Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Button said they were discussing the strateegy on the radio, and his frist reaction was it was a risky call. But I would be amazed if these calls are purely down to the team. In fact i will say they are not. You hear it all the time with guys like Alonso telling the team how the car is going, what other drivers are doing in traffic and tyres with times. Its a team thing and the drivers are head of the team on a race day.

Also Dezz, my point about Vettel having a shocker, he is really the only guy at the moment who could count himself a title challenger for Button. Rubens has the same car but wotn challenge Button, if RBR find a tad more pace with the diffuser it will be on for Vettel and the WDC. So the guy who has qualified in the top 3 at every round, the only other driver to have won a round, woudl have to say it was a shocker to start from P2 with more fuel then all those around you and finish 4th, almost 5th. It was a poor result for a guy that looked strong after Q3, his only real mistake was the fluffed start

Webber had a poor qualifying run, and made his way up to P3 where he was on the bum of P2 at the checquered flag. I cant see how people are saying Vettel had the better race?!?!?!?! If you said Button or Heidfeld did then i would maybe agree...but anyway. :P

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

So that had nothing to do with the fact Massa HAD to conserve fuel to get him to the end of the GP?

I think you will find that he was the only guy in the mid to low 23s at the end of the race. Webber, Button and Rubens were all in the low to mid 25s. Poor Massa was way slower, losing 4 seconds per lap to Alonso if i recall.

So i think the time Baron is talking about was to the leaders, not Massa.

..anyway, differences of opinion are always good. Lets you see things from a different perspective. Hell, sometimes i even come around to others way of thinking...lol but not this time. It may be the only time this year that Webber finished ahead of his team mate after qualifying behind him :P

But i hope Vettel can go on to challege Button, be great for RBR. It will also be interesting to see if Webber can get a win this year. If this was Webber responding to the challenge that was Vettel then he was lucky, his response needs to be a better qualifying performance and demonstrating he is able to control a GP from the front and take a win, something Vettel has twice shown he is capable of

A few people have mentioned Webber's move on Alonso and i think that summed up his effort and also the lack of Vettel's.

Webber, plain and simple new he had to get around Alonso to be in the hunt, and did not give up, and pulled off what was a farking brilliant move.

Vettel again as others have said was behind Massa all race and didn't.

Personally I'm a big hater of the Webber hysteria anytime he finishes anywhere in the top ten, but that move was gold and i think summed up his wanting to win. In this race, that "want" was more than Vettel.

Now to move on, how serious does everyon think Toyota's and even Ferrari's threats are to leave if they don't get their way with the spending caps?

So that had nothing to do with the fact Massa HAD to conserve fuel to get him to the end of the GP?

that's my point exactly. vettel once passed massa picked up 2 seconds against the laps he was stuck behind massa. obviously when stuck behind massa his times will mimic massas. once in clear air he showed his pace. my point is, if he was that much faster he should have passed him waaay back, knowing full well that circulating as massas slow-ish pace was killing his race. not waited until massa was completely fked 4 laps from the end. and at that point massa's pace went way out the window. a lot more than 2s of vettel, but that's not relevant.

that's my point exactly. vettel once passed massa picked up 2 seconds against the laps he was stuck behind massa. obviously when stuck behind massa his times will mimic massas. once in clear air he showed his pace. my point is, if he was that much faster he should have passed him waaay back, knowing full well that circulating as massas slow-ish pace was killing his race. not waited until massa was completely fked 4 laps from the end. and at that point massa's pace went way out the window. a lot more than 2s of vettel, but that's not relevant.

I understand what you're saying and Massa did hold up Vettel, just by not as much as you're saying. Massa started fuel conservation almost immediately into the 3rd stint.

Yeh, i dont think the Ferrari pace was all that bad the whole race. I mean, when it all went to cow manure for Massa how far was he behind Button? It was less then 20 seconds so a huge improvement, and i suspect they had trouble with KERS as well as he wasnt seeming to use it every lap.

Which raises a question, does KERS affect fuel economy at all?

As for all the politicing at the moment, i think Maz s going to have to swallow some pride and step down from the rubbish they are proposing. Teams are agaisnt it, fans are against it..... all rather silly really

Yeh, i dont think the Ferrari pace was all that bad the whole race. I mean, when it all went to cow manure for Massa how far was he behind Button? It was less then 20 seconds so a huge improvement, and i suspect they had trouble with KERS as well as he wasnt seeming to use it every lap.

Which raises a question, does KERS affect fuel economy at all?

As for all the politicing at the moment, i think Maz s going to have to swallow some pride and step down from the rubbish they are proposing. Teams are agaisnt it, fans are against it..... all rather silly really

It would have to given the extra weight, or would that be compensated for by a reduced fuel useage during KERSage?

Massa's problem was with the actuall refueling though in that they thought all the fuel that was supposed to go in the car did, but it actually hadn't which they found out through the weight of the car. (Which apprantly is done at the end of each pit stop) which is why they knew way before the last few laps that he was short. I don't think it was a useage miscalculation.

It would have to given the extra weight, or would that be compensated for by a reduced fuel useage during KERSage?

I'm thinking probably not because the engine is still at full tilt with the extra coming in from KERS...... that's when it works however! Kimi apparently had issues with KERS again even before the GP started.

If Massa's KERS was playing up and he was not able to use it every lap, then surely Vettel in his quicker car should have been able to find a way past in the gazillion laps he spent behind him if he wanted it badly enough...

IMO Vettel botched his own chances off the start, mind you he certainly wasn't helped by his team it would seem. Much like Webber wasn't helped a couple of races ago...

KERS can only be used over 100km/h and for a max of 6sec per lap. That is why Massa didn't use KERS from the start line into turn 1. What I absolutely don't understand though is if a driver can only use it for a max of 6sec per lap why the hell wouldnt you use up that 6sec of kers every single lap? Doesn't matter if you are lapping by yourself or trying to catch the guy 20sec infront, use it every single lap otherwise its completely wasted.

Kimi's KERS was working at the beginning, he dropped back because he couldnt see the start lights.

Webbers strategy was nice, im quite surprised Vettel wasnt put onto the same strategy. Instead of Webber following Vettel whom was following Massa they fueled Webber long so that he could get by them by doing laps in open space, as was seen by Vettel that immediately picked up 2sec a lap once past Massa near the end.

Nice slip of the tongue by Webber too at the end just before going onto the podium :happy:

It would have to given the extra weight, or would that be compensated for by a reduced fuel useage during KERSage?

Massa's problem was with the actuall refueling though in that they thought all the fuel that was supposed to go in the car did, but it actually hadn't which they found out through the weight of the car. (Which apprantly is done at the end of each pit stop) which is why they knew way before the last few laps that he was short. I don't think it was a useage miscalculation.

They weigh the fuel rig, not the car

JB, RB and MW jumped out of their cars, got weighed then went upstairs to grab the bridgestone hats and dry themselves off with a towel as happens after every gp and they start talking to each other....

RB: I dont know how I lost the race

JB: I didnt think my 2 stop strategy would work

MW: Felipe f*cked up

He then realised the BBC camera was on him and immediately apologised lol.

Sparks will fly, Max and Bernie will sook and rage... Luca will flippin the you-know-what, Mario, Dietrich and John will soon follow suit. The GPWC boys will race in the shade if CVC's lawsuits blot out the sun...

Ferrari's Board of Directors, chaired by Luca di Montezemolo, held a meeting on Tuesday at their Maranello headquarters to discuss business matters, but high on the order were the recent decisions taken by the FIA's World Motor Sport Council regarding the controversial budget cap option beginning next year.

Under the 2010 regulations, teams opting to limit their budgets to 45 million Euros ($60m US) would enjoy much greater technical freedom than other teams, effectively creating a 'two-tier' series within Formula One.

Many teams find the matter unacceptable as it currently stands, and the FIA's deadline of May 29th in order to file entries for the 2010 championship only added pressure to an already volatile situation with some teams speaking of boycotts.

Today Ferrari has boldly stated that, unless common ground can be found, it will retire from Formula One at the end of the current season.

http://en.f1-live.com/f1/en/headlines/news...512175405.shtml

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pete knows these cars well, he does my car too, if he was concerned about the traction arm length for your use he would have said so. Do you have adjustable bushes in that arm, maybe he got enough adjustment there (or maybe the bump steer was not material for your use of the car)
    • Hmm. Yes. I should have been clearer. 1000s for Haltech, for extra headroom. 725s for Nistune. You might even be OK with 640s, but if the possible power ends up much more than 300 rwkW you will run out of headroom on the 640s. That would probably be OK and a signal to not push it to that sort of power with Nistune anyway. At that level you probably do want to be thinking about engine protection functions. Oh, and all of that presumes 98 only, not E85. Well....the 1000s would allow you to run E85 at ~300rwkW territory, again, maybe sort of running out of headroom. Hard to tell with E85 - depends on the tuner as to how rich they like to set it up.
    • Yes.  The only scenario I can imagine when the answer isn't yes, is if you drive like there is highway patrol behind you at all times.  If your car currently runs, enjoy it and keep saving. Better costs more, keep saving until you can budget the better ECU. It's worth it.  Nope. Plenty of us making >300kw on unopened motors. Mine is unopened and makes about 350kw if I turn everything up, its fine (lots of caveats here, how the car will be used/abused, how long you expect the engine to last between rebuilds, how has the engine been maintained prior to coming into your ownership, etc etc).   
    • Sorry just wanting to clarify, at this power goal, which should I be going? Also, More info regarding suspension, the rear upper camber arms were used to get the camber back to i believe around -0.5 ~ -1 degree (@ Road and Race in Rydalmere), I forgot the exact figure, but ALOT less camber than what it came originally which was like -2.5degrees. Are the traction arms still recommended? The bilsteins from SydneyKid, they've got 400lb/in fronts & 275/in in the rear, revalved to his specs. Intercooler, I'm just having a look at some on Rakuten.jp and some other japanese sites. Might get something from back there, GReddy, Blitz or HPI, all crossflow. Looking at roughly $450-$500 AUD + shipping... Theres not many choices except that chinese branded Justjap unless you go for blitz return flow. Yeah, only downside with Haltech is the price ahhaha, so expensive, and with all the sensors if I go that route... $$$$$ yeesh. Are headstuds/gaskets needed for <300akw?
×
×
  • Create New...