Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I've already done a search for this but couldn't find that much on the subject.

How feasible is it to adapt the RB26DETT turbo setup onto the RB25DET and how much power will the standard twin turbo setup allow ?

I'm aiming for around 450bhp at the flywheel and I've been offered a complete GTR twin setup for a reasonable price, about a 1/3 the price of the manifold I'd need for a GT30 setup so its quite tempting.

What difficulties need to be overcome to get them to fit ? I've read that the exhaust manifolds have a different stud pattern which I think I can overcome either by re-welding the flanges or by getting a spacer plate fabricated but are the exhaust ports the same shape on the RB26 and the RB25 ?

Does anyone know if the block feeds are in the same place for the water and oil lines ?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25123-rb26dett-turbo-setup-on-rb25det/
Share on other sites

Guest RedLineGTR

Would like to know if that would work to. even a stock DETT setup would it bolt on to a DET block and what would u have to change i would guess oil lines water exhaust...andything else. Sorry to hijack the thread but on similar topic. Cheers Rob

Hi Guys, how do you propose to run 2 AFM's? The wiring harness only has capacity for one. Ditto the ECU. The RB26 oil pump has additional flow for the extra turbo, ditto the water pump. You can't use the standard RB26 turbo outlet piping as the exhaust cam cover fouls it. How do you propose to run 2 lambda sensors? The wiring harness only has capacity for one. Ditto the ECU.

I don't recommend cutting and welding the cast manifolds, the exhaust heat will most likely cause cracking. You could make an adaptor for the exhaust manifold, but I don't know how you would be able to do up the lower bolts on #3, # 4 & #5.

If it was easy there would be heaps around, I've never seen one, how about anyone else?

Originally posted by Sydneykid

Hi Guys, how do you propose to run 2 AFM's?  The wiring harness only has capacity for one.  Ditto the ECU.   The RB26 oil pump has additional flow for the extra turbo, ditto the water pump.  You can't use the standard RB26 turbo outlet piping as the exhaust cam cover fouls it.  How do you propose to run 2 lambda sensors? The wiring harness only has capacity for one.  Ditto the ECU.

I don't recommend cutting and welding the cast manifolds, the exhaust heat will most likely cause cracking.  You could make an adaptor for the exhaust manifold, but I don't know how you would be able to do up the lower bolts on #3, # 4 & #5.

If it was easy there would be heaps around, I've never seen one, how about anyone else?

Hi,

Good questions, quite a lot I hadn't even thought about :(

First of all the engines actually going to go into my UK spec 200SX S13. I already have a GReddy E-manage running a Z32 AFM on the current CA18DET so the plan is to use the Z32 AFM with the E-manage on the RB. I will have to construct a Y piece to join the turbo inlets to the back of the AFM. The turbo outlet pipes will be fabricated to clear the Cam covers.

I wasn't really anticipating the oil pump and water pump flow to be a problem to be honest. I've seen SR20's and CA18's with twin turbo setups that used the standard pumps and I presumed the RB25 standard items would be able to cope. Could be a problem.

Lambda sensors - I was only planning to use one but I haven''t decided whether to use one of the original sensors behind one of the turbos as per the GTR setup or place the lambda sensor further down after the two downpipes have joined together. I will need to fabricate new downpipes anyway.

The main problem, as you say Sydneykid, is going to be the manifold stud pattern. I've heard (and this could be a load of crap) that the reason the exhaust flanges are different on the RB26 is due to the manifold pipe layout for the twin turbo setup.

I was originally thinking of cutting and welding the relevant manifold flanges but from my own experiences with a T3 adapted CA18DET manifold the heat generally does cause cracking as you suggested so I think I'll need to have a steel spacer plate fabricated. I'll use longer studs and captive studs where necessary.

I can foresee a further problem here, the spacer plate will have to be made fairly thick to prevent warping etc. The RB's going in an S13 not a Skyline so I may have clearance problems on the suspension turret when I use the spacer plate. It may actually be easier to fabricate two 3 branch tubular manifold than adapt the RB26 setup.

I know there is an S13 in Australia with an RB25DETT but I haven't been able to find out much about it.

The main reason I'm contemplating it is down to cost. It will cost me around £2500 to £3000 to get a GT30, wastegate and manifold sent from Oz to the UK......I can get a low mileage GTR twin turbo setup for around £350. Even allowing for fabrication costs it should work out a lot cheaper.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I definitely agree with you there - I never click on content for cars I would never ever be able to get or compete with/against/be seen next to. Seeing a MX5 compete with a FD RX7 will make people upset though, for sure. Even in 2.5L Turbo form which is pretty grass roots. (or at least as grass roots as classic cars can be) Yes we're all classic car owners now.
    • Wonder what the cause is, but here's hoping it's nothing too serious.
    • People don't always want builds that are overly expensive, or have engineering/registration/insurance issues and head aches that come with them Whilst big dollar builds, and complicated stuff is interesting to watch, there is only a tiny % of people who would actually use this information, or have the spare finances to drop on said builds, whereas the buy a cheap(ish) cool car, and make it better, with a average budget, that the average Joe or Jane could achieve will always be a winner in my opinion 
    • Bit of a thread revival, you mentioned wanting a bit more top end before, do you regret not going with the 1.01?
    • It's kind of interesting - They definitely do builds that split the difference between what they like and what will generate views and engagement. The NC Platform always surprises everyone in a good way, in an uncomfortably good way some may say. They could throw a LS in there and arguably have the best (and best performing) car of the entire stable. But that isn't necessarily what draws views, because people viewing don't want to accept the vegetables of a LS NC MX5 being a superior vehicle in every way (including fun) than a RB26 240Z. This is also why there's not a lot of content about the GR Yaris (on the web in general). They're too good, yet 'only a Yaris' The community doesn't want certain cars to be as good as they are - to beat their hero cars, and I believe the NC MX5 is absolutely one of those cars.
×
×
  • Create New...