Jump to content
SAU Community

Pga-sa Interclub Dyno Day #3 - 14th March 2009!


car_fanatica
 Share

Recommended Posts

Here's my dyno sheet from the PGA dyno day. The engine has not even looked like suffering detonation running as lean as lambda 0.86-0.88. Also take note that my peak torque figure is down on yours, Lee. Boost comes on earlier and hits harder than mine so I'm guessing that's the main factor.

Hey Matt,

Cheers for posting your sheet up as i was interested in seeing what difference our tunes would show up on the dyno. Apparently you can run as lean as .90 before you start losing torque with E85 which goes to show how forgiving the fuel really is. Does your Microtech run the VCT?

Not too sure if GWW is reading correct or not but would have definately been interested to see Adrians car on there. Wait til next DD i guess.

I read your post on GT's thread and got me thinking i should maybe ring Enffue to see if they can shed any light on the matter. Long story short the Manager was nice enough to return my call stating they have over 1000 ltrs at the moment and are expecting another delivery next week. As to the future of E85 at their station he said he was under the impression that they will continue supplying the fuel. Next few weeks will tell the story i guess with the receivership, cant say i'm overly enthused on paying $2 plus for a litre.

Lee

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 305
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hey Lee,

No prob's mate. Good old E85 :woot: Yep, NVCS is still operational. Built bottom end with low comp' is part of the reason for the difference in response between our set-ups.

I've seen reports from people that have used both dyno's that show one and then the other reads higher/lower. I know on one thing for sure, a dyno figure is just a number. Yeah be good to see how Adrian's car goes on the GWW dyno now.

From your latest info' on the Mawson Lakes ENFFUE station it sounds a little more promising that it first appeared. Fingers crossed the news continues to improve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey guys, thought you might like to see some pics!

208 photos un-edited on photobucket HERE

3* photos edited on Flickr HERE each photo on Flickr has a larger 1080x version!

*will end up being more, thats just all I've edited as of right now! I only started editing this arvo!

preview:

3389576382_8af2d451b9_o.jpg

3388914127_eb28294970_o.jpg

3388930363_9a3d81fb0d_o.jpg

If anyone wants larger versions of any of the photo's, pm me here or email [email protected]

Cheers,

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chris mate those pics look the shit mate

they are awesom....good job on the pics mate

now kicking myself

should have studied photoshop when i had the chance too

thats what you get for skipping classes then....damn it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wow its been a while since Ive signed in for sure.  Time gets away... Good question. So much was different between the two designs.  The RB315 was a test to see if I could do it.  Limitations were for the most part due to local machining capability.  Tolerances were an issue.  The 3.15 used a single OD dry sleeve, and was almost the same as a kakimoto spacer plate engine, except I used a plate design similar to the OS Giken plate.  I did not make the top flanges thick enough either.  I can't be sure if it was machining tolerances, or thermal distortion of the sleeves, but the engine did produce quite a bit of blow by.  The modified 87mm RB30 crank was also an issue, and was no where near as nicely balanced as the forged 90mm crank in the 3.4. The 34 was a next level build.  The sleeves were stepped for max thickness, and were a semi-wet design breaking though into coolant completely in the block.  Minimum thickness was 3.75mm and max was 5mm with the 90mm bore, and the new spacer plate also fully supported the tops of the sleeves closed deck style.  This combined with far superior CNC machining, and a cylinder hone finish that the machinist does on 3000hp pro stock cars resulted in no noticeable blow by at all.   In the end the 3.15 was removed to swap in the 3.4.  I discovered the modified RB30 crank had partially sheared the woodruff key on the balancer.  That was all that was wrong with it, but it did make the engine a paperweight at that stage. $1100 to make another crank for an engine with blow by issues was not worth it, considering I'd started playing with all Nitto forged internals instead. I hope you found this interesting.   Cheers, Ian
    • All their parts, when order directly off them are made to order. So you're able to customise fitment of things or delete things. E.g. I asked for no throttle cable bracket, no IACV port, etc. on my plenum. In hindsight, I should have asked for an IAT port/fitting welded on, hindsight no. Should have bought a M2 or 3 lol.
    • 25de in c33 a31 is different to r32/r33 s1 which is different to r33 s2 & r34 so you can vaguely do whatever man.
    • That's the pink sticker type, you haven't said what car so no idea if it's correct, 25de or det is the same in the same model.
×
×
  • Create New...