Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Probably a question for Sydneykid...

My 33 came across to the Aussie side with an aftermarket Chipped ECU. The car was labled a freak cause it constantly made 10-15kw more than any other car with the same mods.

A strange thing occured to me, the VCT with the "chipped ECU" wasn't being activated untill 5000-5500rpm. Also was running massive timing advance. I am wondering if there is any advantage from doing this???.....I can't see how there could be unless it has a different inlet cam. Anyway felt really cool, sort of had three power bands.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/24647-controlling-vct-on-rb25det/
Share on other sites

I thought the vct on thr RB25 was activated on startup and acted to improve low to midrange torque cutting out at some point in the higher rev range. My EMS computer is supposed to optimise performance by setting the optimum point to cut out the VCT to give the best output for both low and high revs

VCT on teh RB25 is activated in the lower/mid range

~2000rpm

Im running a Wolf v4, and while we were initially tunning it we had some time to fool around with the VCT on the dyno

We did a comparo by changing its activation point and basically the conclusion we came with is its best left where its designed for

We had it active "ala honda vtec style" higher up in the rev range and it wasnt as efficient in making power as it was lower down inthe lower to mid range

hope this helped

as whistla said it works best where its designed for.

i dont think the nissan engineer's put in that operating range because they can , they have spend a hellofa lot more R&D then any of us ever could..

if you want to help the VCT work more effectively try a adjustable exhaust cam wheel .

I was waiting to find this: http://www.tomei-p.co.jp/_2003web-catalogu...haft-specs.html or something similar until I posted:)

NVCS comes in just over 1000 rpm and cuts out at 4500rpm on RB25DET.

the best way I have heard of optimising NVCS is by doing two runs on a dyno, one with the NVCS switched on, one with the NVCS unplugged. Where the lines cross it the best point to switch off.

easy:D

Originally posted by Steve

the best way I have heard of optimising NVCS is by doing two runs on a dyno, one with the NVCS switched on, one with the NVCS unplugged.  Where the lines cross it the best point to switch off.

easy:D

This is exactly what i told my mechanic to do when programming/tunning the Wolf 3D. I believe that unless you change internals the optimum point is at the factory setting. This proved true, when tunning my car.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They need to get a grip. R32 GTRs got as low as AU$8-10K at one point here.
    • You have just offended every teenage boy in America
    • Structured text and other high level PLC programing languages are not allowable in Functional Safety. They are very difficult to audit. My PLC stuff is almost exclusively oriented towards Burner Management Systems which are a particularly pernicious form of Safety Instrumented System, when implemented in an SPLC. Even the part of the code written to work in the non-safety logic part of the PLC, like with a Siemens S7-1500 series, still needs to be treated as if it was safety code, with access restrictions, code fingreprints and the like. And Allen Bradley can go EABODs. They ae full of shit. They have this whole lie going on where they say if you use a ControlLogix controller and its IO, and then just duplicate the IOs (ie, run in series or parallel depending on type, to try to make it "fail safe") and "use these programming styles and place these restrictions on what you do" that you can achieve SIL2. What a load of crap. They just get away with it because no-one in the US seems to understand the first thing about Functional Safety and carries on as if all they have to do is buy only SIL2 rated equipment and hey presto, it's a SIL2 system. Idiots. /rant
    • If you're really considering leaving it, a great question to ask is, is the magnet going to stick to the sump? The answer to the above is the same answer towards if I'd have any level of comfort leaving it... Personally, based on the cost of a motor if the magnet were to cause damage, I'd be fishing it out either way. Use the methods in here. It fit in through the plug hole, it'll come out.   PS, get a small actuatable claw for a bore scope. OR if you know a vet, they have really cool controllable scopes with hooks on the end. Supposedly they're like playing a video game. Ask if they can acquire you one of their scopes... Engine oil after all is just a different type of lube right? Will only make it easier on the next dog or cat...
    • All other (Boolean) logic functions though, are just built on those blocks above. Which does give you a lot of functionality in logic. It is basing that on using thresholds with analogue signals like GTS alluded to.   Not having things like timers will make it less useful for some of the ramp up logic you'd want, and again, on Haltecs capacity specifically, I'm not across anymore what you can / can't do with different tables.   I'm assuming, with your logic you want to implement, not only do you want your timing safeties, you're wanting to be able to derive the duty cycle for your solenoid, to maintain I'm assuming 175PSi? Or are you using a standalone WMI controller to maintain the DC correct, and you just want the Haltech working out which fuelling maps you should be on?
×
×
  • Create New...