Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You dont download the latest top gear eps do you?

They tested it on there last show, some points i remember, it was extremely fast but handled like a bucket of water due to the eco friendly low resistance tyres and the extra 500kg worth of batteries it has to carry, both of the cars they had for testing either broke down or ran out of charge well before they should have, it costs 90,000 pounds, $220,000AU and it takes 16 hours to fully charge from empty.

While atm it has problems and is not feesable cars like this do pave the way for more practical, affordable and viable models in the future.

Edited by W0rp3D
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249541-electric-cars/#findComment-4327426
Share on other sites

sales pitches always do, give it 5-10yrs and they will have sorted most of the problems and it may be worth it, the battery technology out of this may well be taken on by other electric car manufacturers as that is the biggest problem with electric cars.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249541-electric-cars/#findComment-4327457
Share on other sites

How many batteries again, 6000

Imagine this technology with hondas new hydrogen fuel cell; would work a treat! Anyone else shocked in awe over the new liquid hydrogen fuel cell? basically id expect in 10years to completely replace a-b transport whilst allowing ferrari, lamborghini and even us gtr drivers to keep be polically correct (not just theoretically) and enjoy a spirited petrol burn.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249541-electric-cars/#findComment-4327786
Share on other sites

hydrogen is great in theory, but i just dont like the idea of driving an atom bomb. theres alot of safety stuff around saying there fine, but thats on the idea that you dont rupture the tank, they are 'safe' because there designed around the tank so you dont hurt it, but if you should somehow manage too, FKN BANG! thats my understanding of it....

i like the idea of leccy cars, but give it a few years. biggest problem with them is batteries. they're big, heavy, and expensive atm, but getting better

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249541-electric-cars/#findComment-4327818
Share on other sites

One of my favourite subjects, watch who killed the electric car and the short documentary in the extras.

It will explain the Californian zero emission policy..each manufacturer who wanted to sell cars in California had to have atleast 1 zero emissions vehicle in their range ect...It will also show how Texaco bought and buried battery technology to protected itself.

They did the same thing with trams (cable cars) over there, so the could sell more oil.

All GM EV1's were recalled and crushed.... So yeah they work, yes they can be mass produced economically and they also ripped the corvette of it's day a new one over the 1/4.

Backyard job drag

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_Killed_the_Electric_Car%3F

http://www.evchargernews.com/CD-A/gm_ev1_w.../specs_main.htm specs, pricing ect

  Quote
Limited range (60-70 miles) and reliability in the first EV-1s to ship, but better (110 - 160 miles) later. Research says the average driving distance of Americans in a day is 30 miles or less and that 90% of Americans could use electric cars in their daily commute. Towards the end of the film, an engineer explains that, as of the interview, lithium ion batteries, the same technology available in laptops, would have allowed the EV-1 to be upgraded to a range of 300 miles per charge.
Edited by madbung
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249541-electric-cars/#findComment-4328340
Share on other sites

  VB- said:
hydrogen is great in theory, but i just dont like the idea of driving an atom bomb. theres alot of safety stuff around saying there fine, but thats on the idea that you dont rupture the tank, they are 'safe' because there designed around the tank so you dont hurt it, but if you should somehow manage too, FKN BANG! thats my understanding of it....

There's some interesting and very intensive research going into non pressurised methods of storing hydrogen right now, by dissolving it into another material. holds good promise.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249541-electric-cars/#findComment-4328668
Share on other sites

  VB- said:
sounds interesting, havent heard much about it. if non pressurized then it i'd be more approving of it, if anyone cares lol

The basic idea is that, (chemistry stuff inbound), when something dissolves in a solvent (eg, salt in water), the salt gets ripped into pieces and put in between the water molecules, but because of the way it does it, the water molecules that are carrying the salt don't actually take up any more volume.

Using this principal, you can get a substance, get the hydrogen to dissolve into it without any volume change, and just withdraw hydrogen as needed. I'm not exactly sure how far they've come in the "no pressure" line of things, or if its been more focused (or only useful) in increasing the energy density at high pressures.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249541-electric-cars/#findComment-4329886
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
  sneakey pete said:
The basic idea is that, (chemistry stuff inbound), when something dissolves in a solvent (eg, salt in water), the salt gets ripped into pieces and put in between the water molecules, but because of the way it does it, the water molecules that are carrying the salt don't actually take up any more volume.

Using this principal, you can get a substance, get the hydrogen to dissolve into it without any volume change, and just withdraw hydrogen as needed. I'm not exactly sure how far they've come in the "no pressure" line of things, or if its been more focused (or only useful) in increasing the energy density at high pressures.

wow the depth of those sentences made my head hurt, but I kinda get it.....

lol

THANKS for all the opinions so far guys.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/249541-electric-cars/#findComment-4380418
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Convert to dual filament bulb   FWIW, it will look odd - I dare say a bit dumb as it looks like your flasher relay has shit the bed.
    • If the RB20 box in the car is a push clutch, then yes, you will need to deal with the pull clutch on the turbo box. You either buy a pull clutch and don't use the old one, or you do the things needed to convert the turbo box's clutch arrangement over to push. Which is a bit of a f**karound. "Making" a custom tailshaft is the easy part. But you will need to source the front clip yoke - the bit that goes into the output of the gearbox. These are not as easy to find. They are out there, but they don't grow on trees the way that they used to.
    • Indicator bulbs are way too bright to use as a "corner marker" (we call them parking lights too). Sure. Go ahead and do it. But realise that you wil need to come up with all your own wiring to do it, as no-one will have a standard howto worked out for Skylines. It's just a matter of abandoning everything that Nissan have done and starting from scratch. You'd probably be better off retrofitting tailght/brakelight globe bases into the front indicator housings and using the taillight circuit for your corner marker and the brake light as the indicator. You'd need to work out how to kill the marker circuit while the indicator is flashing, otherwise it won't flash on-off, just bright-less bright.
    • Hi. A little bit of an update. It maybe(hope not) looks like i would need a new tranny(it would be "maybe" a cheaper or better option anyway) So i need some info. I know i need a different propshaft(i can make custom one) LSD is not a problem cuz the engine will be still(for now) N/A RB20. So if i buy RB25DET NEO tranny...is there something else i need? I read something about push/pull type but i do not know if i need to "change" something or i can just plug n play onto my engine a go? Thanks for the advice  
    • Good morning all, Bit of a random question but figured I’d finally throw it out after wondering for a long while. Before I start, I'm hoping to do this purely out of personal preference. I think it would look better at night, and don't mind at all spending a few hours and dollars to get it done. I've copied this from a non-Skyline specific forum, so I apologize for the explanation of our headlight switch setup that we all know. Here we go: Zero lights (switch off) Parking lights (switch position 1) being a rectangular marker on the outside of the housing, my low beam being the projector in the centre (position 2), and a high beam triggered by my turn signal stalk. Most North American cars I’ve owned of this era have power to the amber corner (turning indicator) light as part of the first switch (parking lights). I’d love to have these amber corners receive power when the headlights and parking lights are on (headlight switch), yet still blink when using the turn signal which is of course a separate switch. Hopefully I’ve explained my question correctly. Is anyone aware of a way in which I might be able to achieve this? Thanks in advance
×
×
  • Create New...