt3582R or T04Z .

My 2c only , A .

How long is a piece of string?

I made 560rwhp then 510rwhp on two dyno's only a week apart.

If you're chasing figures, a GT35R isn't for you. If you're chasing a great track/street turbo then..... well.... I rate it.

How long is a piece of string?

I made 560rwhp then 510rwhp on two dyno's only a week apart.

If you're chasing figures, a GT35R isn't for you. If you're chasing a great track/street turbo then..... well.... I rate it.

I wasnt asking how long a piece of sting is, I was asking which is the longest :P

The GT35 isnt/wasnt for me, I know that, I ripped it off and went T04z, just wondering what the highest figures are guys pull out of the medium A/R GT35's...

Heard rumours of some very high HP GT35's running around... just wondering what the "norm" power at 30+psi is you guys expect,

WA at least the highest I've heard of is ~600 on a hub dyno but I dont know the specifics of the setup (a/r, boost etc). I'd say I could get there easily with more boost but who knows when the set-up will run out of legs, 'only' 25psi at the moment.

Brockas set-up is as much as 110hp down on mine under 4500, something is amiss there.

Edited by DCIEVE

Would be very interesting to see how a twin scroll t4 1.06 a/r rear (as recommended by fr) would perform compared to the garden variety single entry t3/t4 0.8x. FR claimed spool and response would improve, but I wasn't convinced the difference would be great enough to justify the expense considering I'm already making pretty good power by 4000rpm (more than most low mount twin combinations I've seen).

Edited by DCIEVE

When you want all that the GT35 turbine and the GT40 compressor can give you have to move beyond the housings Garrett fit to the GT3582R .

As a center section the GT25 based BB one is on borrowed time with wheels of this size . Occasionally if leaned on really hard GT3582R's have been known to bend the turbine shaft and the compressor then does a elliptic orbit and trashes itself .

I'm not 100% sure but I think this turbo may have grown out of the HKS spec "GT3240" - which itself had a bored out GT30 based turbine housing and a T04S compressor housing .

Geoff Raicer played about with a few things and came to the conclusion that for these turbos to survive super duty work they need to be built into the larger frame (center section) size with its beefier bearing section and larger diameter shaft . Once the cartridge can survive then you can use housings better suited to the gas flow requirements of 650 + horsepower .

Turbonetic built one with a slightly larger turbine - and shaft - and call it F1-35R , it also used a reasonably beefy twin scroll T4 International flanged turbine housing to make it work .

I think in the end Geoff though why go through all this grief and expense when Garrett already had their GT4088R which is a far more modern thing on all counts .

Garrett went to a lot of trouble with the 78 trim GT40 turbine and housing to make these units responsive for their size .

The compressor may look wuzzy on paper (52 trim) but your talking 52 trim in an 88 mm diameter wheel so not really lacking . The SPEED match is what makes that 88R's wheels complement themselves really well .

If you get the chance go have a look at a GT4088R because they are big on performance but possibly not as physically big as people may think not having picked one up . Nothing like GT42R big .

In my opinion they are more of a 3L engine turbo than a 2.6 one , Geoff did try them on RB26's and to be honest I can't remember how they went - probably as you'd expect a 650-700 Hp turbo on a low compression 2558cc engine .

The T04Z does have its place , its just IMO that HKS put all their smarts into their housings because they knew the Garrett ones were a bit ho hum on a high performance petrol engine .

Cheers A .

I believe just north of 500 is where the "T3" flange runs out of real estate . Maybe a bit less in twin scroll form .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Bit of an update to this one. Having some issues on the dyno that held us back (boost spiking) and I want to pass some info over you guys and see what you think is wrong with my setup. The current readout on this dyno is 462rwkw on a low reading dyno so keep in mind it is a real world 500rwkw setup on a hub dyno. Don't read into the power figure too much as a sign of the issue. The short and curly of it is: 2.8 Litre Racepace build RB25 NEO N/A Head with VCT (internally standard however ) Borgwarner EFR 8474  Turbosmart 50mm Straight Gate + Mac valve 6Boost Manifold 4" dump to full 4" exhaust (nil restrictions) Wastegate plumbed back in and all angles in the exhaust system are acceptable and not too sharp. GFB SV52 BOV in cooler piping  Turbosmart BOV in EFR Housing   The issue we are having is it comes onto full boost for example at 4000rpm and spikes to 24/25psi, before dropping down to 17psi before slowly rising back up to the target boost of 23psi. It was extremely uncontrollable and the tuner actually had to ramp in boost progrssively with each 1000rpm on each boost setting we selected to try and reduce the amount of spiking. Sometimes we would see a drop of 10psi from the peak at the beginning of the run, to the low, until it took the next 500-1000rpm to stabilise back up to the target boost. The tuner is pretty confident that the straight gate is just a poorly designed product and leaks too much boost upon cracking the gate open and theres no way to fix it other than going to a poppet valve. He's also confient theres no ignition breakdown or floating valves. The fueling is extremely stable as well. Turbo speed is somewhere around the 109,000rpm area. The spanner in the works for me is that prior to this Borgwarner and StraightGate, the car was tuned on -5 twins at a diferent tuner, and he also had issues controlling the boost with it spiking around the same rpm range, so to me this sounds like the same issue and it can't be anything on the turbo side as this was all changed and I think the behaviour is extremely similar, if not the same. We also removed the mac valve and did a run on wastegate pressure and it still spiked and had the same behaviour. My thoughts on possibilities are: Boost Leak VCT Cam Gear isn't reliably activating consistently - (On this however, we did a run with the VCT disabled and the boost still spiked) Turbosmart BOV is not handling the boost? However this seems unlikely to not be able to handle 20psi. I have a couple of logs that I can't make sense of if anybody knows how to read them and can obtain further logs of other parameters if they are not enough, happy to pay for anyones time. The dyno readout with the power figure is the most recent last week. The other picture is from two weeks prior to that where we couldn't break 400kw (we removed the cat), however the issue of the boost control persisted. @Lithium @Piggaz @burn4005 @GTSBoy @discopotato03 I've tagged those that were quite active in recent pages here, no disrespect to those that know turbos well but I missed tagging. Cheers 
    • I recently purchased a 2018 Infiniti Q60, which has an SD card navigation map. I can see my system has options for real time traffic updates etc, and am wondering if there is something I can purchase to get this working? I can see there are at least updated maps for USA and Canada, but nothing for Australia. Surely Infiniti took changing road systems and city expansions into account when they decided to use an inbuilt navigation over Android Auto/Apple Car Play, or are we doomed to drive on streets that don't exist in the navigation system if you drive to a new area?
    • Luckily I didn't put in etch primer as I just found out it's not compatible with my body filler lol. Also just need to sand the panel anywhere between 150-400 grit so I'm in the clear there. It does say to not apply to soft old paint, I assume that means paint that is flaking, peeling,etc
    • @dbm7 and @GTSBoy thank you both very much! will give that a shot!
×
×
  • Create New...