Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

why would you ask that? do you think its tune related?

yeah...initial tune on a new engine is critical...if too rich the excessively fueled mixture will not allow the rings to bed. It seems to me the engine has seen too much fuel for an extended period...contaminated an already below par oiling system...and failed.

Id be having a chat with the builder of the engine and who did the initial tune Joe.

Edited by DiRTgarage
  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

why would you ask that? do you think its tune related?

Doesnt overfuelling = extra rich tune?? But then you're wideband said 11.5 to 12 - so that doesnt add up.

Going back to your original post, you had lifter noise at 2500-3000 - was that straight after you got the motor, ie before the oil had a chance to become contaminated? If so, i guess that's a symptom of oil pressure issues.

Incomplete combustion = too rich (the black smoke is the incompletely burnt fuel, its coming out as carbon instead of co2), or missfire (say if you had a dodgy spark plug or coil, but you'd notice that).

Dirt - is 11.5 too rich for a new motor?

Incomplete combustion = too rich (the black smoke is the incompletely burnt fuel, its coming out as carbon instead of co2), or missfire (say if you had a dodgy spark plug or coil, but you'd notice that).

Dirt - is 11.5 too rich for a new motor?

no my latest race engine was run-in at 11.5's

well the report certainly seems to pinpoint the cause so i would say you got your moneys worth there. the engineer seems to know what he was talking about and checked everything properly. hopefully it tells you what you wanted to know about how and why it died. :devil:

well the report certainly seems to pinpoint the cause so i would say you got your moneys worth there. the engineer seems to know what he was talking about and checked everything properly. hopefully it tells you what you wanted to know about how and why it died. :cheers:

yeah thats all i really wanted. he did a great job for a good price.

i also want to point out - if i didnt have the overfueling problem would the motor still have starved of oil if i hit a track day seeing as though there was a blockage of the oil pick-up? i never really noticed it as i didnt hit the higher revs very often. only time i heard anything was at WSID after a run, i heard what i now realise was lifter noise - i never really got to inspect it as by the time i got back to the pits the noise was gone.

Edited by SECURITY
So you know there was an oil control issue but do you know what caused it? Shouldn't the builder have been checking such things as he went along?

it just didnt occure to me that it was an oil problem, i even swung past the engine builder's workshop while i was in the area teling him that i was really happy with the motor etc etc - i figured that all rb's had noisy lifters and thats what it was, just the lifters playing up. but as you go along you start to piece things together, unfortunately for me it happened a bit too late.

sounds like you've also got a dented sump, and is messin up your oil pickup. That aint good. Bottom the sump out on something?

You make sure to not let the car idle too much too? idling often causes fuel wash, is shit for run ins.

Sorry to hear. bloody expensive.

sounds like you've also got a dented sump, and is messin up your oil pickup. That aint good. Bottom the sump out on something?

You make sure to not let the car idle too much too? idling often causes fuel wash, is shit for run ins.

Sorry to hear. bloody expensive.

nah no dent in the sump mate.

This is kind of my point also, though I didn't have the technical understanding, as I was pointing out that oil-control had been listed as an issue and that comes down to the builder.

I still think he's at fault here.

It may have been overfueling and ultimatly not run in correctly but doesnt that report also states that the incorrect or not suitable enough O ring was installed on the oil pick up??

I have seen many which dont have flat flanges but if you use a suitable sized O ring they seal perfectly fine.

Alot of pickups have slightly curved flanges so when the bolts are tightened down it puts tension on the O ring.

Whilst it may have not been run in properly it surely would have failed on the track at high rpm due to the oil pick up sucking air through a less than adequate O ring seal.....

That comes back to whoever assembled it not using the correct O ring in the correct position. From the way I read the report even if the tune was spot on for running in an engine in the the long run the faulty O ring would have caused the engines demise further down the track anyways, the contaminated oil mearly enhanced the problem???

It may have been overfueling and ultimatly not run in correctly but doesnt that report also states that the incorrect or not suitable enough O ring was installed on the oil pick up??

I have seen many which dont have flat flanges but if you use a suitable sized O ring they seal perfectly fine.

Alot of pickups have slightly curved flanges so when the bolts are tightened down it puts tension on the O ring.

Whilst it may have not been run in properly it surely would have failed on the track at high rpm due to the oil pick up sucking air through a less than adequate O ring seal.....

That comes back to whoever assembled it not using the correct O ring in the correct position. From the way I read the report even if the tune was spot on for running in an engine in the the long run the faulty O ring would have caused the engines demise further down the track anyways, the contaminated oil mearly enhanced the problem???

spot on...post of the thread

i just thought i'd add that when the car initially left the tuners, he even said himself that it was running a bit LEAN. on my way home i did some touch ups which saw the car on ~14.7 on idle (factory ecu settings as i run an emanage ultimate), and around 11.7-12.1 on low boost levels and around 14.5-14.7 (std ecu settings) on cruise. it wasnt the best tune but i wasnt taking it over 4000rpm anyway.

later on after the run-in period i got into trialing software which cleaned up my afr's more - which i have data logs of. my AFR's were never dangerously rich or lean at any point other than the drive home from the tuners. and if it was lean after turning some boost up, it was for 1 power run to input into the software then afr's were sweet again.

not his fault that the o-ring on the pick-up wasnt assembled properly?

i'll guess i'll just want till he opens up for the new year and see how we go. he seems like a reasonable guy, the engineer reports states a critical fault that would have come up in the build stage so we'll just have to talk it out and see where it takes us.

Edited by SECURITY

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When's the rear mounted turbo kit coming? Needs dose and V8 chop idle lol.
    • I was very unimpressed with how the car came up from the A pillar forward, before I hit things (twice). It all has to go. It had to go, but now it has to go... more. So we finally found the very first Shennanigans with the entirely perfectly setup engine that had no problems being pulled apart to improve on 'was perfectly fine'. Cam bearings looked a bit... stock. Which isn't entirely bad given they were stock and this is a ~20 year old engine. So new cam bearings are on the way because it's somewhat difficult to get to this stage to do it later, and it will trash the block. It was quite unusual that it wasn't done when the perfectly new-looking VCM cam was originally installed by [unknown] What IS unusual is the cam that was installed there was advanced SIX degrees. As to why there is no way to know.. however it could have been @Dose Pipe Sutututu's mate who wanted a larger cam sound but also wanted it to come on earlier to be more usable. This is my dyno sheet with the previous setup - This cam is not supposed to peak until 7000+ RPM, according to VCM. This is what lead me down the whole 'my heads/intake setup is running out of puff and can't support the cam' line of thinking to begin with. Anyway too late now - New cam is in! It could be rather funny if this smaller cam acts like a larger cam because it isn't advanced six degrees. In the spirit of everything is working amazingly - the COMP cam required no dialling in whatsoever. It was about 0.5 degrees advanced, which seems pretty bang on. Any adjustment either way would be further out. In the spirit of everything was previously working amazingly - The timing gear that was taken out turned out to be was an N-Motion double timing chain kit, with adjustable cam gear (which is how it was 6 degrees advanced) and all looks entirely perfectly new. It also had a Torrington bearing, which was one of the reasons I ended up getting the Cloyes kit which they used in the C5R 24 hour racecar - Because I couldn't confirm what was in the engine when talking to Tony Mamo. I did believe however it was a Double chain kit of some kind... but found no supporting documentation or evidence for it.
    • I recently did this to my R33 with the full set from Car Mats Direct, they can't do the vinyl anymore that's advertised on the website due to a supplier issue so I ended up with the Black Loop Pile which looks great. I went all out with rubber sound deadening sheets from Repco and also added the sound deadening foam layer option with the carpet. Makes a world of difference and got rid of all the weird smells in the 29 year old interior. It was a bit of work but I'd 100% recommend it, Car Mats Direct had awesome customer service and quick postage. Replaced my seats with some sporty ones from Autotechnia while I was at it, feels like a new car.
    • Got the motor out and torn down. I'll be dropping off the block Monday. Luckily the scoring on Cyl6 is much less pronounced then the pictures made it out to seem. It can barely be felt. If you pass your finger over it 10x you'll barely notice it. Hopefully by some chance it will only require a honing. I'm not in the mood to buy one size larger pistons or another block. Oddly enough my 6th cylinder with the scoring has extremely clean intake valves compared to my other 5 cylinders. I'm worried the scoring was caused by too much fuel or Water/Methanol washing the cylinder. I'll review some old logs to confirm.  This was also the first time I pull an engine with the transmission still attached. It went much better then expected. I was worried my CD009 wouldn't make it easy due to its sheer size but it was much easier this way. 
    • From the pictures I have when doing the job the flywheel is the same diameter, I don't think they're playing weird tricks like putting weights at the outer diameter to increase flywheel inertia or anything like that. The OEM flywheel is definitely heavier, but it's not a huge difference. Quoted weight savings of the clutch is 2 kg so I can't imagine the flywheel being lighter than ~7 kg. Kind of regret not weighing it before the clutch went into the car but as far as driveability goes I have no complaints.
×
×
  • Create New...