Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt35r Vs Garrett T04z - Discussion (just Post In This Thread To Create A Database)


Recommended Posts

  Lukas 33 said:
Did Paul tune your car? Is that the Twin scroll or just a single entry? Have to let me know how responsive it is etc

yes, twin scroll...

Not super responsive, not that you can complain 400kw & 2.6L would never be. 4,***rpm (haven't been driving it much) until it starts pulling hard..

It's definitely use-able when you put in the effort & keep it at high revs..

  NYTSKY said:
35R mate :rant:

Getting greedy are we......35R is suited to a 3L imo, is yours 3L cant remember?????Altho my mates 25 with a 3582 is pretty awsome (top end to burn) i'm sure you will be more than happy.

Still a 2.5L.

It was a hard decision and something i thought alot about. Ill give away about 400-500rpm in response but will be close to making 600rwhp.

Should be finished with the swap (amongst other things) late Jan.

Good luck with it Nytsky, you have spent the money where it counts so i'm sure you will get the results your after.......Keep us all posted on the results won't ya.

  Cerbera said:
lol there are so many things wrong with that dyno graph i dont even know where to start

lol wow... its like... a dyno run in reverse the graph is that poor... dear me. I'd be sacking that tuner!

  NYTSKY said:
Still a 2.5L.

It was a hard decision and something i thought alot about. Ill give away about 400-500rpm in response but will be close to making 600rwhp.

Nice! Will be good to see how it goes, especially if you go the E85 path again. With a twin scroll T4 GT35R you'll probably lose very little response.... I'm kindof umming and ahhing about go that way :D

  R31Nismoid said:
lol wow... its like... a dyno run in reverse the graph is that poor... dear me. I'd be sacking that tuner!

WOW is right...

I think we just agreed on something, it might be a merry xmas after all :D

  Cerbera said:
lol there are so many things wrong with that dyno graph i dont even know where to start
  R31Nismoid said:
lol wow... its like... a dyno run in reverse the graph is that poor... dear me. I'd be sacking that tuner!

Yeah well it's never going to look like a proper run when it goes on the dyno with low compression....

won't be pulling it down till January but..

Even with low compression - on all 6 cyclinders?

  Cerbera said:
WOW is right...

I think we just agreed on something, it might be a merry xmas after all :D

lol indeed :(

  Lithium said:
Nice! Will be good to see how it goes, especially if you go the E85 path again. With a twin scroll T4 GT35R you'll probably lose very little response.... I'm kindof umming and ahhing about go that way :D

Thats the way i wanted to go, TS GT35R. But id have to get a new manifold made and mod the dump a little. Would be a great combo though.

Due to cost and ease of change over i got the single entry .82 housing, with the new .70 surge slot cover :(

Basically a straight swap, using the same fittings and lines. And it will be on E85 of coarse.

Just for interest for those reading,

Max power per each of the below?

GT35 .63

GT35 .82

GT35 1.06

GT35 .78 TS

VS: T04z

T4_Divided .70

T4_Divided .84

T4_Divided 1.00

T4_Divided 1.15

T4_Divided 1.32

T4_Undivided .61

T4_Undivided .70

.81 A/R T4 Undivided with 3" V-Band outlet

.96 A/R T4 Undivided with 3" V-Band outlet

Well... here it is...

This is as even of a comparison as we could manage. Bolted off a GT35R (red line) and bolted on a T04Z (blue line).

Graph makes it seem like its a laggy bitch, and the T04Z setup is shit... to be honest I'm not sure yet. The Z is so much fun, but not sure if it'll be faster than the 35R on the track (I doubt it). May end up going back to a 35R at some stage, but going to enjoy the extra top end for the time being...

beii5j.jpg

RPM limit was increase to 8500 to account for the extra 500+ rpm of lag.

Would be a lot better if the wastegate wasn't shit and ramped as hard as it should...

Edited by Brockas

Ye i was going to say it looks like boost control could use some improvements - but at least its using the same boost control setup through both runs.

You really should get that fixed, would make a very noticeable gain :)

GT35 FTW! :D

great to see the back to back result, would bee good to see the power the gt35 would make with the same amount of boost as the to4z.

Interesting to see it lost 110 HP through the midrange to gain only 80hp top end.

If the gt35 didnt taper off boost so much in the higher revs the top end power figures would be alot closer.

Edited by sky30

Would have been good if the boost levels were identical......and your wastegate woes fixed ..........for a true back to back comparo.

Great comparison anyway for the purposes of this thread.

GT35 Wins !

At the same boost level that top end power gap would be less.

Interesting that you changed the limiter too ?

I assume thats to give you a bit more power band.

Engine life would now be reduced.

Mind you, all that said. The top end power of the Z would be damn sweeeeet :)

Using the same boost level is i dunno, arguable.

Remember the turbo's have different areas of efficiency and so on.

Best of running them both where they both perform best and comparing off that IMO.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I'm hoping I just don't have to do an engine rebuild NOW. Doesn't mean I won't do it at some point. I think a plus point is that the car presumably ran on or close to stock power nearly all it's life so far. Only the Owner I bought it from actually increased power with a standalone ECU and blew the OEM turbos. And after it got thee 2860s it wasn't driven an awful lot either.   That is what I meant. With the twins coming on so late (4500-5000rpm) I hope the rods won't want to exit the block prematurely. And it still being a 26 means the torque curve isn't gonna hike up all that much.   It didn't blow up on the dyno when they tuned it to 500ish crank. So I suppose it'll be okay for now. They did put a Tomei head gasket on first though which did not seal at all, and they redid it with a Cometic one. Which I hope won't be my water leak.   Mainly anything oil. So far all it has is the N1 pump, oil restrictor and a filter relocation kit with a cooler.
    • 15000? ish? Something like that anyway. It wasn;t so much a wear as a tear that then spread. Might have lasted a lot longer if not bothered by just one incident, whatever it was. I took a punt. They are really comfortable and do a good job of holding. My daughter HATED it when I first put them in, and probably still does now. She has sensory issues and hates the way they are all up your business. I'm 197cm and 95kg. Not fat or particularly wide, and the XL size seat is the rigth fit. If I was any fatter it would start to get too snug. Any skinnier and you'd possibly want the smaller width.
    • Mrs rs focus came factory with recaro cs  sportsters in it and they a pain in the ass to get in and out of with the really high bolsters, once you were in them they were one of the most comfortable seats I have ever sat in
    • The NA 2.5 has very little torque. You won't feel much. Those trannies are also a million years old now and it could well be f**ked. First generation electronically controlled autos will often refuse to kick down, ete, etc, depending on what's wrong with them.
    • Yes, but no but yes but no. Those "it's fine up to 500HP" rules and everything else like it were all determined back when the cars were 10 years old. As they are now 30 years old.....what do you reckon the chances of something shitting the bed are? I'd say they are much higher now than they used to be. You might be lucky. You might be unlucky. Spin the wheel and find out. Yeah, nah. It's actually exactly the opposite. Making boost early and having heaps of torque able to be generated right in the middle of the rev range will do more to damage an engine than having to rev it high to make the power. Think about the load on the conrods, bearings, etc, to make 400HP at 4000 rpm, vs 400 HP at 6500 rpm. So someone has already "let the Nissan out" which is how we describe the increased chance of a fiddled with engine to have had something done wrongly. Many more engines that have been opened die than stock ones do - even if you into consideration how they are treated wrt power levels and the like. Again, not saying that yours will definitely have been put back together by a moron. But the possibility does exist. It's still a lottery. Spin the wheel. What weakspots?
×
×
  • Create New...