Jump to content
SAU Community

2009 F1 Season


dezz
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

dont think they were too keen on letting a noob like senna race a completely unprepared car

at least button and rubens have more ability to drive around the problems they'll face this year

senna will be in next year fo sho

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Get him in there now and get RB out. Let Senna start off with Brawn right from the beginning.

Slow ass Button can develop the car and Senna can score some points and nudge some tyre barriers along the way.

Edited by benm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd f*ck off Button and keep Rubens after last year... Plus Rubens and Brawn had a very good working relationship and many years operating with one another. I think under the current circumstances, that will be invaluable.. Also, Button drove like a droop last year.. Rubens did very well for with a crappy car, outscored and outdrove a much younger teammate.. I thikn that proves Rubens is still fit and has fire in the belly! :banana:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, if i was going to give Senna a seat i woudl bin Jensen. He is paid more, through his many years with Honda has never really been able to click with the team and develop a crew or car around him. Rubens did more on occasion then Jensen though i think Jensen was at the end of the day was consistantly quicker, he just was never there to pick up the pieces and muscle the car up the grid when opportunities presented itself.

So i would take Rubens and the cash saving and sell of Jesen, thing is sponsors dont want to see two Brazilians in a team so...woudl never happen. Plus at the moment i think Senna is more name then capability

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hahaha heiki has been bottom of time charts all through testing, by the way button ended 4th in the monday barcalona testing after leading the whole day, we can't be negative of senna just yet, although I do feel that he is a better driver than some on the grid if it's not going to happen now then possibly within next few years, having seen some of his gp2 I'd say atleast give him a go for force India LOL

Also looks like the mclaren cars aren't doing that great in testing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I thought the problem with doing this is the engine needs more timing and therefore is actually less efficient? Modern engines need very little timing to get to MBT, those super sharp edges on the squish pads are probably not the right way to get there but doing away with it entirely doesn't sound right either.
    • this explains the possibility of several maps with different boost levels
    • ok, I understand much better how we can control the boost and increase the number of psi before opening the wastegate
    • Well.... yes and perhaps no. It depends on what you mean by "spool". For most of us, the point that we would describe as where the turbo is "spooling" is the point where the wheel speed gets high enough for it to start making some boost. This is coincidentally around about the point where it starts making noise - hence the "spooling" sound. If that is what you mean, then no - the wastegate should still be shut at this point. The boost will still be way below the point where it should start opening. If, on the other hand, you mean "spool" as "reach full boost", then yes. At the point where the boost has reached target, then boost control has already started. The wastegate is already open, and has been for some time. Some short time, definitely, but still, some time. If you have no boost controller - just the wastegate actuator connected to the boost source, then you have a mechanical system working as a pressure balance. There is pressure on one side of the wastegate actuator's diaphragm from the spring, and pressure on the other side coming from the boost measurement location (the "source"). This is not a digital thing. The wastegate does not stay shut until the boost pressure reaches the spring "pressure". The spring will start to compress as soon as you start to apply any pressure onto it. This can be controlled somewhat by adding pre-load into the spring, but you cannot add enough preload to make it into a digital switch behaviour. The wastegate will crack open and start to leak exhaust out (and therefore not though the turbine) well before you reach the target boost pressure. Electronic (and some mechanical/pneumatic) boost controllers will act to prevent the boost source applying pressure to the actuator until just before you reach target boost, thus preventing the wastegate from creeping open. And some boost controllers will apply boost pressure on the spring side to further push it shut. And this can be be necessary because the exhaust pressure in the manifold also pushes on the wastegate valve and tries to open it and you cab get it leaking even without it being connected to the boost source.
    • A stand alone boost controller will not give you the control you need, unlike a modern ECU. Your boost will always naturally target the wastegate's opening pressure first, your controller then will allow you to add more boost as required.
×
×
  • Create New...