Jump to content
SAU Community

Offical word on 15 Year rule change so please read before importing.


Recommended Posts

http://www.dotars.gov.au/transreg/vsb/vsb_10.htm

Our Reference: L1999/0719

VEHICLES IMPORTED AS 15 YEARS OR OLDER

We wish to advise that:

Vehicles 15 years or older must be at least 15 years old at time of making an application. For example if the vehicle is manufactured in the month of November 1988, then an application cannot be made until November 2003.

Regulation 17 of the Motor Vehicle Standards Regulations provides that:

The Minister must approve an application to import a nonstandard road vehicle or a vehicle that does not

have an identification plate if the vehicle is 15 or more years old.

It is the applicant’s responsibility to ensure that vehicles meet the requirement to be 15 or more years old at the time of

application. It has become apparent that many applicants are expecting to import vehicles early in the new year under

the provisions of Regulation 17. To meet the requirements of the regulation vehicles must be at least 15 years old at the

time of application. Vehicles that do not meet that requirement are not eligible to be imported.

From 1 January 2004, applications to import vehicles that are 15 or more years old will need to include evidence to confirm the

age of the vehicle. Acceptable evidence would include (but not be limited to) confirmation from the vehicle manufacturer of

evidence of first date of registration. Applications that do not include this information will be rejected, unless it is obvious

from the vehicle model concerned that it would meet the requirements of Regulation 17 (for example, if the vehicle was a

Model T Ford).

like that'll stay

I'm still standing by my original thoughts on them either preventing all imports, or the more likely one of them changing to a 20year rule

no way will they allow all of these cars to come into Australia, GT-R's and other highly modified vehicles

I doubt those cars on the japanese wharves will make it here in the near future

The 15 year old rule wont change as it dosent need to, what it does need is some inforcement of the rules and stopping of dodgey people selling these cars and making promises to people that they cant keep.

Some of the 15 year cars I have seen posted on sites are some of the biggest pieces of shit and not all information of work required put forward.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My understanding is that UV tends to accelerate the aging process. If the car has been garaged, then you could probably get away with extending beyond 10 years. FWIW, in 2015, I had tyres on my 180B SSS that had a 3-digit code (2 for week, 1 for decade), ending in 0, so could have been more than 30 years old, but still worked fine. I did replaced them very quickly, though, once I discovered what the code meant!
    • But we haven't even gotten to the point of talking about stateless controllers or any of the good stuff yet!
    • You guys need to take this discussion to another thread if you want to continue it, most of the last 2 pages has nothing to do with OP's questions and situation
    • And this, is just ONE major issue for closed loop control, particularly using PID. One such issue that is created right here, is integrator wind up. But you know GTSBoy, "it's just a simple PID controller"...  
    • Nah. For something like boost control I wouldn't start my design with PID. I'd go with something that originates in the fuzzy logic world and use an emergency function or similar concept. PID can and does work, but at its fundamental level it is not suited to quick action. I'd be reasonably sure that the Profecs et al all transitioned to a fuzzy algorithm back in the 90s. Keep in mind also that where and when I have previously talked about using a Profec, I'm usually talking about only doing an open loop system anyway. All this talk of PID and other algorithms only comes into play when you're talking closed loop boost control, and in the context of what the OP needs and wants, we're probably actually in the realm of open loop anyway. Closed loop boost control has always bothered me, because if you sense the process value (ie the boost measurement that you want to control) in the plenum (after the throttle), then boost control to achieve a target is only desirable at WOT. When you are not WOT, you do not want the the boost to be as high as it can be (ie 100% of target). That's why you do not have the throttle at WO. You're attempting to not go as fast as you can. If the process variable is measured upstream of the throttle (ie in an RB26 plenum, or the cold side pipework in others) then yeah, sure, run the boost controller closed loop to hit a target boost there, and then the throttle does what it is supposed to do. Just for utter clarity.... an old Profec B Spec II (or whatever it is called, and I've got one, and I never look at it, so I can't remember!) and similar might have a MAP sensor, and it might show you the actual boost in the plenum (when the MAP sensor is connected to the plenum) but it does not use that value to decide what it is doing to control the boost, except to control the gating effect (where it stops holding the gate closed on the boost ramp). It's not closed loop at all. Once the gate is released, it's just the solenoid flailing away at whatever duty cycle was configured when it was set up. I'm sure that there are many people who do not understand the above points and wonder wtf is going on.  
×
×
  • Create New...