Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Manage to swap my 4 month old 1/2 dying WD green drive for a new one at MSY.

Whole process went much smoother than I originally thought, after all the "MSY refund horror stories" I kept on hearing, got me all prepared for the possibility of a lengthy argument for nothing.

Just walked in with the drive, told them the problem & they just offered to replace it on the spot without even bother to test it or anything.

Now I just need to buy some external drives to back up my 1.5 TB anime collection.

  • 3 weeks later...

i have found that the windforce cards aren't much chop for SLI, was awesome when I had 1x GTX 460 though.

Might go MSI for the 670, only because they always seem to clock a bit harder than the Gigabyte for much the same price, but time will tell.

  • 1 month later...

CORRECT!

Start from a fresh install, clean it up, install all the apps you want and configure it all - Then image that. I always remove a bucket load of stuff from Windows that I don't want, different for other users perhaps.

Then it'll always be clean every time you ship it over (do it once every 6 months, you'd be surprised how much improvement it can make).

I guess i was more interested if that was a good price and quality SDD and big enough size?

sorry - could have worded it better.

But yes, idea was to copy data off that I want to keep - download all of the apps I need to a external drive, reinstall errytinks then use all of the 1tb OS drive for storage.

Jas I thought it was ok and bought 1 as well Intel have a very good reputation for fast SSD and for that they put a premium on their drives

I will be coming from a 64gb patriot pyro as my is drive I'm sure I paid about $125 for it

But due to the install size of windows 7 64bit and few other programs I couldn't keep bf3 on it, this will cure what ails me ;)

I've higlighted sustained in the intel stats, the Kingston says 535 but that is proberly burst either was both would be good upgrade options over a platter HDD

Intel

Technical Specifications (330 Series):

  • Model Name: Intel® Solid-State Drive 330 Series
  • Capacity: 120GB
  • NAND Flash Memory 25nm Intel NAND Flash Memory Multi-Level Cell (MLC)
  • Sustained Sequential Reads up to: 500 MB/s
  • Sustained Sequential Writes up to: 450 MB/s
  • Random I/O Operations per
  • Second (4KB IOPS)
  • Reads up to: 22,500 IOPS
  • Writes up to: 33,000 IOPS
  • Interface SATA 6Gb/s, compatible with SATA 3Gb/s
  • Form Factor, Height and Weight
  • Form Factor Height / Weight
  • 2.5 inch 9.5mm / up to 80 grams
  • Life Expectancy: 1.2 million hours Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF)
  • Power Consumption Active: 850 mW Typical
  • Power Consumption Idle: 600 mW Typical
  • Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C

Kingston

Product Specifications

Form factor: 2.5"

Interface: SATA Rev 3.0 (6Gb/s) , SATA Rev 2.0 (3Gb/s)

Sequential reads

SATA Rev. 3.0: 535MB/s

SATA Rev. 2.0: 280MB/s

Sustained Random 4k Read/Write

60GB: 12,000/47,000 IOPS

90GB: 20,000/47,000 IOPS

120GB: 20,000/44,000 IOPS

240GB: 36,000/43,000 IOPS

480GB: 43,000/30,000 IOPS

Max Random 4k Read/Write

60GB: 85,000/60,000 IOPS

90GB: 85,000/57,000 IOPS

120GB: 85,000/55,000 IOPS

240GB: 85,000/43,000 IOPS

480GB: 75,000/34,000 IOPS

Power Consumption:
0.565 W (TYP) Idle / 1.795 W (TYP) Read / 3.230 W (TYP) Write

Storage Temperature:
-40degree ~ 85degree

Operating Temperature:
0degree~70degree

Dimensions:
69.85 x 100 x 9.5mm

Weight:
115 grams

Vibration Operating:
2.17G

Vibration Non-Operating:
20G

MTBF:
1,000,000 Hrs

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...