Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

why would you ask that? do you think its tune related?

yeah...initial tune on a new engine is critical...if too rich the excessively fueled mixture will not allow the rings to bed. It seems to me the engine has seen too much fuel for an extended period...contaminated an already below par oiling system...and failed.

Id be having a chat with the builder of the engine and who did the initial tune Joe.

Edited by DiRTgarage
  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

why would you ask that? do you think its tune related?

Doesnt overfuelling = extra rich tune?? But then you're wideband said 11.5 to 12 - so that doesnt add up.

Going back to your original post, you had lifter noise at 2500-3000 - was that straight after you got the motor, ie before the oil had a chance to become contaminated? If so, i guess that's a symptom of oil pressure issues.

Incomplete combustion = too rich (the black smoke is the incompletely burnt fuel, its coming out as carbon instead of co2), or missfire (say if you had a dodgy spark plug or coil, but you'd notice that).

Dirt - is 11.5 too rich for a new motor?

Incomplete combustion = too rich (the black smoke is the incompletely burnt fuel, its coming out as carbon instead of co2), or missfire (say if you had a dodgy spark plug or coil, but you'd notice that).

Dirt - is 11.5 too rich for a new motor?

no my latest race engine was run-in at 11.5's

well the report certainly seems to pinpoint the cause so i would say you got your moneys worth there. the engineer seems to know what he was talking about and checked everything properly. hopefully it tells you what you wanted to know about how and why it died. :devil:

well the report certainly seems to pinpoint the cause so i would say you got your moneys worth there. the engineer seems to know what he was talking about and checked everything properly. hopefully it tells you what you wanted to know about how and why it died. :cheers:

yeah thats all i really wanted. he did a great job for a good price.

i also want to point out - if i didnt have the overfueling problem would the motor still have starved of oil if i hit a track day seeing as though there was a blockage of the oil pick-up? i never really noticed it as i didnt hit the higher revs very often. only time i heard anything was at WSID after a run, i heard what i now realise was lifter noise - i never really got to inspect it as by the time i got back to the pits the noise was gone.

Edited by SECURITY
So you know there was an oil control issue but do you know what caused it? Shouldn't the builder have been checking such things as he went along?

it just didnt occure to me that it was an oil problem, i even swung past the engine builder's workshop while i was in the area teling him that i was really happy with the motor etc etc - i figured that all rb's had noisy lifters and thats what it was, just the lifters playing up. but as you go along you start to piece things together, unfortunately for me it happened a bit too late.

sounds like you've also got a dented sump, and is messin up your oil pickup. That aint good. Bottom the sump out on something?

You make sure to not let the car idle too much too? idling often causes fuel wash, is shit for run ins.

Sorry to hear. bloody expensive.

sounds like you've also got a dented sump, and is messin up your oil pickup. That aint good. Bottom the sump out on something?

You make sure to not let the car idle too much too? idling often causes fuel wash, is shit for run ins.

Sorry to hear. bloody expensive.

nah no dent in the sump mate.

This is kind of my point also, though I didn't have the technical understanding, as I was pointing out that oil-control had been listed as an issue and that comes down to the builder.

I still think he's at fault here.

It may have been overfueling and ultimatly not run in correctly but doesnt that report also states that the incorrect or not suitable enough O ring was installed on the oil pick up??

I have seen many which dont have flat flanges but if you use a suitable sized O ring they seal perfectly fine.

Alot of pickups have slightly curved flanges so when the bolts are tightened down it puts tension on the O ring.

Whilst it may have not been run in properly it surely would have failed on the track at high rpm due to the oil pick up sucking air through a less than adequate O ring seal.....

That comes back to whoever assembled it not using the correct O ring in the correct position. From the way I read the report even if the tune was spot on for running in an engine in the the long run the faulty O ring would have caused the engines demise further down the track anyways, the contaminated oil mearly enhanced the problem???

It may have been overfueling and ultimatly not run in correctly but doesnt that report also states that the incorrect or not suitable enough O ring was installed on the oil pick up??

I have seen many which dont have flat flanges but if you use a suitable sized O ring they seal perfectly fine.

Alot of pickups have slightly curved flanges so when the bolts are tightened down it puts tension on the O ring.

Whilst it may have not been run in properly it surely would have failed on the track at high rpm due to the oil pick up sucking air through a less than adequate O ring seal.....

That comes back to whoever assembled it not using the correct O ring in the correct position. From the way I read the report even if the tune was spot on for running in an engine in the the long run the faulty O ring would have caused the engines demise further down the track anyways, the contaminated oil mearly enhanced the problem???

spot on...post of the thread

i just thought i'd add that when the car initially left the tuners, he even said himself that it was running a bit LEAN. on my way home i did some touch ups which saw the car on ~14.7 on idle (factory ecu settings as i run an emanage ultimate), and around 11.7-12.1 on low boost levels and around 14.5-14.7 (std ecu settings) on cruise. it wasnt the best tune but i wasnt taking it over 4000rpm anyway.

later on after the run-in period i got into trialing software which cleaned up my afr's more - which i have data logs of. my AFR's were never dangerously rich or lean at any point other than the drive home from the tuners. and if it was lean after turning some boost up, it was for 1 power run to input into the software then afr's were sweet again.

not his fault that the o-ring on the pick-up wasnt assembled properly?

i'll guess i'll just want till he opens up for the new year and see how we go. he seems like a reasonable guy, the engineer reports states a critical fault that would have come up in the build stage so we'll just have to talk it out and see where it takes us.

Edited by SECURITY

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GTSBoy on your suggestion on another thread I had a look at those injectors and ended up getting them because of the quality.  Got the expensive ones.  
    • Hey guys been looking everywhere to try and find the correct gtr hood latch support part number but only found the first half and when I search with that number it sends me to an r34. The first part I found was 62515. If anyone could help me with the rest then I’d really appreciate it. Or if there’s some alternative hood latch support that would work even better cause I can’t find any for sale. (Searched on upgarage, partsouq,buyee,rhdjapan) 
    • If you've only done the upper control arms on the rear, AND you have changed their length (by more than about 1mm) to set the camber you want, then you will definitely need/want to install traction arms also. Adjusting the camber arms on their own WILL introduce bump steer and make the car unpleasant to drive. Most owners have no idea that their car could behave infinitely better than what they put up with. I'm not entirely sure what the Stageas need, but I am thinking that unless you have massive front spring rates and pretty soft rear springs, you have waaaay too much rear bar. Oversteer city, in my estimation. Combined with possible excessive bump steer from maladjusted arms, that could be a recipe for nastiness. ATR43SS2 is not a highflow. It is an outright replacement turbo. It's a little bit bigger than the largest highflow profile that Tao does. Probably a solid 300rwkW turbo where the bigger highflows will be about 30-40rwkW less. Nevertheless, we're only talking about ~300 rwkW, which is well within the abilities of the stock ECu to run with a Nistune on board. I would do so without hesitation - and I will be doing so when I get my finger out and actually get the injectors and AFM installed. But, if you would prefer to drop a whole lot more money on the ECU side, then I suspect you're looking at Haltech. The Haltech fanbois here will all spout on about all the available engine protection you can have, that you can't have with the Nistune option. And they're right. But it doesn't really come for free either. You will spend more money on extra sensors and the like, plus the work to install them. If the engine was built and therefore represented a big investment to protect, then I'd say definitely do it. If you view the current (and forever into the future) shortage of replacement engines as something to prompt similar protection, then also, do it. If you see a destroyed RB25 as an opportunity to put in a Mercedes or other V12 (like I kinda do)... then your perception of the risk/reward might differ. These are good injectors. You can also get a "better" set of the same with more flow matching, for more $$. 1000cc is where you will want to be. You will need an R35 AFM and adapter tube if you want to stay with Nistuned stock ECU. Otherwise, if going Haltech, you can ignore. As for intercooler. Just about anything will do. You're only talking about ~300rwkW. Just put a big core in there. Be aware that return flows do add significant pressure drop and will cost power and will make the turbo work harder to achieve the same goals. If you can manage a proper crossflow, do it. I'm keeping my very good return flow because I'm only expecting to be in the ~250rwkW range, and will live with whatever outcome I get.
    • I have a heap that i have collected if you want some authentic ones still. Pm me if your interested!
×
×
  • Create New...