Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This thread reminds me of the bashing the blokes over at Performance forums gave my Silvia.. I was saying I didnt think FWD cars where sports cars. All the losers with their FWD Hondas piped up and went on about how shit Silvias are.

The internets such a wonderful reminder of how many dead shits there are in this world :)

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I have owned Four MX6's (all highly modified) as i do have a soft spot for them. They are luxurious and fun cars with a lot of options.

I have had a R32 and i have a R33 now so i am in a good position to comment on this.

The best i ever did with my MX6's was a 14.2 and that broke the gearbox.

On the street, 15 is the best they could possibly do.

There is no way they would get past a stock Skyline no matter how modified they are.

As i said, they are a nice car but they are no street racer.

I am a member of the MX6 forums over there so i might reply there too.

Yeah, is pretty funny.. Alot of peple can dish it out, and not really have an understanding on what there talking about.. hehe funny stuff.. Well, anyways.. Im an owner of the mx6.. and to say the least, am proud of the car. I also own my 32 aswell.. And, by far, the mx has no chance over the 32. But, they are both two very different cars.. The mx being a turbo front wheel drive, and the 32 a turbo rear wheel.. Id say the car he beat was a non turbo.. theres just no way he would eb able to beat any skyline.. i know that for fact.. i have done test's.. I must adnit though.. there is one mx6 that does and can beat my 32.. it has slight booost, 3inch exhaust blah blah.. and my 32 being stock, the mx pulls away from the line, and i par with him in speed, but cannot pass. MIght be my driving style.. brass button.. But, to get those sorta times from an mx, ie 14'98, is very good.. not too many can get low like that without major modifications.. As mrrb20 said.. there more of a cruise family car.. they are actually a turbo 626 in two door format. the mx came out from 89-92.. the front turbo models..The only problem they have is severe torque steer.. just somepeople are a bit over eager in there claims i guess..!?

HA HA!!.. just read through it again.. thats the funniest thing ive seen for a long time! HA HA!:bahaha:

I don't know what your sniffing, but it seems that R32's and R33's are now no match for the MX6.
I have witnesses to say that when my MX6 was stock, I knocked off two R33's. One was manual, and it was a battle for a lane, so only a 20 metre run really. The other was a friends auto and we had lots and lots of runs. I had him in every aspect. From 0 - 190.
With the extra boost I'm now sporting, I can say it would be an easy win.
I have very similiar mods to timtx5 who pulls 14.8 1/4 mile. I don't know any stock skylines who can do that.
I've never seen a stock R32 crack anything lower than a 15.4, and the quickest stock R33 I've seen cracked a 14.9 (altho it had slicks) and I frequent the street drags at willowbank.  

So I think your times for skylines are a little off.

Lights go green and off we go, Bye Bye show pony..........
Have you even been in a MX6? I doubt it...  

Why don't you go to bed sonny, you have school tomorrow.

so to lex, where u at boy? if ur in melb id like to see u on the street. but if u got an r32 gts-t ill just laugh at u! man i am in a bitchy mood!

sorry had to do it, for those of you who cant be bothered checking the link..here a a few examples what the thread contains...enjoy...

what a load of shit.

Originally posted by Parag0n

pentae, and also how many keyboard warriors there are, until they meet you face to face, thats a diferent story :wave:

keyboard warriors :bahaha: i want to be a keyboard samuri

Originally posted by mtopxsecret6

Basicly, you have captured clips from both post's.. And, they both dwindled down into a flame against the first gen, and second gen.. tsk tsk.. very stupid..

I think you're missing the point here. It wasn't anything to do with 2nd Gen at all but then again..there were SOME 1st Gen people who decided to dwindle it into a flame. It all started with MX6 1st gen vs R32. And how some twits decide that their 1st gen cars were the supercars of the world.

LOL now that is funny.

I used to own a 88' TX5 2.2 n/a blah blah blah.

I looked long and hard about either putting in a 2.2l turbo motor in it, or just sell it and get a turbo TX5 or MX6.

But for the cost it just wasn't worth it. I think stock they are about 110kw (at the motor !) and in a car full of all the nice gear the weight is up around ~1350kg.

Sure they go 'OK', but I can tell you now that there is no way that a mildly mod'd MX6 (say 170kw) would beat a R33 with just exhaust and a bit of boost.

You just need to do the figures. 170kw and 1350kg (MX6) and say 200kw and 1380kg (R33).

Plus the fact that the TX5/MX6 are front wheel drive and traction is a BIG issue...

I'm not saying the R33's are the fastest thing on the road cause there's plenty of beasts out there, but these guys just think their MX6's are the best thing since sliced bread !!

One day they'll have a proper run against a R32 and R33 and then they'll realise. But I can bet my last dollar they won't tell their mates that they got beaten by one :)

Oh BTW: yes I realised that the R33 was better than the TX5/MX6 and that's why I sold it and bought a R33 :wave:

[/whinge off]

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, pretty much what you said is a good summary. The aftermarket thing just attached to the rim, then has two lines out to valve stems, one to inner wheel, one to outer wheel. Some of the systems even start to air up as you head towards highway speed. IE, you're in the logging tracks, then as speeds increase it knows you're on tarmac and airs up so the driver doesn't even have to remember. I bet the ones that need driver intervention to air up end up seeing a lot more tyre wear from "forest pressures" in use on the highway!
    • Yes, but you need to do these type certifications for tuning parts. That is the absurd part here. Meaning tuning parts are very costly (generally speaking) as well as the technical test documentation for say a turbo swap with more power. It just makes modifying everything crazy expensive and complicated. That bracket has been lost in translation many years ago I assume, it was not there.
    • Hahaha, yeah.... not what you'd call a tamper-proof design.... but yes, with the truck setup, the lines are always connected, but typically they sit just inside the plane of the rear metal mudguards, so if you clear the guards you clear the lines as well. Not rogue 4WD tracks with tree branches and bushes everywhere, ready to hook-up an air hose. You can do it externally like a mod, but dedicated setups air-pressurize the undriven hubs, and on driven axles you can do the same thing, or pressurize the axles (lots of designs out there for this idea)... https://www.trtaustralia.com.au/traction-air-cti-system/  for example.... ..the trouble I've got here... wrt the bimmer ad... is the last bit...they don't want to show it spinning, do they.... give all the illusion that things are moving...but no...and what the hell tyre profile is that?...25??? ...far kernel, rims would be dead inside 10klms on most roads around here.... 馃槂
    • You're just describing how type certification works. Personally I would be shocked to discover that catalytic converter is not in the stock mounting position. Is there a bracket on the transfer case holding the catalytic converter and front pipe together? If so, it should be in stock position. 
    • You talking about the ones in the photo above? I guess that could make sense. Fixed (but flexible) line from the point up above down to the hubcap thingo, with a rotating air seal thingo. Then fixed (but also still likely flexible) line from the "other side" of the transfer in the hub cap thingo up to the valve stem on the rim. A horrible cludge, but something that could be done. I'd bet on the Unimog version being fed through from the back, as part of the axle assembly, without the need for the vulnerable lines out to the sides. It's amazing what you can do when you have an idea that is not quite impossible. Nearly impossible, but not quite.
  • Create New...