Jump to content
SAU Community

So There I Was Driving An R35 Gt-r....


Recommended Posts

Yes, there I was driving an R35 GT-R all last weekend at the Oran Park V8 supertaxis, mostly around the pits, but I got 1 lap of the gp circuit.

Aaaanyway, spotted a young gent by the name of Dan, who, apparently, has something to do with this site.

So he's now had a drive too.

Nissan Australia loaned it to the Nissan Historic Race Team for a bit of solidarity, we had a few Gibson cars competing there in the GrpA/GrpC historics.

Nissan Exa turbo, Bluebird turbo, PJ DR30 Skyline, 2 x HR31 Skylines, & the #1 Winfield GT-R Godzilla.

It was a pre production Australian spec car. Red premium with the leather, Bose stereo and good tyres.

A couple of facts.

It does have launch control, but if you use it too many times, some things will no longer be covered by warranty.

It has no speed limiter.

It is really easy to drive- you could send your granny to the shops for milk in it.

It's really fast. Really!

This particular car will end up being crushed.

I already offered another red car to be crushed if I could keep this one. No dice.

This is a pic of me looking really smug

Hooks

post-755-1229055538_thumb.jpg

Edited by 31GUN
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/248666-so-there-i-was-driving-an-r35-gt-r/
Share on other sites

Acording to Top gear UK "It does infact have a speed limiter, but the Sat nav tells the ECU that its at a race track. and simply turns the limiter off"

i thought that was race tracks in japan only? unless they put all racetracks from the world on :s

aaaaaaaaaaaand y do they have 2 crush it? ill swap em if they want?

Acording to Top gear UK "It does infact have a speed limiter, but the Sat nav tells the ECU that its at a race track. and simply turns the limiter off"

I dont think the aussie cars will have this feature - they just wont have a (180km/hr) limiter at all.

i thought that was race tracks in japan only? unless they put all racetracks from the world on :s

aaaaaaaaaaaand y do they have 2 crush it? ill swap em if they want?

Having delt with pre-production cars that get registered and sold in the past best thing to do with them is crush them, they are usually test mules for the press to drive and a full of flaws, things are put together differently and usually slapped together, parts catelogues and tech info dont recognise the VIN and makes it a pain to work on. Sad, unforunte but true

Cobb will take care of the speed limiter regardless so I don't think it really matters does it? Hey GUN31 did the guys at Nissan Aust. tell you what they thought was 'too many times' as far as using the LC was? And the parts that would not be covered if you did use it too many times? I'm assuming the tranny?

Edited by GT-R OZ
Acording to Top gear UK "It does infact have a speed limiter, but the Sat nav tells the ECU that its at a race track. and simply turns the limiter off"

That is true in Japan models. For models sold outside Japan there is no 180kmh speed limiter.

That was most certainly an Australian spec GT-R as you can tell it's the only market where popup HID washers are seen so far. Not checked if the Euro one has them too but I suspect it might.

Acording to Top gear UK "It does infact have a speed limiter, but the Sat nav tells the ECU that its at a race track. and simply turns the limiter off"

That will be an awesome trick given the Australian car doesn't even have Sat Nav!!

I think you'll find the Oz car just doesn't have a limiter....

wtf would they crush it? I mean really, with all the starving kids around the world, why do they not raffle it as a non road going car and give the proceeds to charity.

Nissan FTL

By that logic we should all be driving the cheapest car available, probably something 50 years old. And instead of posting this using my 22 inch monitor i'd be using an old CGA 12 inch.

No speed limiter according to the Nissan guy.

He even suggested putting it on a dry lake to see how fast.

As for how many launches? Don't know.

All he said was overseas they are getting bent bits and broken bits because of this.

I would hazard a guess that they have not decided how many yet, and of course the ecu records all launches.

Craig Lowndes was really interested in the car too. Came and looked at it twice. (should have offered HIM a drive)

Hooks

you are a sexxy beast hooks. and can't believe you didn't give me a drive. I was there on sunday. butthole.

still i can't be too upset i'm unpacking one out of it's container tomorrow or wednesday. :) the last one i'm importing. :)

good work mate and glad you like it.

Yes Hooks, I do owe you big time my friend... I was shaking after driving it... AWESOME car... I'm still talking about it...

Now to remember how to post pictures... and if only the skid pan was empty... I think we could have cracked 2.5 g acceleration from a rolling start... lol. (I would have been happy to spend all day trying...)

This particular car will end up being crushed.

I already offered another red car to be crushed if I could keep this one. No dice.

Don't blame Nissan!!! This is a tax office directive. Basically, the vehicles can be brought in and used for a year. After that year, they have to be destroyed, and on production of proof that the vehicle has been crushed, they get a nice tax refund on the car... Has been going on for years with lots of really nice cars going to the crusher. Aston's, Jag's etc....

The pre build and product test cars often do not have complience plates and therefore cannot be sold anyway.

In another twist, Vic Roads have also changed their rules and PT cars can now only be driven by employees of that manufacturer. They now have a Marketing Eval type rego.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think my main complaint with your idea is that there is a veneer of idealism spread across it. You want the simple numbers to make it easier, but all they will do is make it easier for someone to come to the wrong conclusion because the fine details will kick them in the nuts. As it is right now, the tiny bit of arithmetic is NOT the obstacle to understanding what will fit and what will not fit. The reality of trying it is what determines whether it will fit. If you had a "standard rule" that R34 GTT guards have that magic 100mm space from the hub face to whichever side you were worried about, and someone said "excellent, this wheel is only 98mm in that direction, I'll just go spend $4k on them and jam them on my sick ride".....they would just as likely find out that the "standard rule" is not true because the rear subframe is offset to one side by a fairly typical (but variable) 8mm on their car and they only have 92mm on one side and 108 on the other.
    • It still combines inches with mm, especially when you have .5 inches involved, and mm and inches that can go in either direction. This would give a clear idea on both sides of the rim, right away, with no arithmetic. Even better if somebody gives you the dimensions of the arch of multiple cars. i.e GTR may be 125mm, a A80 Supra may be 117mm, or something along those lines. Yes, you can 'know' that going from a 10in rim to a 10.5in rim with the same offset moves both sides about 6mm, but you still have to 'know' that and do the math. Often it's combined. People are going from 9.5 +27 to 10.5 +15. You may do the math to know it, but if it was going from (I had to go look it up to be sure) 241mm/2 - 27 - 93.5mm from the center line to (more math) 266/2 - 15 (118mm) from the center line. Versus 93mm vs 118mm. It's right there. If you know you have a GTT with 100mm guards you can see right away that one is close to flush and the other absolutely won't work. And when someone says "Oh the GTR is 120mm" suddenly you see that the 10.5 +15 is about perfect. (or you go and buy rims with approximately 118mm outward guard space) I think it's safe to say that given one of the most common questions in all modified cars is "How do offsets work" and "How do I know if wheels will fit on my car" that this would be much simpler... Of course, nothing will really change and nobody is going to remanufacture wheels and ditch inches and offset based on this conversation :p We'll all go "18x9+30 will line up pretty close to the guards for a R34 GTT (84mm)" but 'pretty close' is still not really defined (it is now!) and if you really care you still have go measure. Yes it depends on camber and height and dynamic movement, but so do all wheels no matter what you measure it for.
    • But offsets are simple numbers. 8" wheel? Call it 200mm, near enough. +35 offset? OK, so that means the hub face is that far out from the wheel centreline. Which is 2s of mental arithmetic to get to 65mm to outer edge and 135mm to inner. It's hardly any more effort for any other wheel width or offset. As I said, I just close my eyes and can see a picture of the wheel when given the width and offset. That wouldn't help me trust that a marginal fitment would actually go in and clear everything, any more than the supposedly simple numbers you're talking about. I dunno. Maybe I just automatically do numbers.
    • Sure! But you at least have simple numbers instead of 8.5 inches +/mm, relative to your current rims you do maths with as well, and/or compare with OEM diameter, which you also need to know/research/confirm..
×
×
  • Create New...