Jump to content
SAU Community

2009 F1 Season


dezz
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I think we can all agree hamilton is a cock. he's now known for his great hero moves that only ever come off if the other guy lets it happen, or he has a miracle. most of the times (like turn 1 nurburger) he ends up off the track and rapidly loosing spots. he really is a clown driver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasnt it the GP after he got d1cked by the FIA for SPA? So he was driving a little agro that weekend daring the FIA to penalise him again :mellow:

yeah LH was stripped of his victory at Spa becuase he cut the corner (at the bus stop chicane) and failed to yeld position. I remember this well because it was a real close quarters battle because the rain was coming down on spa and they (LH and KR) was battling for the lead, KR broke early and LH took advantage but KR wouldn't yeld which forced LH to cut the corner to take the lead. LH gave the lead back to KR on the front straight and at turn one, LH passed and went on to win the race (KR crashed out). Stewards investigated that incident and gave LH a 25 second penalty moving him from 1st to 3rd.

What do you think of Jean Todt becoming FIA President...why Mr. Spanky (Mosely) throwing his support behind him? from what I've read, Ari Vatanen has also thrown his hat into ring for the job.. Personally I would like to see Ari Vatanen be president...someone who's not from F1 and be netural....If Todt became president...you can see all the Ferrari haters come out and say that the FIA will protect Ferrari

Edited by BigDirtyJase
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure Todt was successful at Ferrari but is he that much of a Ferrari man? I mean he has a history with Peugot as well..he walked away from a CEO position...so perhaps its a little different if he was leaving a Ferrari position to fill the FIA role...or am i giving the guy too much credit hoping he is professional enough to not be biased by his former employer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah LH was stripped of his victory at Spa becuase he cut the corner (at the bus stop chicane) and failed to yeld position. I remember this well because it was a real close quarters battle because the rain was coming down on spa and they (LH and KR) was battling for the lead, KR broke early and LH took advantage but KR wouldn't yeld which forced LH to cut the corner to take the lead. LH gave the lead back to KR on the front straight and at turn one, LH passed and went on to win the race (KR crashed out). Stewards investigated that incident and gave LH a 25 second penalty moving him from 1st to 3rd.

What do you think of Jean Todt becoming FIA President...why Mr. Spanky (Mosely) throwing his support behind him? from what I've read, Ari Vatanen has also thrown his hat into ring for the job.. Personally I would like to see Ari Vatanen be president...someone who's not from F1 and be netural....If Todt became president...you can see all the Ferrari haters come out and say that the FIA will protect Ferrari

Well I would like to see Ari Vatanen over Mosely. Maybe that way the WRC would get looked after properly instead of being permanantly fkd about.

He is already a politician so doubtless will be familair with the back stabbings etc. Hard to see how he could do any worse than Max has done these last few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"deliberately moving across on RB" eh, see thats an assumption on your part so drop the 'I am so objective' act. Your are assuming intent by using the word "deliberately" when you have no way of knowing what MW's intention was. Plus he has given a perfectly reasonable explanation which you obviously do not accept. Which is your right of course but at the same time shows your bias.

Also why would MW intentionally try to hit RB and so consequentially risk damage to his own car? Does not make sense.

Any moron knows he didn't intentionally try and hit RB. He obviously tryed to intimidate RB into getting out of the throttle... it didn't work and they made contact.

So who steered Mark's car towards Rubens car?

How exactly am I being biased? What because I don't take the word of an Australian GP driver as gospel..... You know nothing about me so you can assume whatever it is that pleases you :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Mark banged in to Rubens, shit happens, he had a little brain explosion, usually its Rubens baning into everyone lol.

Its done, the penalty served and no harm no foul. lets get over it and look forwad to Hungary. Red Bull one two anyone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think for Mark to still go out and win either with the penalty is testament to his team's budget, and the ability of the designers/engineers to build the fastest car.

fixed :iluvff:

it has been proved over and over again that the driver is far less of a factor in performance than the car. how many times has someone gone from world champion to being lapped the next season. No WDC in the current series is in the top 5 and it's not because they suddenly forgot how to drive.

every one of those drivers is in the top 1% of driver ability in the world. But I bet none of them are among the best 50 drivers in the world....it takes way more than being a talented driver to get to the top. Otherwise fatz would be running a red bull this year

the behaviour of f1 drivers in blocking and carrying on in a straight line is disgraceful and has been going on far too long. It's right up there with going 110% to catch a safety car instead of slowing to a safe speed. I don't care who does it or what country they come from it is dirty driving

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the behaviour of f1 drivers in blocking and carrying on in a straight line is disgraceful and has been going on far too long. I don't care who does it or what country they come from it is dirty driving

My sentiments exactly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fixed :iluvff:

it has been proved over and over again that the driver is far less of a factor in performance than the car. how many times has someone gone from world champion to being lapped the next season. No WDC in the current series is in the top 5 and it's not because they suddenly forgot how to drive.

every one of those drivers is in the top 1% of driver ability in the world. But I bet none of them are among the best 50 drivers in the world....it takes way more than being a talented driver to get to the top. Otherwise fatz would be running a red bull this year

the behaviour of f1 drivers in blocking and carrying on in a straight line is disgraceful and has been going on far too long. It's right up there with going 110% to catch a safety car instead of slowing to a safe speed. I don't care who does it or what country they come from it is dirty driving

Pretty big call to make that none of them are in the top 50 in the world. I'm not saying you're wrong, but it's kinda hard to prove a statement like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah I could never prove anything one way or another. but I know a lot of drivers and a lot of race drivers, and the most naturally gifted drivers I know don't race cars.

webber for example, never won any national championship here in aus....skaife on the other hand won 2 in the same year (F Holden and touring cars)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeh, how many attempts did Webber ever make to win a series? I mean, if he came 2nd or 3rd in his first year did he ever hang around to try again the next year? Was it Bright or Kelly that beat him in Formula Ford?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Webber might not have ever won a national championship but I'm sure if he hung around in each series until he won said championship then he wouldn't be where he is today. I'm sure that if any of you guys came 2nd or 3rd in the ute series and then got a drive in the V8's you wouldn't be saying "no I wont do that yet cause i haven't won the ute series" You'd all jump at the chance. He simply advanced he career as fast as he could just as anyone would and no matter what any of you think of his driving ability he's racing F1 and your not. Besides it's a well know fact that if your parents don't have money and lots of it then your not going to be a race car driver, Dick Johnson even said it him self in an interview a few years ago.

You can complain as much as you like about current driving styles/standards but you all have to remember that F1 is a business and teams and drivers will do whatever they can get away with to win and make the big dollars and that means blocking on straights and racing to catch a safety car. It's just the same as a telemarketer calling at 8pm to try and sell you something. We all hate it and it's rude as hell but they're aloud to do it so they will to make money. Any form of top level motorsport is the same. Hell, club motorsport can be the same. If your half a lap behind the safety car and about to restart your going to push to close the gap so your not left behind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Webber has hardly brought the big bucks to the teams he has driven for so there is a fair bit of merit to most drivers there with a few notable exceptions from Japan and India in recent years.

You need to be a jockey to race formula 1 so that ruled out some great drivers like Walter Rohrl. Clearly the best drivers in the world won't all be 55-65kg runts with massive egos and/or chins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeh, my observation wasnt a criticism. He never won any feeder series because generally to do so you have to hang around longer then a single season. Second season you get picked up by a better team and then with the experience of the team, tracks and championships you make a run at it in your second or 3rd effort.

Mark on ability was able to catach the attention of the people at TWR, Mercedes, Flavio and Benetton...all on ability. He got his F1 seat at Minardi becase he was an Aussie , but his testing for Benetton, Arrows (Driving for them in F3000) shows that he either gives great reach arounds or guys that know far more about motorsport then any of us ever will thought the guy could drive and had potential.

So that is enough for me...if the likes of Mercedes, TWR, Flavio, Frank Williams, Christian Horner think the guy deserves a paid seat, just based on testing ability and from what they haev seen of him. Another thing, is he has never been dropped from a driving line up so its not like any of his F1 teams have shown him the door. He has always left based on a stronger race offer.

So, doesnt really mean anything, other then i dont think not winning FF, F3000 etc isnt a huge sin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any moron knows he didn't intentionally try and hit RB. He obviously tryed to intimidate RB into getting out of the throttle... it didn't work and they made contact.

So who steered Mark's car towards Rubens car?

How exactly am I being biased? What because I don't take the word of an Australian GP driver as gospel..... You know nothing about me so you can assume whatever it is that pleases you :/

:D I'm only going on what you actually said, not in the mind reading business :domokun:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well.... yes and perhaps no. It depends on what you mean by "spool". For most of us, the point that we would describe as where the turbo is "spooling" is the point where the wheel speed gets high enough for it to start making some boost. This is coincidentally around about the point where it starts making noise - hence the "spooling" sound. If that is what you mean, then no - the wastegate should still be shut at this point. The boost will still be way below the point where it should start opening. If, on the other hand, you mean "spool" as "reach full boost", then yes. At the point where the boost has reached target, then boost control has already started. The wastegate is already open, and has been for some time. Some short time, definitely, but still, some time. If you have no boost controller - just the wastegate actuator connected to the boost source, then you have a mechanical system working as a pressure balance. There is pressure on one side of the wastegate actuator's diaphragm from the spring, and pressure on the other side coming from the boost measurement location (the "source"). This is not a digital thing. The wastegate does not stay shut until the boost pressure reaches the spring "pressure". The spring will start to compress as soon as you start to apply any pressure onto it. This can be controlled somewhat by adding pre-load into the spring, but you cannot add enough preload to make it into a digital switch behaviour. The wastegate will crack open and start to leak exhaust out (and therefore not though the turbine) well before you reach the target boost pressure. Electronic (and some mechanical/pneumatic) boost controllers will act to prevent the boost source applying pressure to the actuator until just before you reach target boost, thus preventing the wastegate from creeping open. And some boost controllers will apply boost pressure on the spring side to further push it shut. And this can be be necessary because the exhaust pressure in the manifold also pushes on the wastegate valve and tries to open it and you cab get it leaking even without it being connected to the boost source.
    • A stand alone boost controller will not give you the control you need, unlike a modern ECU. Your boost will always naturally target the wastegate's opening pressure first, your controller then will allow you to add more boost as required.
    • I recently discovered that I could not remove the outer bolt on one of my rear UCAs. Looked like it was seized to the crush tube. It wasn't all that long since I had last had that arm out (I dunno exactly, but certainly <2 yrs), so I was a bit surprised. I thought I had stock bushes in the rear knuckles, so I ordered some new PU bushes and resigned myself to having to do some dismantlery....and some butchery. It was clear that the seized bush was going to need to have the bolt cut out of it and then possibly some more brutality after that. Upon getting the 3x arms on each side disconnected from the knuckles (with the exception of the seized one, of course), I discovered that I had in fact put PU bushes into the knuckles when I did the subframe conversion about 12-13 years ago. So, I say "Oh, good, I might not have to swap any of these others out". We set to work butchering the bolt out of the seized arm. Stainless blade in a big-arse Milwaukee recipro made short work of it, and also damaged the arm, which added a welding and grinding and painting step to the whole exercise. During the butchery it became clear that the bolt was not just seized but bent. Head scratching ensued, as it is hard to understand how that bolt could get bent. I did suffer a broken (stock) toe control arm on that side a few months ago, and drove some miles with some significant rear wheel self steer and lack of control, which probably was the cause. But it's still hard to understand how it would bend that bolt, rather than just bend the arm. But here's the start of the real discoveries. The crush tube was rusty as all shit. I mean seriously rusty. A little on the inside, contributing to the tube seizing to the bolt (along with the bend). But the outside had at least 2-3mm of compressed flaky iron oxide jammed in between the parent metal and the PU bush. This one was brutalised and still took some effort to get the PU off the crush tube. So I thought I'd inspect the others more closely. The one on the tension rod adjacent the bent one was first. I had to use a 2-jaw puller to get the crush tube out, and it took some effort. It came out looking like the first one. All 6 of them were the same, except for one that looked not too bad. Had some corrosion on it, but was mostly OK. There was also a significant amount of corrosion on the inner surfaces of the knuckles. They took some convincing with pointy tools to let go their grip on the inside of the holes they were in. There was no sign of the original (SuperPro) lube anywhere. I and my bro-in-law have never seen any crush tube end up looking like this. It was seriously like the car has spent time putting boats into the water at the boat ramp. So, it seems like the PU might have been bonded to the steel on both sides, which would have to make them work more like stock rubber bushes (where arm deflection results in twist inside the rubber). Despite this, I have never had cause to believe that they were so tightly bound up. The suspension moved up and down much as you'd expect. The car never made any noises in those bushes that would have led me to believe there was a problem. Maybe the rusty interfaces actually were "sliding". Anyway, lesson learnt. Even quiet, non-troublesome PU bushes should be inspected every now and then!
    • the boost controller allows you to adjust the opening of the wastegate (which only has one preset spring) I'm going to see how it acts on it
    • I studied the principle of wastegate to begin with. so if I understood correctly. the moment when the turbo "spool" is where the boost control begins. When the target level of "psi" is reached the wastegate opens to regulate the exhaust pressure passing through the turbo and thus control its speed and the rate of boost
×
×
  • Create New...