Jump to content
SAU Community

Dating Blocks By Engine Number


webber
 Share

Recommended Posts

OK guys, basically the way this will work is:

I need your co-operation on the following:

Please state: Model, year & month (if not the first4 digits of your vin) & the first 3 digits of your engine number.

I.E. R33, Nov 95, (or alternatively ECR33-0633xx) & RB25-145xxx (could even specify S1.5)

from this information we can then compile a list to give approximations of what date an engine might be.

I.E. the RB26 list so far looks like the following:

R32 1994 45xxx

R33 1995 March 51xxx

R33 1995 May 55xxx

R33 1997 Feb 63xxx

Please only post if your car has the original eninge fitted thanks

cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RB26 List

R32 1994 July 42xxx

R32 1994 45xxx

R33 1995 March 51xxx

R33 1995 May 55xxx

R33 1997 Feb 63xx

RB25 List

R33 1995 Jan RB25-116xxx

R33 1995 Nov RB25-145xxx (S1.5 - Later coil packs)

RB20 List

Keep them coming guys, Hey cartman, sorry i couldn't use your information, if you don't know what month/year, i can look it up through nissan fast, from the full or partial vin number cheers...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RB26 List

R32 1994 July 42xxx

R32 1994 45xxx

R33 1995 March 51xxx

R33 1995 May 55xxx

R33 1997 Feb 63xx

RB25 List

R33 1995 Jan RB25-116xxx

R33 1995 Nov RB25-145xxx (S1.5 - Later coil packs)

RB20 List

Keep them coming guys, Hey cartman, sorry i couldn't use your information, if you don't know what month/year, i can look it up through nissan fast, from the full or partial vin number cheers...

Mines doesn't have a number just RB26, I have been told thats beacuse it was bought new from nissan. Its 2.7 by HKS in japan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey cartman, sorry i couldn't use your information, if you don't know what month/year, i can look it up through nissan fast, from the full or partial vin number cheers...

will pm them thru to you sometime tomorrow!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool guys, i am actually going out shortly to check some of my other skylines and get there details, once i have those i will report back. that would be top work cartman. Cheers...

RB20 & RB25 numbers will most likely be all over the show as they were used in other model cars. But we may be able to get somewhere with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just checked some more of my liners

R33 1993 Aug RB25-59xxx

R33 1993 Aug RB25-63xxx

R34 2000 Sep RB25-375xxx (S2 Neo)

RB25 List

R33 1993 Aug RB25-59xxx

R33 1993 Aug RB25-63xxx

R33 1995 Jan RB25-116xxx (S2 coil packs & AFM)

R33 1995 Nov RB25-145xxx (S2 coil packs & AFM)

R34 2000 Sep RB25-375xxx (S2 Neo)

This will be handy as i have a heap of engines, that hopefully soon i can work out what date etc they are

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...