Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt35r Vs Garrett T04z - Discussion (just Post In This Thread To Create A Database)


Recommended Posts

haha thought that might stir you up...

mine went 574 @ 24psi thank you very much!!!

plus it also went 560rwhp at 20psi but yoda backed off timing so it was nice and safe :)

brockas should make anywhere between 560-600rwhp i would imagine, hopefully 573.9 so I can give him shit for years to come :banana:

i know you were stirring, i dont think ive seen a non-stirring post from you yet. :)

Yer i agree on brockas figures, he has pretty big cams so that should help alot, i think he has no port work on the head at all from memory? im thinking 575hp on the roller and 625hp or so on the hubber.

Im keen on those precision turbos mentioned, they seem pretty good from what ive read up but cant find prices anywhere and any real solid info on them, like are they watercooled and ballbearing, t4 flanged, twin scroll?

Edited by unique1
270 it is then. .1L shouldnt make a huge difference anyways.

It's not even 0.1L

RB26 isn't a true 2600cc. It is less.

IIRC its about 70cc difference RB25 to RB26

Have any of you guys running rb26's in your gtr with either to4z or GT35r got upgraded valves/springs etc in your top end or what have you had to do besides cams in the top end?

just wondering how a stock head will go on a built bottom end with say a GT35R? interested in this thread, coz im tossing up which way to go down the track a bit.

You can get the Billet Turbos in Journal or Ball Bearing. Wide variety of T3 and T4 exhaust housings are available. There are different compressor housing options as well. About 1000$ for the Journal version and 1400$ for the Ball Bearing version i think. Contact a turbo destributor and ask about the Precision Billet 6765. There are a couple being sold on ebay as well.

Have any of you guys running rb26's in your gtr with either to4z or GT35r got upgraded valves/springs etc in your top end or what have you had to do besides cams in the top end?

just wondering how a stock head will go on a built bottom end with say a GT35R? interested in this thread, coz im tossing up which way to go down the track a bit.

Stock head, with the only work done for clearance of the 10.8mm cams, and upgraded springs.

Valves are standard.

Stock head, with the only work done for clearance of the 10.8mm cams, and upgraded springs.

Valves are standard.

ok. thanks, interesting to know what others have done etc for there set ups, gives others a chance to compare and see where the best place to spend your cash is in an engine build up process.

^ plenty of guys running @ 380-400rwkw, factory valves/cams and bit of a tidy up.

More depends on the condition of the head to begin with really, one person might be fine, you might not and vice versa

^ plenty of guys running @ 380-400rwkw, factory valves/cams and bit of a tidy up.

More depends on the condition of the head to begin with really, one person might be fine, you might not and vice versa

yeah totally agree. i would get the head fully rebuilt when it goes back on once i do the engine, just to make sure everything is going to run smoothly.

also what manifolds are people running? has this has much of an affect also? in the future im looking at maybe a GT35R on highmount manifold (most likely 6boost) just slowly planning it all first and what parts i need to aquire.

Car run in..

Getting tuned end of this week/ next week ...

Will post results..

Built 26... garrett .84 t04z

Been a long wait... good luck!

  • 2 weeks later...
I'm about to bolt on a T04Z with .81 rear housing, so we will have a direct comparison, on the same dyno with the same engine, between a GT35R and T04Z.

Should be finished by next week.

any results on this?

Was just about to post here.

No results just yet.

As it needs a complete retune anyway, we've taken the opportunity to install a Power FC d-jetro, and get rid of the AFM's.

Unfortunately, this makes it no longer a 'bolt off bolt on' situation, but the lack of AFM's shouldn't really effect top end much, just driveability.

Power FC arrives next week, hopefully tuned on Thursday/Friday.

has anyone had both these set-ups on a car before or seen them on cars. im looking at the exact same problem.. cant choose which one

has anyone had both these set-ups on a car before or seen them on cars. im looking at the exact same problem.. cant choose which one

Give me a week...

*prays to the gods

573.9

573.9

573.9

Scali's using Natalotto's map as a base for mine, so here's hoping I smash your figure haha

Edited by Brockas
  • 2 weeks later...
Was just about to post here.

No results just yet.

As it needs a complete retune anyway, we've taken the opportunity to install a Power FC d-jetro, and get rid of the AFM's.

Unfortunately, this makes it no longer a 'bolt off bolt on' situation, but the lack of AFM's shouldn't really effect top end much, just driveability.

Power FC arrives next week, hopefully tuned on Thursday/Friday.

Hows the results for this coming along?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Got the motor out and torn down. I'll be dropping off the block Monday. Luckily the scoring on Cyl6 is much less pronounced then the pictures made it out to seem. It can barely be felt. If you pass your finger over it 10x you'll barely notice it. Hopefully by some chance it will only require a honing. I'm not in the mood to buy one size larger pistons or another block. Oddly enough my 6th cylinder with the scoring has extremely clean intake valves compared to my other 5 cylinders. I'm worried the scoring was caused by too much fuel or Water/Methanol washing the cylinder. I'll review some old logs to confirm.  This was also the first time I pull an engine with the transmission still attached. It went much better then expected. I was worried my CD009 wouldn't make it easy due to its sheer size but it was much easier this way. 
    • From the pictures I have when doing the job the flywheel is the same diameter, I don't think they're playing weird tricks like putting weights at the outer diameter to increase flywheel inertia or anything like that. The OEM flywheel is definitely heavier, but it's not a huge difference. Quoted weight savings of the clutch is 2 kg so I can't imagine the flywheel being lighter than ~7 kg. Kind of regret not weighing it before the clutch went into the car but as far as driveability goes I have no complaints.
    • HKS trigger kit should be very easy to integrate with a Link. It's a 36-2 crank trigger. Hard part is finding the motivation to take off the timing belt and everything on the front of the engine to install it. You also need to cut out a hole in the oil pump housing so the sensor can read the trigger wheel. Changing out the cam sensor for a 24 tooth setup is probably good enough but as others have mentioned depending on what underlying assumptions are changed it becomes more of a problem. Reading the crank state off of the cam is an abstraction that works in the general case, but if you have an edge case it makes less and less sense. There is a GTX2860 gen 2 that can take a compact 5 bolt housing so it's direct bolt on but I'm not 100% sure of what's involved. Peak compressor efficiency drops off a bit on these turbos vs -5s, 77% vs 73% but you get way, way wider region of operation. The -5s have a really strange surge line in their compressor map that is all over the place. If you think the hot side on the -5s aren't open enough you can try the Tomei T550B turbos which a local tuner seems to be happy with:
    • i need a complete tail light for my R33 GTR if you have please let me know.
    • I need a great maintenance workshop around Idaho, if you know one please let me know..
×
×
  • Create New...