Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I have heard a few comments and just want to clear this up. I noticed some Skylines do not come badged at the rear with anything to suggest they're a R33 GTS-T or a GTS25-T. However, I have always assumed that the "25" was just to represent the RB25DET engine this models after 1996 to late 1998 had the new "GT25-T" badge and there aren't any differences between the two, is this correct?

However, on the other hand, a few of my mates suggest that the GTS25-T models came with some extra goodies...can someone please confirm this...many thanks.

SM.

I thought all R33 GTS-Ts had the GTS25t sticker, while the GTS had the GTS25 sticker.

I thought it was just some people removed them coz they like the no sticker/badge look?

My 1993 series 1 R33 GTS-T has a GTS25t sticker, but the "t" peeled off...

I thought all R33 GTS-Ts had the GTS25t sticker, while the GTS had the GTS25 sticker.

I thought it was just some people removed them coz they like the no sticker/badge look?

My 1993 series 1 R33 GTS-T has a GTS25t sticker, but the "t" peeled off...

Yep one and the same, when the guys on here refer to an r33 gts-t it's easier to type gts-t rather than gts25-t

there's no actual 'special' gts25-t model, maybe the 40th anniversary models but pretty sure they still came off the showroom floor with the gts25t sticker

AWD versions have gts-4 stickers from factory, doesn't mean the car is a 4 cylinder or 4 litre

Then again you should all get r34's so you only have to type GT-t hahaha

correct my 40th anni has a gts25t sticker on the rear. GTS-T is just a shorterned way of saying ur GTS is turbo charged. a lot of people don't even bother with the T on the end. non turbo R33s arent so popular in the heavy tuning motorsports world and most tuners name the GTS25T as just a GTS. as opposed to being a GTR.

correct my 40th anni has a gts25t sticker on the rear. GTS-T is just a shorterned way of saying ur GTS is turbo charged. a lot of people don't even bother with the T on the end. non turbo R33s arent so popular in the heavy tuning motorsports world and most tuners name the GTS25T as just a GTS. as opposed to being a GTR.

Hey all, thanks for your replies... this answers it nicely!

So there aren't any differences after all - what do you know.

So does the 40th anniversary edition one have anything that's different?

Cheers.

to answer your question about the 40th anniversary please run a search plenty has been listed.

all the standard 40th anniversary features have been modified on my car though nothing on my car says its a 40th anniversary anymore :P

So does the 40th anniversary edition one have anything that's different?

It has oval "40th Anniversary" badges on the C pillars, similar fabric decals sewn into the front seats and a smug sense of self-satisfaction when driving that you own a "special" model :P

ahhh some cars come badged from Nissan with a GTS-T sticker on the back.. some come with a GST25T.. So saying that tuners don't look at it isnt the question.. i also wondered about this but never looked into it..

It has oval "40th Anniversary" badges on the C pillars, similar fabric decals sewn into the front seats and a smug sense of self-satisfaction when driving that you own a "special" model :/

More factory options

R34 crank angle sensor

The cams also differ slightly and need to be 98 model specific when replacing/upgrading

  • 5 years later...

More factory options

R34 crank angle sensor

The cams also differ slightly and need to be 98 model specific when replacing/upgrading

well done i have a pristine purple 40th love it done lots and lots of research crank sensor is different its an r34 sensor

the motor in the 40th is called the cross over its a blent of 33 and 34 and as you are aware the option list for the 40th

is nearly twice as long as the standard gts25t great drivers car

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Structured text and other high level PLC programing languages are not allowable in Functional Safety. They are very difficult to audit. My PLC stuff is almost exclusively oriented towards Burner Management Systems which are a particularly pernicious form of Safety Instrumented System, when implemented in an SPLC. Even the part of the code written to work in the non-safety logic part of the PLC, like with a Siemens S7-1500 series, still needs to be treated as if it was safety code, with access restrictions, code fingreprints and the like. And Allen Bradley can go EABODs. They ae full of shit. They have this whole lie going on where they say if you use a ControlLogix controller and its IO, and then just duplicate the IOs (ie, run in series or parallel depending on type, to try to make it "fail safe") and "use these programming styles and place these restrictions on what you do" that you can achieve SIL2. What a load of crap. They just get away with it because no-one in the US seems to understand the first thing about Functional Safety and carries on as if all they have to do is buy only SIL2 rated equipment and hey presto, it's a SIL2 system. Idiots. /rant
    • If you're really considering leaving it, a great question to ask is, is the magnet going to stick to the sump? The answer to the above is the same answer towards if I'd have any level of comfort leaving it... Personally, based on the cost of a motor if the magnet were to cause damage, I'd be fishing it out either way. Use the methods in here. It fit in through the plug hole, it'll come out.   PS, get a small actuatable claw for a bore scope. OR if you know a vet, they have really cool controllable scopes with hooks on the end. Supposedly they're like playing a video game. Ask if they can acquire you one of their scopes... Engine oil after all is just a different type of lube right? Will only make it easier on the next dog or cat...
    • All other (Boolean) logic functions though, are just built on those blocks above. Which does give you a lot of functionality in logic. It is basing that on using thresholds with analogue signals like GTS alluded to.   Not having things like timers will make it less useful for some of the ramp up logic you'd want, and again, on Haltecs capacity specifically, I'm not across anymore what you can / can't do with different tables.   I'm assuming, with your logic you want to implement, not only do you want your timing safeties, you're wanting to be able to derive the duty cycle for your solenoid, to maintain I'm assuming 175PSi? Or are you using a standalone WMI controller to maintain the DC correct, and you just want the Haltech working out which fuelling maps you should be on?
    • It doesn't seem to follow revs. Oddly it seems to follow TPS a little bit from what I can see, but with some delay a bit. IE end of the graph, when he lets off throttle fully, pressure drops a lot, then slowly builds back up, but rpm is on a nice cruisey drop off. I do agree though, it seems very electrically.
    • I just try to entirely stay away from ladder now unless it's something basic maintained by electricians. Even then and to your point, it mostly ends up being blocks I wrote in structured text.  PLC's are slowly going towards C, C++ and C#. I just wish Allen-Bradley would jump on the bandwagon. 
×
×
  • Create New...