Jump to content
SAU Community

2009 F1 Season


dezz
 Share

Recommended Posts

... because of the layout of the Ferrari rear suspension and gearbox, Technical Director Aldo Costa is believed to be targeting only June's The land of goat sphincter rings Grand Prix for the debut of a double-diffuser for the F60.

Red Bull is apparently in a similar situation, while McLaren Mercedes, BMW Sauber and Renault may be able to debut new diffusers at the start of the forthcoming European season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Ferrari have been in crisis talks and have setup a task force with Australia's own Chris Dyer in charge for the Chinese GP whilst Costa and Baldisserri stay in Maranello. No mention of what Domenicali will be doing.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It'll get banned and the teams that gave 'em will have the points from the first two races stripped :blush:

hahahahahahahaha

Ferrari have been in crisis talks and have setup a task force with Australia's own Chris Dyer in charge for the Chinese GP whilst Costa and Baldisserri stay in Maranello. No mention of what Domenicali will be doing.....

piss poor effort by the red team. and the silver one too.. but much as I'd love to see Kimi pull his finger out and f**ken drive for once, it's great seeing all the young talent (aside from jenson and rubens heh) up the front of the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See Piquet has finally started to cry about the team favouring Alonso. LOL, he cant use that excuse, it makes him look even more pathetic then his driving. Fair enough about the car not suiting him, or the team favouring Alonso, but there is no excuse for beign nowhere most weekends and throwing the car away every second race.

He is simply not up to the task of racing an F1 car! :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember Piquet struggled to be much further than mid-field in the A1 GP days when he was playing in there so I really could never see him doing well unless he had a perfect car to make him look good.

Speaking of A1 - anyone watch the Portugese round on the weekend? How awesome was that track and how awesome would it be to see F1's around there! I reckon it'd be tops F1 track. Can't beleive I'd never heard of the place before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember Piquet struggled to be much further than mid-field in the A1 GP days when he was playing in there so I really could never see him doing well unless he had a perfect car to make him look good.

Speaking of A1 - anyone watch the Portugese round on the weekend? How awesome was that track and how awesome would it be to see F1's around there! I reckon it'd be tops F1 track. Can't beleive I'd never heard of the place before.

IMHO A1 GP is not a good yardstick. It is heavily dependent on which (usually English) company is running the cars for the various countries. You will find that the successful countries are mostly run by a select few companies. NPKJR was a race winner in A1GP in 05 however.

In any case he ran second in the 06 GP2 championship - some hack called Lewis beat him.

Look, clearly he is struggling & the book of excuses is nearing its end. He can drive & needs to do better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeh the Portugese track is awesome. Its new, i was watching a show on it and the changes in elevation would make it very itneresting in an F1 car with no TC.

...waiting on the FIA :(

Speaking of Portugal & the FIA:

If you want awesome type Latvala Portugal crash video into a search engine.

Jari-Matti destroying his WRC Focus in the most comprehensive possible way. There is some in car & some footage from a random spectator.

Also the FIA want to introduce KERS to rally cars. Why don't they just fk off & let someone competent come up with some decent regulations that may actually promote the category???

Edited by djr81
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There goes Mark's season :down:

The RBR will be about the worst situated team of the guys that are currently competitive. They cant quite match the diffuser teams but they are the closest. They have a car that is difficult to adapt. The Macs and Fez, along with Renault and BMW will all jump them by mid season.

FARK!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There goes Mark's season :down:

You mean Sebastian's season. Mark has by some fluke of dumb luck managed to keep his car running - he almost finished his first race at the first corner remember. Unluckiest guy in F1 he even breaks his leg when he's in the offseason, anyone that accident prone should have a desk job!! Sure root for the aussie and all it's amazing we got one into the top league of motorsport but I just don't get what's likeable about him, certainly not that stupid thing he does with his forehead whenever there's a camera on him (or maybe he is like that all the time). He always has a bad word to say about someone else when things don't go his way, harden the f**k up Webber!

*zips up flame suit*

I hope RBR manage to keep up with the rest of the pack, it's great to see Vettel in the mix. He will show up Webber this season guaranteed, he is a very impressive driver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Kinks, i disagree. I think this year will be Webbers best year yet. Vettel alongside him pushing him will drive him. Many drivers if they get beat will reach for the excuse book. I think Webber will improve it needed.

So far two GPs down and they are looking equal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vettel will strugle to make an impression On Weber if there are many more wet races.

Hey Kinks, i disagree. I think this year will be Webbers best year yet. Vettel alongside him pushing him will drive him. Many drivers if they get beat will reach for the excuse book. I think Webber will improve it needed.

So far two GPs down and they are looking equal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think when its wet Webber is strong, but i think his real strength is in changeable conditions where others are trying to feel out grip levels. The transient parts of the races are when he is typically strong (thinking back to the races that started wet vs changed mid race)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't agree, remember Vettel won in Italy in a part wet race.

Not surprised by ruling either, now it's just a matter of how fast others play catch up......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vettel couldn't get the same times as Webber in the last race....

now they are in the same car it is a more fair comparison than last year when the TR looked very stronger towards the end of the season than the RB cars.

we will need to see more races to know who is quicker as they seem to carry very similar pace.

Edited by wolverine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't agree, remember Vettel won in Italy in a part wet race.

Not surprised by ruling either, now it's just a matter of how fast others play catch up......

AND the McLaren was good in the wet last year and Vettel took him twice in Brazil last year. Both drivers are strong in the wet, but like Vettel most of Webbers results have been in the wet. If nto results his speed. How about Webbers performance in British GP last year, he lost it in the first lap, but he was the quickest car for the first two stints rolling past cars every 2-3 laps. It was impressive driving and shows what may have been if he didnt loop it on the first lap. Fogged helmet or not it was a mistake on his part. The BIG thing with Webber is he cant get off the line to save his life. Every 3rd GP he holds his position, most he loses off the grid and once every season he may grab a position :ninja:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Right.  I'll try my best at a concise "bring you up to speed" on stuff that may be missing here - obviously open to questions or further input from others as relevant. Here's a datalog from a responsive turbo setup with electronic boost control being used a bit, to keep it simple I've marked 3 points of interest.  All of these charts are on the same time scale on the X-axis, so you can reference what engine rpm is doing in the top graph, boost and EMAP (exhaust backpressure) in the second graph, and turbo rpm in the bottom graph. A) The turbo gets it's power from exhaust gas, and pumping air takes work.  As a result you can't just spin a turbo with a fixed amount of exhaust energy and expect it to keep spooling - the bigger the turbo (ie, the more air it can push) the more exhaust energy you need to drive it.   The most obvious ways of getting more exhaust energy are by adding displacement, adding boost, or adding rpm - but as you add any of these the turbo also needs to do a bit more work so there is a big balance of these things needed to even get to your target boost and sometimes that's not even possible. What you can see in step "A" is that there isn't enough engine rpm or boost to reach the level we want, so this is where "lag" is.  The dyno run continues and rpm increases, which gives enough energy to increase boost, which helps spool  the turbine speed up even more - so you can see that the rate that the boost (and turbo speed) are starting to ramp up faster than the engine rpm is, so turbo is really starting to wake up as the graph gets closer to point B....   B) At this point we've been able to reach the boost that is actually desired at this point.   To stop the boost from going further than this the wastegate will open and bypass gas past the turbine, meaning it doesn't continue accelerating at the point it was before but instead carry on at a more progressive rate which matches what the engine needs.   The wastegate will have a spring in it which is rated to a specific pressure where it will start bypassing, but electronic boost control (managed by the ECU) can adjust how much pressure the spring sees in order to allow some tunability on how much boost the wastegate actually sees, and therefore how much exhaust it bypasses.   The tune in this case stops boost from ramping up HARD at around 21-22psi just before 4000rpm, then as the rpm continue it allows boost to continue up to around 25psi higher in the rpm.   You can see the turbo speed fairly steadily increases through the rpm to ensure it's keeping up with the increasing airflow demand due to the engine speed being higher and boost being pretty steady.   If the boost dropped off after a point then you may see the turbo speed level off or even drop.   C) You can see that despite the boost pressure staying pretty flat here, the exhaust pressure is steadily increasing and at this stage has overtaken boost pressure.   This isn't unusual, and is largely as a result of the increasing energy needed by the turbo to pump more and more air to suit the needs of the engine as it revs out further.   There are a bunch of variables in regards to how much back pressure there will be on a given turbo etc, but its one of the factors we manage when sizing and tuning a turbo setup.   When exhaust back pressure starts exceeding boost pressure you will eventually start seeing signs that the turbo is running out, the engine gets less keen to make more power and it gets harder to raise boost further. In this case it's a fairly acceptable compromise for the power level (around 630kw on a 3litre engine with full boost by 4000rpm), but you'd not want to push it a lot harder than this.  The maximum speed rated for the compressor wheel on this setup is around 125,000rpm so you can see its starting to get close on that side as well - I feel like this kind of illustrates some of the turbo related things we both decide on how far to push, and are also limited to how far we can push depending on the parts combination. Hope this helps more than it confuses things  
    • For that influx of Spammers we had I made no pic posting and no PM's for first ten posts. This is group based and I've manually updated @Beanie to the Members group which will open up the images and PM's. 
    • Thx for the reassuring reply. I’ve got above legal clearance  going in for roadworthy Friday… fingers crossed it’s keeping me awake  bloody nanny state 
    • I was actually going to try and dig out a datalog with turbine speed and EMAP haha
    • Wait until @Lithium posts a compressor map and tries to explain what's going on. There is a strong possibility that the OP lives in a digital world and is not comfortable with analogue machines. A turbo is just about as analogue as it gets, with plenty of non-linear behaviours added in on top. Most of us who think we know how they work are actually only getting by on 2nd and 3rd order mental models that abstract away from the actual physics and bring it back to the sort of kindergarten level concepts we can hold in our heads. This is important when you need to hold 10 such concepts in your head at the same time. You need to reduce the complexity of the individual concepts to allow them to be simultaneously held and manipulated. Too much complexity in the base models makes it very difficult to make them work with each other mentally.
×
×
  • Create New...