Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

LOL, part hunch and part wishful thinking...both RBRs to be in the top 4. I am betting that they have speed to burn and have been running heavy all weekend so as not to show their pace. I suspect they dont want the likes of Ferrari, Brawn etc thinking that RBR have a speed advantage and throwing low fuel in the car to mess with the RBR race strategy.

So when they sprin up in Q2 and Q3 the other teams have less time to do anything about ther pace regarding fuel loads.

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

certainly brawn have been foxing. if you read the driver quotes from practice 1 & 2 you'd think they were struggling.

big fuel loads and race setup (which is what RBR seemed to be doing) should see them in good stead.

i think Ferrari are a genuine chance of a podium this weekend.

The softer compound tyres are going to be tricky to manage. The performance dropped off on the end of the 2nd sector and into the 3rd sector.

If the Brawns are easy on the tyres as we have seen previously they are a good chance during that phase. Vettel seemed to be quite hard on the tyres last race so he will have his work cut out but he is very very quick.

Top job by Vettel with Button, Barrichello, Webber and Trulli in the first 5 places.

Well as a Webber fan i am again lamenting Webber getting done in quali and left hoping he has more fuel. I was watching on live timing and couldnt tell if Vettel was on softs and what tyres the others are on?

With Trulle and the Fezz behind him Webber better make a cracker of a start, he on the dirty side so will have to watch for Trulli otherise a podium shot could be gone by turn 1.

...and lol Hamo out qualified by Heiki again :)

Pretty sure everyone except Barrichello on softs.

Webber's 2nd sector was pretty slow so i am guessing he understeered somewhere here, maybe he was carrying a higher fuel load than Vettel but Webber was the shizzle in sector 1 so it's more likely that a small mistake cost him 2 tenths.

Edited by wolverine
Webber heavier then thoe ahead of him, if only a tad in front of Button. I hope he an jump at least one of the Brawns! May have to cancel my dinner with local crumpet so i can sink beers watching the race :)

lol !

:D

1. Sebastian Vettel, Red Bull, 649.5

2. Jenson Button, Brawn GP, 655.5

3. Rubens Barrichello, Brawn GP, 652.5

4. Mark Webber, Red Bull, 656

5. Jarno Trulli, Toyota, 652

6. Kimi Raikkonen, Ferrari, 658

7. Felipe Massa, Ferrari, 654

8. Fernando Alonso, Renault, 644.5

9. Nico Rosberg, Williams, 660

10. Robert Kubica, BMW Sauber, 664

11. Nick Heidfeld, BMW Sauber, 681.5

12. Kazuki Nakajima, Williams, 680.4

13. Timo Glock, Toyota, 689

14. Heikki Kovalainen, McLaren, 665

15. Adrian Sutil, Force India, 668.5

16. Lewis Hamilton, McLaren, 696.5

17. Nelson Piquet, Renault, 689.6

18. Sebastien Buemi, Toro Rosso, 686.5

19. Giancarlo Fisichella, Force India, 688.5

20. Sebastien Bourdais, Toro Rosso, 701

Does anyone know if these weights include the drivers? Because Webber always seems to be that 6-7kgs heavier than Vettel but rarely does he run all that much longer in the 1st stint so I'm curious if the weight difference we always see is to do with Mark himself rather than just the fuel difference?

Good work Mark with another P2....

Not much else for me to say about the race unfortunately (for me being Ferrari..)

Also great to see there's still plenty of coverage of not only Hamilton lapping with the back markers, but also of his dad fondling himself in the garage...I'd be lost without such coverage.

the sphincter of the universe was one of the more interesting races ive seen for a while, Its kinda sad to say, but it was good watching some of the bigger teams struggle with setup.

Interesting?

It was possibly the most boring GP i've ever watched! :thumbsup:

Yeah well that was a pretty boring race really..... Would have been MUCH more interesting if Button had of spun around into a wall or something lol.

Good result for Webber, and that's 5 out of 7 races he has beaten Vettel now :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, pretty much what you said is a good summary. The aftermarket thing just attached to the rim, then has two lines out to valve stems, one to inner wheel, one to outer wheel. Some of the systems even start to air up as you head towards highway speed. IE, you're in the logging tracks, then as speeds increase it knows you're on tarmac and airs up so the driver doesn't even have to remember. I bet the ones that need driver intervention to air up end up seeing a lot more tyre wear from "forest pressures" in use on the highway!
    • Yes, but you need to do these type certifications for tuning parts. That is the absurd part here. Meaning tuning parts are very costly (generally speaking) as well as the technical test documentation for say a turbo swap with more power. It just makes modifying everything crazy expensive and complicated. That bracket has been lost in translation many years ago I assume, it was not there.
    • Hahaha, yeah.... not what you'd call a tamper-proof design.... but yes, with the truck setup, the lines are always connected, but typically they sit just inside the plane of the rear metal mudguards, so if you clear the guards you clear the lines as well. Not rogue 4WD tracks with tree branches and bushes everywhere, ready to hook-up an air hose. You can do it externally like a mod, but dedicated setups air-pressurize the undriven hubs, and on driven axles you can do the same thing, or pressurize the axles (lots of designs out there for this idea)... https://www.trtaustralia.com.au/traction-air-cti-system/  for example.... ..the trouble I've got here... wrt the bimmer ad... is the last bit...they don't want to show it spinning, do they.... give all the illusion that things are moving...but no...and what the hell tyre profile is that?...25??? ...far kernel, rims would be dead inside 10klms on most roads around here.... 😃
    • You're just describing how type certification works. Personally I would be shocked to discover that catalytic converter is not in the stock mounting position. Is there a bracket on the transfer case holding the catalytic converter and front pipe together? If so, it should be in stock position. 
    • You talking about the ones in the photo above? I guess that could make sense. Fixed (but flexible) line from the point up above down to the hubcap thingo, with a rotating air seal thingo. Then fixed (but also still likely flexible) line from the "other side" of the transfer in the hub cap thingo up to the valve stem on the rim. A horrible cludge, but something that could be done. I'd bet on the Unimog version being fed through from the back, as part of the axle assembly, without the need for the vulnerable lines out to the sides. It's amazing what you can do when you have an idea that is not quite impossible. Nearly impossible, but not quite.
×
×
  • Create New...