Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Last time I checked, Nitrous Oxide was a power adder and water wasn't. By that logic, a turbocharger is an 'extra' system. Clearly that's not what I'm talking about.

Drawing a long bow there dude. nitrous is as much an extra system as water meth, and achieves precisely the same result. Cooler combustion temps.

Dunno bout your car but mine came with a turbo charger. An "extra" system it most definitely is not.

(the fact that it no longer even closely resembles the factory "system" is totally irelevant) :P

Darren, you may well be right but it's adding another system into the mix and the more complex you make things, the more likely something is to go wrong. The way I see it, the E85 does a couple of things much better than regular pump unleaded and that's good enough for me and most people. Like anything though, it can be improved and that's where people might like to use a WMI kit as well. I've got enough confusion going on in my setup to bother though. :(

Ha,ha, i know what you saying!, but once you've used it you will never not be

able to have it again! , then again i would never use a kit that uses a pump anyway

i'm shit scared that they will stop working(because they all do, its a matter of time)

the only thing to go wrong on a system using boost pressure is that a solenoid didn't switch on,

but i have a light hooked up to it, to tell when it switches on

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31
Drawing a long bow there dude. nitrous is as much an extra system as water meth, and achieves precisely the same result. Cooler combustion temps.

Dunno bout your car but mine came with a turbo charger. An "extra" system it most definitely is not.

It isn't drawing a long bow at all. The primary function of nitrous oxide use in an internal combustion engine is to add extra oxygen and make more horsepower. It doesn't matter how long it's used for or in what fashion. This is its only application. One of the side effects of its use is that intake temperatures are reduced. This is not a primary concern in any application of automotive nitrous oxide. I agree that it is an extra system but only for the purposes of making my point in relation to water injection.

Water is most definitely not a power adder and it does not achieve "precisely the same result" as outlined above. Water cools the intake temps but that is all. It will not make more power in its own right and therefore it is irrelevant to compare it with nitrous oxide.

(the fact that it no longer even closely resembles the factory "system" is totally irelevant) :(

I lol'd! :)

Darren, how is your setup constructed? Boost pressure switch opening a solenoid? How is it jetted etc? Would love to see pics.

Water is most definitely not a power adder and it does not achieve "precisely the same result" as outlined above. Water cools the intake temps but that is all. It will not make more power in its own right and therefore it is irrelevant to compare it with nitrous oxide.
Water also reduces the heating during the compression stroke which is the largest part of the heat increase from ambient prior to ignition.

Not because it is cold, but because it is water..

less heating during compression means higher knock threshold means higher effective octane ratio means more advanced timing means more power.

I'm not sure which is more effective but I'd wager it is not the intake charge temp drop, but the decreased heat during compression. If you put on a 100% efficient intercooler, you still can't get the same result as water injection.

Water also reduces the heating during the compression stroke which is the largest part of the heat increase from ambient prior to ignition.

Not because it is cold, but because it is water..

less heating during compression means higher knock threshold means higher effective octane ratio means more advanced timing means more power.

I'm not sure which is more effective but I'd wager it is not the intake charge temp drop, but the decreased heat during compression. If you put on a 100% efficient intercooler, you still can't get the same result as water injection.

Be that as it may, water isn't now and will never be a power adder in and of itself.

Yeh just the usual switched on by a pressure switch, turns on 2 solenoids, one for air, one for water

and presurisses a tank which goes to a flow control valve then to a air/water atomiser

pre-turbo, never any sign of wear.

was controlable from 650-900hp of water flow, but riceracing has a trick valve now that will control

the same atomiser from 250-900hp, trick little valve and cheap to

cheers

darren

The way water/meth works (explained to me by an auto engineer) is the meth cools the intake temps and the water reduces detonation by squelching any hot spots in the chamber, it can make intake temps cooler by way of the intercooler but the meth does that job much better, just remember that water is like a solid and doesnt compress very well.

I agrre with the "extra system" idea and it is one more thing that can go wrong.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean it's probably likely that people overestimate their skills in dialling in a setup and noticing the changes. I had SK shocks and springs, and added heavier springs and got them revalved by Sydney Shocks to suit based upon what I told them I wanted the car to handle like. I got back a completely different feeling set of shocks, which probably (?) feel great on track but holy hell are they rough on tram tracks and the like. The shock dyno actually looks pretty similar to Shockworks (from what I can surmise from a screenshot of a youtube video - and my dyno printout...) Truth be told I doubt I'd be any faster or slower with either setup, or camber/castor combination. I also had whiteline eccentric castor bushes up front of my R34. I removed them and put in poly non-adjustable ones to soothe my OCD (nobody ever set the castor the same side to side, and it'd be near impossible to do) and be happy the wheel is centered in the well now for clearance reasons. Yes I wanted it to move 1mm 'back' :p I've effectively set my castor back to stock, negating all the benefits of that which is supposedly massive. I've probably also altered toe and camber in a negative (detrimental) way. I can't tell any difference steering the car.
    • You reckon? I have to disagree. Notwithstanding that at some point we may all be forced to do this to our cars if we want to keep driving them, there is absolutely nothing about an electric-converted-previously-IC-car that is ever good. EVs that are built by OEMs on platforms that were originally IC already suck, let alone the shitty outcomes that result from doing it as a retro to something that was actually built as an IC car. This is because the platform really needs to be designed to house the battery in a useful place (ie, down as low as possible) and the motors are properly located relative to the wheels that they have to drive. Converted platforms already suck at this. But when you try to shove sufficient battery capacity into a previously IC car, you can't put it down on/in the floor, because that space doesn't exist. You can't find enough space where the fuel tank used to be (if it is an inboard fuel tank) and you don't want to hang it out behind the rear axle line if you had a rear fuel tank. And there's not enough space in the tunnel if you still want to use it for anything remotely like what it was originally used for. The engine bay is too big for a motor, and you'd really prefer that the motor for the rear wheels wasn't in the front engine bay anyway. And there's not enough room where the diff was for a proper man-sized E motor. And then.... there is the complete lack of soul and emotion that is provided by EVs. There are some cracking restomods out there. Like the Alfaholics GTA thingo. But it is petrol powered. Look at the alternative EV version of a GTA restomod by Totem. it is jaw droppingly beautiful. But by all reports is is objectively awful to drive, despite having 600 HP or something, simply because there is nothing there. It sounds like a sewing machine or a leaf blower. It should scream and wail and make the hairs on your neck stand up. Oh, and it's 1500 bloody kg in a car that was <900kg when new. GTRs are heavy enough as it is without pushing them up to 2tonnes worth of pork.
    • https://www.dezeen.com/2025/01/06/nissan-electric-r32-skyline-gt-r-godzilla-sports-car/   I reckon this is pretty cool. Lots of other Resto mods have turned to ev power.
    • hahaha @joshuaho96 the most action it gets is when I have to drive from West to SE VIC to meet the fam. Even then, it;s on highway cruising speeds
    • don't know anyone in this thread, but i just found it, read the entire thing in a few hours, realized greg is still posting progress, and just have to say, this is awesome. it looks awesome. 100% right about the Uras kit making it a pain to get on hoists...have the same kit on my 34 and it takes six 2x4s and race ramps to do it without taking parts off. this reminds me exactly of this thread. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/build-projects-and-project-cars/r63-amg-the-unicorn-of-my-destruction/110824/page8/
×
×
  • Create New...