Jump to content
SAU Community

2009 F1 Season


dezz
 Share

Recommended Posts

That's what my problem with it was, he made contact with Rubens

actually, rubens made contact with webber...

webber was infront and did not have any steering lock at the time of impact, rubens failed to take action to avoid running into webber from a rear angle

rubens only took sudden action at the time of impact, which actually made the incident look worse than it was

Edited by Cerbera
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Remember boys rubbing is racing, do you think they should just give in because the other car is near them.

Thats why they get paid millions to drive these cars, its a dangerous job, the teams spend hundreds of millions of dollars

developing these cars for hundreds of a secound off a lap time, but if the driver just gives in and lets another car pass

them, all that money spent was in vain.Driving a F1 car is hard the better and toughter a driver car be the faster he is on race day.As they say, last lap betterstick it up the inside into that corner and win or walk back holding your helmet from the the san trap or wall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

actually, rubens made contact with webber...

webber was infront and did not have any steering lock at the time of impact, rubens failed to take action to avoid running into webber from a rear angle

rubens only took sudden action at the time of impact, which actually made the incident look worse than it was

Maybe you need to go back over my other posts in regards to the incident....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

accidently running into the back of someone, however hamfisted that accident actually was, is a totally different scenario than swerving into car that is already alongside you on a straight. You're allowed to block once - you aren't allowed to ram someone overtaking you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looked like Hamilton cooked it though. I don't think he could've stopped safely in time. He'd have needed a handbrake to make the corner at that speed with cold tyres.

It's funny though, for the last three races, Hamilton has been saying that the car's inferior, that he got everything out of it he could, yet in all those races, Heiki kicked his arse. So by Hamiltons logic, he got everything he could out of the car, Heiki beat him in the same car, therefore Heiki is the superior driver?

Not true of course, but it's about time Lewis stopped blaming the car when things are bad, and writing books about how great he is when they are good.

He did qualify and start well though, I'll give him that.

And regarding the drive through: Over-reactions aside, Reubens was in webber's blind spot. His mirrors don't cover someone on your 45, he moved sharply, as many do on the start, that Reubens was there was unlucky for both of them.

Was a penalty legal? Yes. All contact can be penalised. Yet in similiar incidents, or even worse incidents, the FIA has done nothing.

Personally, I'd prefer that the drivers are allowed to race, as long as no one is unfairly hampered by racing contact. Reubens was fine, and moved ahead of Mark, so he was in no way disadvantaged. No shredded carbon fibre, just a bit of a tap, in my opinion. If he had of leaned right into reubens and bumped him onto the dirt, well that's a penalty or a black flag any day of the week.

If they are consistent and penalise that sort of thing every race, then fair cop. Otherwise it's going to become a farce.

Almost makes me hope the breakaway will also break away from FIA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever the controversy over the start incident he still managed to win by over 10 seconds and after 8 years of hard luck in f1 its great to see webber get some reward for his efforts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And regarding the drive through: Over-reactions aside, Reubens was in webber's blind spot. His mirrors don't cover someone on your 45, he moved sharply, as many do on the start, that Reubens was there was unlucky for both of them.

Was a penalty legal? Yes. All contact can be penalised. Yet in similiar incidents, or even worse incidents, the FIA has done nothing.

Personally, I'd prefer that the drivers are allowed to race, as long as no one is unfairly hampered by racing contact. Reubens was fine, and moved ahead of Mark, so he was in no way disadvantaged. No shredded carbon fibre, just a bit of a tap, in my opinion. If he had of leaned right into reubens and bumped him onto the dirt, well that's a penalty or a black flag any day of the week.

If they are consistent and penalise that sort of thing every race, then fair cop. Otherwise it's going to become a farce.

Almost makes me hope the breakaway will also break away from FIA.

Weber ran Massa (IIRC) over the pit line and 2 wheels onto the grass in a previous start this season and got no penalty. He's got a habit of over-agressive "blocking", but blocking is done while you still have the lead - mark still does it when there is an overlap. This is the way he drives. Its not just an one off incident.

Rubens had him already. Weber didn't loose the spot because of the incident, it was as good as lost already. Weber's side pod into Ruben's front wheel - he was already done for. Whether he was disadvantaged or not is irrelevant. you cannot go around swerving into other cars that are alongside you.

Weber said in the post race interview that he didn't get a great start and didn't know where Rubens was. If you don't know where the other cars are, don't go darting around blindly. simple. blindy swerving around is just dangerous. If you don't get a great start, get across straight away as most drivers do before the other cars establish an overlap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well said. Schumacher was the one who started all the swerving off the startline to push others out of the way. It has only got worse since. Hopefully Webber will learn from this & not do it again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever the controversy over the start incident he still managed to win by over 10 seconds and after 8 years of hard luck in f1 its great to see webber get some reward for his efforts

yeah that's the truth. I still personally think the penalty was un-warranted and inconsistent but in the end all it did was reduce his win from an absolute spanking (he would have been near half a lap up) to a decent spanking.

and I do agree that he should play by the rules but honestly who the fk knows what they are? cause one week you'll get done for a certain move, and at the next race someone will pull it on you and get away with it and you'll think. wtf?!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah that's the truth. I still personally think the penalty was un-warranted and inconsistent but in the end all it did was reduce his win from an absolute spanking (he would have been near half a lap up) to a decent spanking.

and I do agree that he should play by the rules but honestly who the fk knows what they are? cause one week you'll get done for a certain move, and at the next race someone will pull it on you and get away with it and you'll think. wtf?!?

The good thing about Webber is he doesn't carry on like a bitching school girl when someone else does it to him. He is an (overly) aggressive driver at times but to give him his due, when someone else does it to him he just gets on with it.

As for the rules - it is F1 - the rules are whatever they make up this week.

Just went to down to the news agent. Usually they have a half a dozen or so copies of Auto Fiction. This week there are atleast two dozen. I reckon someone thinks there may be a Webber induced sales bump. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. Don't get me wrong, there are racing accidents and these are always going to be a part of any motorsports. I (me) don't think you can compare what Mark did by deliberately moving across on RB as in the same category as clashes of wheels and pods when drivers are vying for position.

...........

"deliberately moving across on RB" eh, see thats an assumption on your part so drop the 'I am so objective' act. Your are assuming intent by using the word "deliberately" when you have no way of knowing what MW's intention was. Plus he has given a perfectly reasonable explanation which you obviously do not accept. Which is your right of course but at the same time shows your bias.

Also why would MW intentionally try to hit RB and so consequentially risk damage to his own car? Does not make sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and djr81 is right, webber can drive like a bit of a cnt from time to time. i'll admit it. most guys who make it to the top tend to be just a tad ruthless and a tad loose in their interpretation of driving standards manuals... but he does cop it sweet too. and I would argue he's copped more than he's dished out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

because most of the poofs driving thee days will swerve to avoid and you may put them off enought o retain the position.

at least Rubens showed he isn't going to be pushed around on the track. Not budging is exactly what Senna/Prost/any other hardman racer from the goold old days would have done. That's how you stop this over agressive defending - let the other bloke crash into you. He won't swerve at you again knowing he really is risking his race.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeh good point re Mark. I remember at Monza last year when Hamo ran him off the track at the end of the brakign zone. It was an intentional prick move with Webber easily in sight, in the wet and after Hamo had already changed his line several times...IN A BRAKING ZONE!!!! And, no penalty. When reporters wanted a blow up from Mark, he said "jsut tough racing...no problem with that"

But he did comment a few weeks later that Hamo was getting a reputation for being overly agressive...after this weekend it looks like Hamo still confuses overly aggressive with overly ambitious :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well.... yes and perhaps no. It depends on what you mean by "spool". For most of us, the point that we would describe as where the turbo is "spooling" is the point where the wheel speed gets high enough for it to start making some boost. This is coincidentally around about the point where it starts making noise - hence the "spooling" sound. If that is what you mean, then no - the wastegate should still be shut at this point. The boost will still be way below the point where it should start opening. If, on the other hand, you mean "spool" as "reach full boost", then yes. At the point where the boost has reached target, then boost control has already started. The wastegate is already open, and has been for some time. Some short time, definitely, but still, some time. If you have no boost controller - just the wastegate actuator connected to the boost source, then you have a mechanical system working as a pressure balance. There is pressure on one side of the wastegate actuator's diaphragm from the spring, and pressure on the other side coming from the boost measurement location (the "source"). This is not a digital thing. The wastegate does not stay shut until the boost pressure reaches the spring "pressure". The spring will start to compress as soon as you start to apply any pressure onto it. This can be controlled somewhat by adding pre-load into the spring, but you cannot add enough preload to make it into a digital switch behaviour. The wastegate will crack open and start to leak exhaust out (and therefore not though the turbine) well before you reach the target boost pressure. Electronic (and some mechanical/pneumatic) boost controllers will act to prevent the boost source applying pressure to the actuator until just before you reach target boost, thus preventing the wastegate from creeping open. And some boost controllers will apply boost pressure on the spring side to further push it shut. And this can be be necessary because the exhaust pressure in the manifold also pushes on the wastegate valve and tries to open it and you cab get it leaking even without it being connected to the boost source.
    • A stand alone boost controller will not give you the control you need, unlike a modern ECU. Your boost will always naturally target the wastegate's opening pressure first, your controller then will allow you to add more boost as required.
    • I recently discovered that I could not remove the outer bolt on one of my rear UCAs. Looked like it was seized to the crush tube. It wasn't all that long since I had last had that arm out (I dunno exactly, but certainly <2 yrs), so I was a bit surprised. I thought I had stock bushes in the rear knuckles, so I ordered some new PU bushes and resigned myself to having to do some dismantlery....and some butchery. It was clear that the seized bush was going to need to have the bolt cut out of it and then possibly some more brutality after that. Upon getting the 3x arms on each side disconnected from the knuckles (with the exception of the seized one, of course), I discovered that I had in fact put PU bushes into the knuckles when I did the subframe conversion about 12-13 years ago. So, I say "Oh, good, I might not have to swap any of these others out". We set to work butchering the bolt out of the seized arm. Stainless blade in a big-arse Milwaukee recipro made short work of it, and also damaged the arm, which added a welding and grinding and painting step to the whole exercise. During the butchery it became clear that the bolt was not just seized but bent. Head scratching ensued, as it is hard to understand how that bolt could get bent. I did suffer a broken (stock) toe control arm on that side a few months ago, and drove some miles with some significant rear wheel self steer and lack of control, which probably was the cause. But it's still hard to understand how it would bend that bolt, rather than just bend the arm. But here's the start of the real discoveries. The crush tube was rusty as all shit. I mean seriously rusty. A little on the inside, contributing to the tube seizing to the bolt (along with the bend). But the outside had at least 2-3mm of compressed flaky iron oxide jammed in between the parent metal and the PU bush. This one was brutalised and still took some effort to get the PU off the crush tube. So I thought I'd inspect the others more closely. The one on the tension rod adjacent the bent one was first. I had to use a 2-jaw puller to get the crush tube out, and it took some effort. It came out looking like the first one. All 6 of them were the same, except for one that looked not too bad. Had some corrosion on it, but was mostly OK. There was also a significant amount of corrosion on the inner surfaces of the knuckles. They took some convincing with pointy tools to let go their grip on the inside of the holes they were in. There was no sign of the original (SuperPro) lube anywhere. I and my bro-in-law have never seen any crush tube end up looking like this. It was seriously like the car has spent time putting boats into the water at the boat ramp. So, it seems like the PU might have been bonded to the steel on both sides, which would have to make them work more like stock rubber bushes (where arm deflection results in twist inside the rubber). Despite this, I have never had cause to believe that they were so tightly bound up. The suspension moved up and down much as you'd expect. The car never made any noises in those bushes that would have led me to believe there was a problem. Maybe the rusty interfaces actually were "sliding". Anyway, lesson learnt. Even quiet, non-troublesome PU bushes should be inspected every now and then!
    • the boost controller allows you to adjust the opening of the wastegate (which only has one preset spring) I'm going to see how it acts on it
    • I studied the principle of wastegate to begin with. so if I understood correctly. the moment when the turbo "spool" is where the boost control begins. When the target level of "psi" is reached the wastegate opens to regulate the exhaust pressure passing through the turbo and thus control its speed and the rate of boost
×
×
  • Create New...