Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Here's my dyno sheet from the PGA dyno day. The engine has not even looked like suffering detonation running as lean as lambda 0.86-0.88. Also take note that my peak torque figure is down on yours, Lee. Boost comes on earlier and hits harder than mine so I'm guessing that's the main factor.

Hey Matt,

Cheers for posting your sheet up as i was interested in seeing what difference our tunes would show up on the dyno. Apparently you can run as lean as .90 before you start losing torque with E85 which goes to show how forgiving the fuel really is. Does your Microtech run the VCT?

Not too sure if GWW is reading correct or not but would have definately been interested to see Adrians car on there. Wait til next DD i guess.

I read your post on GT's thread and got me thinking i should maybe ring Enffue to see if they can shed any light on the matter. Long story short the Manager was nice enough to return my call stating they have over 1000 ltrs at the moment and are expecting another delivery next week. As to the future of E85 at their station he said he was under the impression that they will continue supplying the fuel. Next few weeks will tell the story i guess with the receivership, cant say i'm overly enthused on paying $2 plus for a litre.

Lee

  • Replies 305
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hey Lee,

No prob's mate. Good old E85 :woot: Yep, NVCS is still operational. Built bottom end with low comp' is part of the reason for the difference in response between our set-ups.

I've seen reports from people that have used both dyno's that show one and then the other reads higher/lower. I know on one thing for sure, a dyno figure is just a number. Yeah be good to see how Adrian's car goes on the GWW dyno now.

From your latest info' on the Mawson Lakes ENFFUE station it sounds a little more promising that it first appeared. Fingers crossed the news continues to improve.

Hey guys, thought you might like to see some pics!

208 photos un-edited on photobucket HERE

3* photos edited on Flickr HERE each photo on Flickr has a larger 1080x version!

*will end up being more, thats just all I've edited as of right now! I only started editing this arvo!

preview:

3389576382_8af2d451b9_o.jpg

3388914127_eb28294970_o.jpg

3388930363_9a3d81fb0d_o.jpg

If anyone wants larger versions of any of the photo's, pm me here or email [email protected]

Cheers,

Chris

Chris mate those pics look the shit mate

they are awesom....good job on the pics mate

now kicking myself

should have studied photoshop when i had the chance too

thats what you get for skipping classes then....damn it

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...