Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Last time I checked, Nitrous Oxide was a power adder and water wasn't. By that logic, a turbocharger is an 'extra' system. Clearly that's not what I'm talking about.

Drawing a long bow there dude. nitrous is as much an extra system as water meth, and achieves precisely the same result. Cooler combustion temps.

Dunno bout your car but mine came with a turbo charger. An "extra" system it most definitely is not.

(the fact that it no longer even closely resembles the factory "system" is totally irelevant) :P

Darren, you may well be right but it's adding another system into the mix and the more complex you make things, the more likely something is to go wrong. The way I see it, the E85 does a couple of things much better than regular pump unleaded and that's good enough for me and most people. Like anything though, it can be improved and that's where people might like to use a WMI kit as well. I've got enough confusion going on in my setup to bother though. :(

Ha,ha, i know what you saying!, but once you've used it you will never not be

able to have it again! , then again i would never use a kit that uses a pump anyway

i'm shit scared that they will stop working(because they all do, its a matter of time)

the only thing to go wrong on a system using boost pressure is that a solenoid didn't switch on,

but i have a light hooked up to it, to tell when it switches on

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31
Drawing a long bow there dude. nitrous is as much an extra system as water meth, and achieves precisely the same result. Cooler combustion temps.

Dunno bout your car but mine came with a turbo charger. An "extra" system it most definitely is not.

It isn't drawing a long bow at all. The primary function of nitrous oxide use in an internal combustion engine is to add extra oxygen and make more horsepower. It doesn't matter how long it's used for or in what fashion. This is its only application. One of the side effects of its use is that intake temperatures are reduced. This is not a primary concern in any application of automotive nitrous oxide. I agree that it is an extra system but only for the purposes of making my point in relation to water injection.

Water is most definitely not a power adder and it does not achieve "precisely the same result" as outlined above. Water cools the intake temps but that is all. It will not make more power in its own right and therefore it is irrelevant to compare it with nitrous oxide.

(the fact that it no longer even closely resembles the factory "system" is totally irelevant) :(

I lol'd! :)

Darren, how is your setup constructed? Boost pressure switch opening a solenoid? How is it jetted etc? Would love to see pics.

Water is most definitely not a power adder and it does not achieve "precisely the same result" as outlined above. Water cools the intake temps but that is all. It will not make more power in its own right and therefore it is irrelevant to compare it with nitrous oxide.
Water also reduces the heating during the compression stroke which is the largest part of the heat increase from ambient prior to ignition.

Not because it is cold, but because it is water..

less heating during compression means higher knock threshold means higher effective octane ratio means more advanced timing means more power.

I'm not sure which is more effective but I'd wager it is not the intake charge temp drop, but the decreased heat during compression. If you put on a 100% efficient intercooler, you still can't get the same result as water injection.

Water also reduces the heating during the compression stroke which is the largest part of the heat increase from ambient prior to ignition.

Not because it is cold, but because it is water..

less heating during compression means higher knock threshold means higher effective octane ratio means more advanced timing means more power.

I'm not sure which is more effective but I'd wager it is not the intake charge temp drop, but the decreased heat during compression. If you put on a 100% efficient intercooler, you still can't get the same result as water injection.

Be that as it may, water isn't now and will never be a power adder in and of itself.

Yeh just the usual switched on by a pressure switch, turns on 2 solenoids, one for air, one for water

and presurisses a tank which goes to a flow control valve then to a air/water atomiser

pre-turbo, never any sign of wear.

was controlable from 650-900hp of water flow, but riceracing has a trick valve now that will control

the same atomiser from 250-900hp, trick little valve and cheap to

cheers

darren

The way water/meth works (explained to me by an auto engineer) is the meth cools the intake temps and the water reduces detonation by squelching any hot spots in the chamber, it can make intake temps cooler by way of the intercooler but the meth does that job much better, just remember that water is like a solid and doesnt compress very well.

I agrre with the "extra system" idea and it is one more thing that can go wrong.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • it was good to see our presence at GTR festival..hope to see more SAU at these events 
    • This is awesome.     
    • Thanks for the quick replies guys its appreciated. A small extension was welded onto the standard 6boost external gate pipe which you can see where the pipe goes from black to stainless just below and to the right of the rear housing in the first picture. Overall I would say the flow is pretty good other than 6boosts choice to come straight off the collector at a decent angle.. Not sure why I went with two valves, I originally replaced the stock twin bovs with the GFB when I had the twins on. When I purchased the EFR it came with the Turbosmart Kompact BOV so I figured that would be a better option than the stock EFR Bov. I don't believe the Turbosmart BOV is adjustable? When I get the spike and then sudden dip in boost pressure, the turbo speed does drop as well. Stock head size wise however I believe it has Neo Turbo springs and a Neo Turbo intake camshaft and an aftermarket exhaust camshaft in the vicinity of 260 degrees. We didn't try a different MAC valve, we tried two different ways of plumbing it and we also tried removing the mac valve entirely and just having the boost source from the turbo directly connected to the wastegate and it still spiked / dropped and exhibited the same behaviour. Standard R33 GTR 5 speed tansmission. I'm running a Haltech Elite 2500 and can provide some logs if you. I understand what you're saying in that it looks like an auto plot however no, it's still a manual and it just has a lot of torque down low, for all intents and purposes it's a very impressive street car. I've attached a photo of the quickbitz dyno plot which was when the only difference is I was running -5 twin turbos with a mac valve. As you can see theres a decent dip in AFRs between 125kmh and 135kmh. Our problem now is not that the AFRs are dropping, just the boost pressure is dropping, however it is evident in the same RPM range of the map, coincidentally or not.
    • What transmission are you running?  It's a bit tricky with the scaling, but at face value the power "curve" looks more like a "line" which is a bit odd... basically a lot more like a dyno plot I'd expect with a highish (compared to a factory auto) stall torque converter type setup. If this is running an auto then this kind of boost control challenge is definitely a thing, the rpm scale on the dyno doesn't reflect what the engine is actually doing (unless the dyno has access to the engine's ACTUAL speed electronically) and what you'll get is a big rpm flare up as the engine torque launches past the converter pump's ability to resist torque at that rpm, then as the converter starts picking up rpm it will kinda even out again and the engine rpm will pick up more steadily. The trick with this "flare up" is if it's kinda near the boost threshold for the turbo then the engine's airflow requirements to maintain the previous boost level will outrun the turbo's ability to supply that boost - so you end up with a natural flattening off, if not dip when that happens.   If you are running closed loop, or even tune the "feed forward" wastegate duty cycle to deal with that rpm spike then when the engine starts settling to a more typical climb you'll actually have a situation where the gate is "too closed" and boost will run away for a bit, then have to pull down again.      It's not trivial to get this perfect as most boost control systems are generally expecting more predictable engine rpm rates of change, but if you *know* that's whats going on then you can at least "accept your fate" and realise getting that area perfect is kinda chasing your tail a bit, and assume that if the rest is working sensibly and the spike/dip isn't completely uncontrolled then you should be good. Sorry if I've gone off on a tangent, but the dyno plot and boost control behaviour look a LOT like what I've seen tuning autos in the past. What ECU are you running? Could possibly be convinced into looking at logs if I get too bored this weekend haha.
    • A few things that seem a bit off here. - why is there 2 BOV’s?  - the turbo smart BOV on the compressor housing, is it turned up ALL the way? I have seen this become an issue on old man Pete’s car. It would push open and recirc, turbo speed would rise and the boost pressure would do weird things. - stock head? Does that include springs? - tried a different MAC valve? Is it plumbed correctly?
×
×
  • Create New...