Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys i got an r32 GTR with a Garett t04z turbo, 60mm wastegate, 260 poncams and Vipec ECU.

And i got it tuned but there isnt enough fuel available, i could only get 260awkw at 13psi with the injectors maxing out.

I got a Sard 280ltr pump, Sard 700cc injectors and standard fuel rail and lines.

What could be the problem?

as above tai... i'd be looking at things in the fuel system before the injectors that are holding them back... 480 cc injectors can flow 260rwkw

as stevo suggested but also fpr, fuel filter and pump relay

Im not really sure, but my brother (whos tuning the car) said the injectors are at 95% duty cycle via what it says on the Tuning software.

I find it odd as i had 240awkws at 15psi using stock injectors and stock pump? now i've upgraded and only slightly done better?

Theres lots of fuel in the tank, lines seem to be unhindered, as i never touched it since my stock setup.. might have to check the fuel filter. Is there a way of knowing if its blocked?

Just that its running at 95% at the top end of the rev range, and cannot boost or tune further until this problem is resolved.

Thanks for the help guys :P

Tai

Did they leave the standard fuel reg on, pump side just under the inside of the fuel tank cap?

I believe they did, I remember the pump i brought had the gold colored reg thing still attached to it, and they removed that one and used the one that was already on the stock pump i think?

there is no reg attached to the pump. and no reg in the fuel tank so i'm not sure what 666Dan is talking about?

what is the AFR? you can make any injector max out at any power level if you don't mind AFRs around 9:1! lol. more info needed to sort through this one I think.

I believe they did, I remember the pump i brought had the gold coloured reg still attached to it, and they removed that one and used the one that was already on the stock pump i think?

They should have retained the brass one for sure, the stock one is a plastic piece of crap :P

Richard, my pump had a reg on it....purple plastic thing right up the top of the outgoing fuel line, I got a nice replacement one with the GTR pump.

there is no such thing in an R32 GTR. there is an anti drain back valve on the pump. but there is only one fuel pressure reg in the whole system, and it's on the return end of the fuel rail.

I'll have to find out more info, but just got off the fone with my bro he said the AFR's are around the 12-13 (safe) all the way throught the rev range on the 13psi its at now, but once boosted more it wants to lean out.. so its set on 13psi.

He's tuned heaps of cars alot more powerful than mine, so i don't doubt him.

OK...well there is one in the R34, I had to call Nissan to check what it was and they said it was a primary fuel reg on the feed line (it's definately on the feed in my car)

I even just checked the workshop manual, complete break down of the fuel pump side, shows the two halves of the pipe but doesn't show the reg thing in line....bloody Nissan left it out *shakes fist*

So stock fuel reg?

Here's what ive added to a stock fuel system in a gtr, compare your parts;

-Intank 044 bosch

-SARD f.p.r.

-SARD injectors (same)

Just by doing that it did 355kw atw at something like (from memory, probably wrong) 70% duty cycle. I remember the fuel system had a shitload more in it

As BB said, more info

OK...well there is one in the R34, I had to call Nissan to check what it was and they said it was a primary fuel reg on the feed line (it's definately on the feed in my car)

well there is some gold dangly thing, but it's not a reg like the other one is. it has no pressure feed. and it's on the supply line. so if anything it restricts flow (and if it was doing that it would LOWER pressure in the feed after it). but most likely it's anti drain back valve.

candy33, i would get your brother to check that he has setup the injectors correctly on the ECU, he could be confusing a value of 95 on the fuel map as being 95% duty. what is the master value set to? (XXms)

on this image where is it showing 95?

post-32350-1229061099_thumb.jpg

basically with the sard pump, stock lines, stock wiring, stock reg and sard injectors you should be able to support 350kw+. so something is wrong. either the software is not accurate and you don't really have 95% duty, or you do have 95% duty, but don't need to (ie your AFR is stupid rich), or something is not installed correctly.

I will get you more info soon guys.

Yes its running stock fuel reg, fuel rail and lines.

My brothers have built and tuned several other GTR's using the stock fuel reg, fuel rail and lines for near 400awkws, so i can't seem to see how that could be my problem.

He did say that my turbo ramps up really quick with about 80% of the power coming in the vicinity of a thousand rpm, which could be the cause of it not keeping up.

But yeah i'll stop speculating and do more investigating.

Thanks guys

candy33, i would get your brother to check that he has setup the injectors correctly on the ECU, he could be confusing a value of 95 on the fuel map as being 95% duty. what is the master value set to? (XXms)

on this image where is it showing 95?

post-32350-1229061099_thumb.jpg

Thanks for that Titan, i will find out for you asap.

Cheers

well there is some gold dangly thing, but it's not a reg like the other one is. it has no pressure feed. and it's on the supply line. so if anything it restricts flow (and if it was doing that it would LOWER pressure in the feed after it). but most likely it's anti drain back valve.

Maybe regulator was the wrong wording, yes it's a flow restrictor. Most people just bugger the thing off as it's got no place in a real car :)

I was thinking in terms of it restricting fuel supply into the lines, the injectors not getting the pressure behind them as they're draining the post restrictor fuel off too quickly, as a result low line pressure is seeing duty cycle increase as it's having to be high to meet the challenge.

First things first

Stock fuel reg, rail & lines are fine for massive power, so its not a problem there in that sense

So if the injectors are maxing out, something is impeading flow.

I would look at

1. Pump voltage - is the pump getting the required volts (stock wiring is NO good).

2. Fuel Filter - is it a decent flowing one? Is the fuel filter perhaps blocked?

3. Fuel Hose - has it been changed at some point? Is it large enough etc etc.

4. Fuel Pump - is it mounted correctly? Is there 110% certainty there is nothing potentially blocking the pickup?

5. Fuel lines - Are some of them bent/kinked perhaps which would possibly cause problems?

6. Fuel pressure - Has this been checked and confirmed to be correct?

Check those things, and also the other stuff about the "95" value actually being 95% Duty.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As you're looking at using a Link ECU, then large injectors are not a problem. But there's not really any need to go 1000s on an RB20 unless you're planning >>600HP on E85, which would seem unlikely. There are other options for injectors. The Xspurt ones are available from a number of places and you can get them in the mid 600s and 725cc, which is probably a sensible place to be. These are all EV14 based. If you are not using the stock AFM (at all, which would be the case with a Link) then a large turbo intake pipe to suit the ATR turbos is not an obstacle, so you should use one instead of a highflow. Results will be better.
    • Hey guys,  I'm after some advice and this here is the best place to get it imo. I was a member a looong time ago under another account, with a lost email address. Its nice to jump back on and see some of the same names still giving good advice.  I mothballed my car when i moved to perth in 2013, and after getting towed across the nullabor a few times it has officially done more km's on a trailer than under its own power. Now that i have started the process of tidying up and modifying it, i see the fruit available (and the fruiterers selling the produce) is different than back in the day. hence my questions, as i used to 'know' what to get and now, i'm not so sure. Engine wise the car (92 gtst) has a walbro 255, k+n, fmic, cam gears and and turbo back 3"exhaust. Wish list is a Hypergear high flow or ATR43G1, Link G4x and some newer injectors before a tune up. My goals are modest, only low 200's power wise. i know i could achieve this with less, but i've been swapping out old for new where i can. Every cooling hose has been replaced, along with mani gaskets, WP, thermostat and radiator, fuel pump and timing belt, tensioner and idler, and i rebuilt the steering rack. Regarding the injectors, the fruiterers all seem to sell what used to be considered quite large injectors. There are a lot of options for bosch 1000cc EV14's, and i would like to know if that is a suitable choice for my build. Is modern injector design good enough to run these at the low duty cycles that i likely would be? is there a downside to running a too large injector these days? or, would there be an upside to running a smaller injector at higher duty cycle? I can see that there are smaller injectors still available, but the ones i have seen specifically marketed for RB's are pretty large (see: https://golebysparts.au/collections/fuel-rail-injector-kits/products/nissan-rb20-fuel-rail-bosch-980cc-1150cc-injectors-turbosmart-fpr800-regulator-kit), and i dont know enough about them to say one not marketed for RB's would fit or not. I have searched the forums, and amongst all the posts on older tech, I did see gtsboy recommend EV14's, but no size was mentioned... again, i'm not clear on if the smaller size bosch injectors are also EV14's as they do look similar.  also, if someone can recommend a tuner familiar with RB's in the Geelong or West Melbourne area i'd appreciate it. Thanks in advance guys. Cheers, Rowdy  
    • FWIW the depth of the groove in the rubber pad is not super essential, the blocks are rubber and squish a bit. If you are worried an angle grinder will make a deeper groove quick smart
    • I mean, if you were to move the jacking points away from the original location, that is, away from the wheels and closer to the centreline of the car, then it will be more likely to overbalance and tip off the supports. Same as we talked about before. I was talking about moving for-aft. If the sill is bent outward or inward, then the car would obviously look unstraight from the outside. Hopefully that hasn't happened either. Again, you can do comparative measurements from the chassis rails to see if there is much deflection.
    • Can you elaborate what you mean with your first sentence? I meant move as in the bulge kinda seemed like it got pulled "outward" meaning it got pulled down and to the side with the jacking rail itself, so the load bearing bulge now sits lower than usual and is not level with the sill on the other side of the jack point. Either that or the jacking rail just got pushed in a good bit.
×
×
  • Create New...