Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 145
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Originally posted by meggala

well endless on its first run taken very carefully with a missed gearchange no tyre heating ran a 12.7 @ 121

then it poped an axel on the second run :D

 and a couple of the bmt 180's ran mid to low 12's

meggala

Thats a good time for its first time out, and the MPH shows there is more in the car. But why would you run full drag slicks, and not warm them up? If they didnt think the driveline was up to the task, why put them on?

yer was a good night, lots of good form all round form the jap cars :D what i love to see, but maaaaan i cant wait to see endless unleash its fury on the strip LOL

hopefully my 'beast'*cough* not *cough* will be ready soon so i can have some fun doing shit times :D

mad a 12.05 in a 180!! nice one sam....

GTR34 thats an awesome time! did u run that time or ur dad? regardless its still mad....

ps. hurry up and send me the rest of those pics so i can finish ur background and stuff :D

ok cool :P when ya ready...

should be going to the next calder night cause i havent run my car since i upped the boost, installed the clutch and put the dump and front pipe on... hoping for mid 14s... which wont be too bad on stock cooler and turb.

Originally posted by inark

mad a 12.05 in a 180!! nice one sam....

mmm... *cough*gimme slicks too*cough* :P;)

Nice run sam, pity about all the hassles at calder huh?

and yep... i got a 12 !

12.98... just a 12, but still better than a 13.05 :)

and then i think i broke something on the next run bugger it. Oh well, the fun of racing

I though that endless car was quick... 121 mph is fairly ordinary for a car that's got as much power as that's supposed to have.

Should have cracked 130 easily...

matt

Originally posted by meggala

well endless on its first run taken very carefully with a missed gearchange no tyre heating ran a 12.7 @ 121

then it poped an axel on the second run :D

 and a couple of the bmt 180's ran mid to low 12's

meggala

the word straight from the track

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean this in no disrespect to u mate; Are there clear tagged examples/explanations in our SAU forum for example, in my interest, this is how to do R34 Gtt suspension the right way? U guys did so much taking risks with experimentation that deserves recognition and those results helps us morons take the RIGHT path to buy quality / buy once. 🍻
    • Pretty much what you'd expect at that power level. Hypergear turbo, long list of supporting mods, full Haltech catalogue, etc.  I'd say this goes for most drivers, suspension is still a dark art for most people. And it's really hard to convince someone how much better their setup could be...  
    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
×
×
  • Create New...