Jump to content
SAU Community

Deceleration Shudder While Still On Boost

M E S O G L E A

By M E S O G L E A,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

M E S O G L E A Enthusiast

M E S O G L E A

Posted
Posted (edited)

If I'm driving while boosting and decide to reduce throttle slightly (while staying on boost), the car will shudder or chatter. To avoid this, I must fully release throttle then reapply at a lower level.

My reasoning for this issue:

I have a HKS SSQV, HKS 2530 Kai and Nismo super copper mix single. Any reduction of the throttle while boosting increases vacuum causing the post-compressor intake charge to be vented to the atmosphere. The unsprung friction plate transfers all of that angry compression braking to the drive train causing the car to shudder the same way the SSQV sounds, like a the sphincter of the universe gobble. I know you all dont like the SSQV because its all ricer but the wife loves it and its the thing to do here in Japan.

Anyone else heard of this before?

Edited by M E S O G L E A
M E S O G L E A Enthusiast

M E S O G L E A

Posted
  • Author
Posted

What causes this, the dual stage valve system in the SSQV?

If I reinstall an OEM GTST/GTR BOV, what about the bleed hole on the flange? I was thinking of trying the Dodge BOV mod but it seems like it will act the same as an SSQV.

Anyone else have similar issues using the SSQV?

M E S O G L E A Enthusiast

M E S O G L E A

Posted
  • Author
Posted

So I leave the bleed hole an let boost escape? I am running a PFC that is tuned for the atmo SSQV.

I have a friend that has an SSQV and his doesnt act like mine and does not have the solid clutch plate.

Why does everyone hate the SSQV and other aftermarket BOV's?

M E S O G L E A Enthusiast

M E S O G L E A

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Well, I installed the OEM BOV and it idles like crap.

I tried the Dodge mod and still idles like crap.

I cover the outlet with my hand and it idles fine

I put the SSQV on and it idles fine.

What makes you so sure its the SSQV and not the solid clutch?

M E S O G L E A Enthusiast

M E S O G L E A

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Well thanks.

I try the OEM one at a later date, need to order the GTR BOV and some suspension bolts today.

If it's tuned for atmo and revert to recirc, will it need to be tuned again?

M E S O G L E A Enthusiast

M E S O G L E A

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I apologize for being stubborn.

I installed a new OEM GTR BOV today. The car no longer shudders like the gobbling SSQV. It does, however, cut-out "softly" if I release the throttle partially on boost and the idle is not perfectly happy. I attribute this to a small recirc leak because I used some ill fitting plumbing coupler until I get the proper hose.

Have you any idea how ridiculously hard it is to find automotive hose in Japan? Auto part stores might have a small section for performance with no universal hoses and an isle or 3 dedicated to air freshers, mirrors and useless Hello Kitty accessories.

gotRICE? Veteran

gotRICE?

Posted
Posted

Im sure next time you will take the gurus advice before you fire at them then :)

These guys know what they are on about, so when you ask a question, you get a reply, 9.9 times out of 10 it will be correct.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kinkstaah
      Are you an oil nerd?

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • GTSBoy
      Are you an oil nerd?

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • dbm7
      BCNR33 Blower Motor Resistor - Testing

      By dbm7 · Posted

      Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Murray_Calavera
      Steps to DIY sanding car back ready for respray....

      By Murray_Calavera · Posted

      Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...