Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well my theory is that the turbo to IC pipe should be bigger then IC to throttle for 1 reason:

1. Hot air takes up more space then cold air (i.e. is less dense, therfore requires a bigger space to flow the same volume of air)

There are more reasons (and theories) to why i think this setup is better, however that is the main reason.

I just can see how having a smaller pipe (say 2") from the turbo to IC and then a massive (say 3" pipe) from IC to throttle. Why would this setup be better if it is? Can anyone shed any light on this?

Originally posted by zforce

Well my theory is that the turbo to IC pipe should be bigger then IC to throttle for 1 reason:

1. Hot air takes up more space then cold air (i.e. is less dense, therfore requires a bigger space to flow the same volume of air)

I thought it was the other way around

zforce is right with hot air taking up more space than cold air - hot air particles are agitated and thus expand. However, i believe that the reason the piping from the cooler to the throttle is larger than piping from the turbo to the cooler is for a couple of reasons:

1. the smaller the diameter of the pipe after the turbo (within reason, that is, not to try and force it through a maccas straw), the higher the pressure and the faster the fluid velocity. Fast velocity = good for flow to the cooler. While it will be hotter than in a pipe of larger diameter (remember that as air cools it reduces in vol and as air is warmed it takes up more volume), the cooler is designed to shed this extra (if any) heat.

2. After the IC, if the cooler has done its job the air will be significantly cooler than before the cooler. This air hence takes up less volume, and is slower in velocity. However due to the vacuum effect of the intake when the throttle is open (ie. how a N/A car 'sucks' its intake air charge), this reduction in velocity is minimal.

3. Now for point 2 i've said that the air takes up less volume, and the less volume it takes up, the less pressure it is at. This may have a 'pulling' effect on air travelling through the intercooler - remember that air naturally moves from high pressure to low pressure - effectively helping flow of hot air through the cooler.

Hope that is clear... bye :wavey:

Thanks Ronin 09,

Sorry to jump off topic,

I am running a "cut & shut" RB26/25 intake manifold, (il post some pics later)

would that type of setup cost more, than say the standard RB25 Intake setup? Or will they be about the same?

Also will the price inlcude silicon joiners & clamps?

Unsure if that includes silicon joiners, but it is complete. I would guess that if you want silicon joiners it may cost a bit more (they're about 100 bucks each!).

I would again assume that your cut n shut should cost (marginally if any) less as the piping is shorter. Either way they'll have to hack a hole anyway.

Hi Guys, I have a very good reason for gradually increasing the size of the intercooler pipework as the air moves from the turbo to the throttle body. Nissan do it, and they spent heaps on research.

Everybody explains airflow like it's in slow motion. At 4,000 rpm an RB25 at 1 bar will swallow all of the air in the inlet system in less than 1/20th of a second. At that velocity I don't believe 80 degree air (before I/C) is much different to 30 degree air (after I/C). Taking pressure reading proves this to be the case, there isn't any difference unless there is I/C restriction. If the hot air vs cold air made any noticeable difference in pressure, then you would be able to see it, and I never have. So in my opinion too small to worry about.

MrRB20, asked "how much on average would it be to pipe the cooler seeing it is a custom intercooler and the intake and outtake are on different sides unlike the standard cooler which is on the same size ??"

I do my own in aluminium (straight and donuts), silicone (hose) and stainless steel clamps, the materials usually ends up around $500 including about $80 for welding.

Hope that helps

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It's kind of interesting - They definitely do builds that split the difference between what they like and what will generate views and engagement. The NC Platform always surprises everyone in a good way, in an uncomfortably good way some may say. They could throw a LS in there and arguably have the best (and best performing) car of the entire stable. But that isn't necessarily what draws views, because people viewing don't want to accept the vegetables of a LS NC MX5 being a superior vehicle in every way (including fun) than a RB26 240Z. This is also why there's not a lot of content about the GR Yaris (on the web in general). They're too good, yet 'only a Yaris' The community doesn't want certain cars to be as good as they are - to beat their hero cars, and I believe the NC MX5 is absolutely one of those cars.
    • Yeah - My key still does the chime thing. I followed the procedure but it didn't activate on the (identical) third set of keyfob that I had. I vaguely remember the alarm saying you can only pair two keys with it. Now that I've dug it up, it appears that you very much can pair keyfobs to the alarm system. (which are the fobs I use to unlock the car). I have successfully diverted the thread and can probably not use the OEM keyfob ever again unless I use the aftermarket alarm and attempt to pair the OEM keyfob to it. Which might just work, or not :D. I definitely used the nissan method and not the aftermarket alarm method.
    • What makes it worse is that Nissan made keys in the same style, for example R34 and Stagea, but they work at different frequencies or something like that. So they look the same but the remotes are not interchangeable. I learned that from some guy selling aftermarket blank keys.
    • Does your door chime work when you have the key in the lock and open the door? I've had that disabled because it's f**king annoying and it is one thing that messes with the pairing. Because now the car doesn't detect key in ignition anymore and the slide-key-in-and-out sequence does not trigger the pairing mode anymore. The service manual has a section on the various bits involved in doing the syncing. I presume it'll be similar between Stagea and R34.
    • Agree, but meh, I think is is based more on LOLS than actually apples to apples, like, who would have thunk a turbo 4 cylinder would not beat a NA 4 cylinder  I think with just basic N/A mods, like a exhaust and tune, it would be equal to the Mini in its current form, maybe I know my current 2.5 would "chop the mini" as the midrange now has a night and day difference in power delivery compared to the tuned 2.0, by around 20kwatw and 30nm from around 2k rpm "ish"....... I'm kinda hoping that they do a N/A build, either with the MZR 2.0 or with whatever they decide to use If I recall correctly they did talk about K swapping one a while ago
×
×
  • Create New...