Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I got my car back on the road for the festive season and it went well for several days.

Does anyone remember me splitting my stock harmonic balancer in two last year? To avoid that misery I again I invested in a Professional Products Powerforce Plus SFI racing spec Harmonic Balancer, and had it shipped over from the USA, and bolted it to the front end of my L28 late last year. In less than 2,000 kms I did this to it.

It has actually split in two, and the outer section spins freely around the inner section.

Who'd have thought?

post-26626-1230852409_thumb.jpg

i would say, at a guess, that your engine is out of balance. maybe an odd piston, or a poorly balanced or mismatched reciprocating set.

ive had some fairly angry L series eninges in my time, and have only ever used stock balancers. never ever broke one.

There is some underlying problem there.

cheers

Jason

Hey Jason,

The stock balancer split on the smokey old L26 that came out of the wrecked rally car that I bought in 2006; could have been a myriad of unknown problems there. However the performance balancer that I just broke in the pic was on my recently built L28. I had the crank/flywheel/balancer assembly machined and balanced and the bores honed and pistons machined to match deck height by Motor Improvements (engine builders in Vic)... but I never considered that I might have a mismatched set of pistons.

Now I don't know what to think. I didn't recycle the pistons or crank from my L26... Could it be that I was just unlucky twice?

id be on the phone to Motor Improvements if i were in your shoes.

the last time i heard of a harmonic balancer 'letting go' was because something was dropped on it and it was damaged (only very slightly).

i do hope your problem is the best case scenario :happy:

I swear I didn't drop it! I'd be to embarrassed to post if I did. Pics have been sent to Motor Sports Auto, the supplier, and forwarded to Professional Products, the manufacturer. It's a first as far as anyone knows! We'll see what they make of it, and what they want to do about it.

I should have been an engineer, destructive testing seems to be my forte.

  • 4 weeks later...

I have replaced the busted pulley with a light-weight billet aluminium number out of the states. The car has since developed an interesting new trick. It does some amazing low-rider style bunny hops when I try to pull away from low revs.

While this might be the latest installment in my never-ending untunable SU carby idiocy, a mate has suggested that driving with a damaged harmonic balancer can put unholy forces on the crank and bend it. Anyone ever done this? What happens when you try to drive with a bent crank?

I have replaced the busted pulley with a light-weight billet aluminium number out of the states. The car has since developed an interesting new trick. It does some amazing low-rider style bunny hops when I try to pull away from low revs.

While this might be the latest installment in my never-ending untunable SU carby idiocy, a mate has suggested that driving with a damaged harmonic balancer can put unholy forces on the crank and bend it. Anyone ever done this? What happens when you try to drive with a bent crank?

Rarely will the crank bend.. The L serries cranks are internaly balanced. The harmonic balancer does what the name says. Harmonics. Pretty sure your crank will be fine. You might find with the aluminum Balancer has changed the mass on the crank and you now notice the Su carb problem

Thanks for the replies. Fingers crossed that the crank is all good. The problem occured in 42 degree heat, so mass change/temperature may well have caused more carby madness.

I recently tried dynoing the car and couldn't. At certain rev ranges the car ran so rich it went of the measureable scale. I hate the SU's and as soon as I have the cash I'll source triples from the states. Most of the problems with how the car runs have been carby related. I've spent about $2,000 trying to get them right and are not even close. Can't wait to bin them and try something different.

Thanks for the replies. Fingers crossed that the crank is all good. The problem occured in 42 degree heat, so mass change/temperature may well have caused more carby madness.

I recently tried dynoing the car and couldn't. At certain rev ranges the car ran so rich it went of the measureable scale. I hate the SU's and as soon as I have the cash I'll source triples from the states. Most of the problems with how the car runs have been carby related. I've spent about $2,000 trying to get them right and are not even close. Can't wait to bin them and try something different.

For 2K, you could off had a sweet EFI system.

Nigel

I'm with you on that one Drew. I also had SU's ( shitty upstarts). 3 x I had to take them back to a guy who was supposed to be a SU guru. I'd drive it for 15 min and the plugs would foul. My webers on the other hand are beauuuutiful and I'm not afraid to have a go at tuning them either." Go the webers". Sorry to hear your having these ongoing dramas, if it makes you feel any better I also wasted about $1300 on my SU set up. Sold them for $250 with manifold, good ridence. Ricky

Don't mean to offend those of you who do have good set ups, I'm sure there's plenty of good ones.

From what I hear 240z dome-top carbies are more than tunable in the right hands, but 260z or 2" English SU are a real pig, and most carby guys either don't know how to tune them properly, or aren't interested in even trying.

My 240Z round-tops weren't a problem to keep in reasonable tune - I generally gave the idle & mixtures a tweak at each service. Having said that, I was determined to run EFI, and 18 months after buying the car, I had aftermarket EFI & a TO4 doing the deed...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...