Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt35r Vs Garrett T04z - Discussion (just Post In This Thread To Create A Database)


Recommended Posts

"GT3566" sounds like its moving closer in the direction of a T04Z than a GT3582R. One of my mates made 1bar by ~3500rpm with a GT3582R and a 6boost manifold on an RB25 so 20psi by under 4000rpm with a cammed RB26 and a good manifold could be conceiveable. The 4300rpm 20psi 370wkw setup was with a first ever effort manifold made in the garage and probably gives a fair bit away to things like 6boost/Fullrace manifolds.

For those that love to hate.

T04z on RB25 with small cams planted in a S14...

1bar by 4000rpm

1.5bar by 4300rpm

2bar by 4500rpm

Done in 4th gear because I cant hold the video cam and drive in 3rd as the 285's loose traction (got some vid of that as well)

If you want to see the video supply an email addy as its 19mb because as soon as i compress it you cant see the rev counter...

Edited by Rezlo
For those that love to hate.

T04z on RB25 with small cams planted in a S14...

1bar by 4000rpm

1.5bar by 4300rpm

2bar by 4500rpm

Done in 4th gear because I cant hold the video cam and drive in 3rd as the 285's loose traction (got some vid of that as well)

If you want to see the video supply an email addy as its 19mb because as soon as i compress it you cant see the rev counter...

Rezlo,

I wouldn't mind checking the video out as I too am tossing up between a T04z and a GT35. Maybe you could post it up on youtube? My email is [email protected]

Cheers,

Tom

EDIT: yep, I'm hating already! LOL

Edited by tommis85

Sent,

Both vids are with a full 3" exhaust as well (they very serious about sound emissions here) when I run the 4" dump from the down pipe for drags it spools up a bit faster.

Unfortunatly I can not tell you that, we only have one proper hub dyno in RSA, thats about 1400km from where I live, all our local home brew dyno's love to have cars walk at anything over 300kw so we learn to do without dyno's for tuning or power runs.

First round of our nationals are in feb, will see if I can get it on the hub dyno,

Edited by Rezlo

i have a fully built rb25 with a GT35 with .82 rear housing. it hits 20psi at 4000rpm, which is great for the track but i drive the car on the street more and find it a little laggy on the street. im goin to change the rear housing to a .62 as i feel i would enjoy driving it more and its not all about how much power it makes its about how it makes the power n wen. dont get me wrong it is reasonably responsive n 4000rpm for 20psi is good but u need the rev the crap out of it all the time to hav the power n u just cant do that on the street unless u want to loose ur licence. but hey like i said wen ur on the track and the revs are up round the 4000k plus the turbo spools very quick n is awsome.

post-38614-1230856491_thumb.jpg

Well OT but IMO you could have made more than enough power with a GT3076R which for its size is a better thing than a GT3582R in small turbine housing form . 2WD RB25 , how much can you get to the ground .

My opinions only , cheers A .

BTW has anyone looked into the large frame BB P/60-1 ?

http://www.atpturbo.com/Merchant2/merchant...tegory_Code=GTB

http://www.atpturbo.com/Merchant2/merchant...tegory_Code=GTB

Cheers A .

Edited by discopotato03

ive drivven both round a track. the 35 is more lazy and comes on sooner but much less urgantly. it drops right of on gearchanges

t04z has to be driven in anger comes on much harder but makes more power. it is much laggier on the track but. it doesnt drop of nearly as much as on gearchanges once its going.

unless you are a gun driver (which im not) the 35r will be a better choice. but you will miss the exitement and power of a t04z.

you really need to work out if you can live with lag. 350-400kw is a very broad and dificult target to reach with minimul lag.

t04z has to be driven in anger comes on much harder but makes more power. it is much laggier on the track but. it doesnt drop of nearly as much as on gearchanges once its going.

You mentioned this dropping off on gearchanges thing, thats a bit weird - was it more than one car that you have experienced this dropping off thing with GT35Rs? I've been in cars running .63 and .82 GT35Rs on RB25/26/30s and once you are in the "happy zone" they have always come on nice and hard and certainly no falling over in gears - wonder if what you have experienced there is something a bit different.

Maybe it had the new HKS BOV? of the 3 Ive now used on turbo's bigger than GT30's with 1.5bar or more they all dont shut fast enough making the vehicle feel terrible between shifts

Edited by Rezlo

What would the other determining factors (other than the turbo) as to where/how quick your car builds boost/power?

Eg; if two cars using identical turbos (incl rear housing), what would be the major things that differntiate their power outputs?

eg

-maifold design

-cams

-exhaust size

because i guess you could get a properly set up T04Z making power nearly as early as a poorly set up GT35 Right?

sorry if this doesnt make sense, im just trying to understand the 'bigger picture'

to me it felt like the inertia of the t4 kept it spinning longer than the 35r inbetween changes. both cars had a properly functioning bov vented to atmo (ie no flutter)

Yes I agree with you, if I change over 5000rpm that power is there almost instantly in the following gear...

the T04Z/T67BB/whatever people call them are "So pre-2005" these days haha.

Makes me wonder how the GT35 is so much more advanced for having so much less power and only fractionaly faster spool up.. Maybe Garrett is working backwards?

Makes me wonder how the GT35 is so much more advanced for having so much less power and only fractionaly faster spool up.. Maybe Garrett is working backwards?

Because while the GT35R has a lower power potential makes a reasonable amount less power, it is MUCH better in terms of spool. Here is a dyno comparison of a GT35R and a T04Z on very very similar engine setups and boost levels:

2l8j9fc.jpg

You can see the GT35R is starting to fall over though the T04Z setup with 270deg cams might have a bit of a breathing advantage as there is no other rational explanation for it to be making more power through the midrange on less boost.

I'm fairly sure thats my 35r in the plot above. Here is the original which explains the strange power curve. The mid-range is weak as its only 1.3bar, boost creeps as revs rise as does power. The drop-off up top is due to boost coming back down to where it should be.

My head is stock with only tomei poncams whereas Simons gtr (I'm fairly sure thats his in the plot) has some headwork/cams. Looks like Paul has scaled my plot to account for the difference between hubbers and dd.

done18.jpg

Edited by DCIEVE

If he has scaled it, it looks like he has given the T04Z the benefit of the doubt as really with the amount of boost the GT35R is creeping up to in the midrange I'd expect it to surpass the T04Z at those rev ranges, though the T04Z will no doubt edge it out before and after those points.... shame about the "funny" boost curve as it doesn't do the GT35Rs strengths over the T04Z justice, even in shape of the curve. Its still pretty blatent how much better it spools, though.

If that graph is of Simons' GTR then that's not really a typical example of a T04Z on a typical RB26.. it's all horses for courses though!

Simon who? Its some SAU member's one, can't remember his username. There is a Simon in NZ who has a Stagea with a T04Z on it which is also much laggier/weaker down low than any dyno plot I've ever seen for a GT35R - but it makes good power, of course.

The overlay above is the only decent reference of one in comparison with a GT3582R though - do you think its better or worse than usual?? Its consistant with what I've seen overall - all things being equal, the GT35R is invariably a fair bit better spooling than a T04Z and the T04Z is capable of more up top. Its not too surprising, as the T04Z is like 6mm larger on the inducer, bigger turbine, and older design - I'm not sure what magic people think they have which would make them spool similar to a GT35R.

Hell my mate who has a GT35R on his GTR can launch the thing at the drags at 5500-6000rpm without bogging, if it launches the way guys with low mount twins like GT2530s need to he just fries the tyres through 1st - and T04Zs are laggier again than those. Go figure.

Edited by Lithium

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I mean this in no disrespect to u mate; Are there clear tagged examples/explanations in our SAU forum for example, in my interest, this is how to do R34 Gtt suspension the right way? U guys did so much taking risks with experimentation that deserves recognition and those results helps us morons take the RIGHT path to buy quality / buy once. 🍻
    • Pretty much what you'd expect at that power level. Hypergear turbo, long list of supporting mods, full Haltech catalogue, etc.  I'd say this goes for most drivers, suspension is still a dark art for most people. And it's really hard to convince someone how much better their setup could be...  
    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
×
×
  • Create New...