Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys wondering if this is a just an r33 series 2 afm, inside appears to be different and there is no mesh can someone comfirm, if so why is "power intake" selected on my power fc instead of "r33 normal", car has heaps of power till 5,000rpm then kind of tapers, fuel is bad 300k's per tank...it does have a k&N pod filter and aftermarket intake pipe to turbo.

post-31991-1227875544_thumb.jpg post-31991-1227875579_thumb.jpg post-31991-1227875606_thumb.jpg post-31991-1227875652_thumb.jpg post-31991-1227875680_thumb.jpg post-31991-1227875757_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/246829-r33-afm-or-power-intake-setup/
Share on other sites

The guy before you may have had a z32 afm and so he has selected a different option on the power fc. If for some reason it was removed before the car was sold to you and the option wasnt changed back to r33 standard then that would explain why its running bad and getting bad fuel economy. Try setting the option back to r33 and see how it goes.

yes, was supposed to have "230rwkw", confusing me as has the following mods, trust fmic, 3" mandrel bend exhaust, 3" split ces dump front, k&n pod filter and intake, blitz ebc, apexi power fc, stock series 2 turbo (max 200rwkw?)

is making 11.3psi on 80% injector duty, not sure if standard injectors, they are purple so assuming they are standard.

had a worked r32 gtr with 300rwkw and that was almost twice as fuel efficent, this rb25 got around 270k's to the tank to be exactly and thats with fuel at 99cents a litre

Edited by FOOLBOOST

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...