New Hoon Laws In Planning Again

[dan_the_man]

Hey Dan, it was a friends son. This guy knows the Australian Constitution off the top of his head, nothing can go against it. The only way to change the constitution is through a bill, I am pretty certain they will never change that one.

Even Local Councils are against the Constitution, said friend doesn't pay and hasn't paid rates for years. Yes the Council took him to court, he said his case and said that should they pursue it he will make it very public. They dropped it. I can go on for ages about it, remind me next time I see ya.

This guy is even a retired police officer, a very smart man.

any chance you could get the case name for us?

[TAKUSHI]

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=l53lbanVn3c

Looks australian to me... stupid media

yeah i sent today tonight an email bout my view on their whole getting the news article right but

dunno that they're care, i mean the vid was from 07, cant hurt to try i spose

[Stealthed]

yeah i sent today tonight an email bout my view on their whole getting the news article right but

dunno that they're care, i mean the vid was from 07, cant hurt to try i spose

Haha lol, please..if they send something back let us know, because we all know its not australian footage, pretty sure it was a closed of hill in jap land if i remember but dont quote me on tat.

[mickey]

I sincerely doubt you would get the case thrown out based on it was unconstitutional in the lower courts. Some guy quoting some bits from the constitution would just get laughed at. You'd expect someone would have brought up that argument with the criminal confiscation laws which allow you to be sentenced for the offence and the DPP then grab your assets even if it wasn't derived from the crime.

Unless you provide some details of the case and it's not just 'a friend of a friend told me' then it is useless spreading that rumour. And if it is true, why not tell everyone so that people can use the defense or have the laws changed? Really, if it did get thrown out it would be appealed all the way to the High Court by the government to decide if it was unconstitutional as the news would be all over the case and today tonight would be having a cry.

[Char]

someone i know got done last night lost their car for 7days first offence, i thought you got ur car taken only on 2nd offence?

wasnt a skyline btw.. wrx

[mickey]

they may have amended the legislation. I believe 2nd offence is up to 3 months anyway. I thought 1st offence was 48 hours but maybe that has changed.

3rd offence is they take the car and sell it.

Edited January 10, 2009 by mickey

[dan_the_man]

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/wa/cons...974111/s79.html