Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Id like the car to rev up from idle to making boost quicker, didnt get a torque reading last tune so i dont know what its got, getting the crank knife edged and the other bits and peices balanced should help ive been told, not sure if i want a lightened flywheel at present.

Thanks MLR

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

well Nismoid...as i am no mechanic...i just paid Xspeed..2 give me a lil down low increase in torque...in the lower rev range....massively increase flow...creating instant power down low....got my air + fuel ratio 2 adjust with the extra air(more air+fuel =more power...)...not as hard as u make it seem nisrod.....(mr expert)... twins spool up nice and early like nismoids...3400-3700...always ready 4 acceleration whatever gear .....

as i said im no expert paid 4 this 2 get done.... thats why i said oversize everything...more air more power is the fundamentals....of course u have 2 tune fuel and air right... or am i just totally wrong....any 1 want 2 eleborate? good 2 know anyway.

post-58752-1233061525_thumb.jpg

Rb26 Plenum with the muilt throttle body setup;

is it cheap? no

is it a head f**k to put one on? yes

is it worth it ? yes

would i do it again? no f**k that just get a 26 lol

i gain a whole heap of responds and torque from putting that setup on my 25, i have power everywhere.

Edited by [Michael]
well Nismoid...as i am no mechanic...i just paid Xspeed..2 give me a lil down low increase in torque...in the lower rev range....massively increase flow...creating instant power down low....got my air + fuel ratio 2 adjust with the extra air(more air+fuel =more power...)...not as hard as u make it seem nisrod.....(mr expert)... twins spool up nice and early like nismoids...3400-3700...always ready 4 acceleration whatever gear .....

as i said im no expert paid 4 this 2 get done.... thats why i said oversize everything...more air more power is the fundamentals....of course u have 2 tune fuel and air right... or am i just totally wrong....any 1 want 2 eleborate? good 2 know anyway.

Well I have standard size everything from plenum, to manifolds, to cams... and I'm on sooner than you are by the sound of that.

amazing no?

And i have little to no doubt my transient response on/off boost would be markedly better.

fair enough...but...my base statement is not a comparison 2 how early yours spools up... but does more air with the correct air fuel mixture create more instant power.....thats all i said m8.....u do get more power and torque from this....who gives a f**k about when your turbo kicks in hey.....oversizing gives u more n/a power with or with out a turbo...so when u do it 2 a turbo engine that is equivelant to yours...u have more torque before and after the turbo spools...

sooooo....my initial comment....oversizing (air/fuel) mixture gives u cheap low down power/torque... am i right or wrong...

nismoid..... not saying thats all u need...but its a good start....

and ...sorry i thought a stock rb26 in comparisson to an rb25 plenum is oversized...flows more air doenst it....oversized part for an rb25....thought compared 2 whatever stock part...if it's bigger..its classed as oversized? my bad....

not tryin 2 start shit bro..but ive done it...works good 4 me...like u might be on boost kwikr then me..but i might have twice the torque u do at the same rpm? :)

post-58752-1233066226_thumb.png

.....oversizing gives u more n/a power with or with out a turbo...so when u do it 2 a turbo engine that is equivelant to yours...u have more torque before and after the turbo spools...

sooooo....my initial comment....oversizing (air/fuel) mixture gives u cheap low down power/torque... am i right or wrong...

nismoid..... not saying thats all u need...but its a good start....

not tryin 2 start shit bro..but ive done it...works good 4 me...like u might be on boost kwikr then me..but i might have twice the torque u do at the same rpm? :)

Why does your run stop at 6,000rpm? Sure, get the A:F right and wind the ignition in there to get max torque from a setup, but "high flowing" to means you are compromising low-mid rpm gas velocity which harms cylinder filling which harms torque which means gas velocity is slowed so less gas flow to spin that turbo to get it onto boost.

But meh....why spend thousands of dollars for small gains, we are not competitive race teams striving for small gains. Go down some cans, jump a plane to somewhere different...do strange things to exotic girls in uncomfortable places and come back to your car after 5 weeks of happy days to a car that is 1/10 of a second slower or has a tad less throttle response :mage:

fair enough...but...my base statement is not a comparison 2 how early yours spools up... but does more air with the correct air fuel mixture create more instant power.....thats all i said m8.....u do get more power and torque from this....who gives a f**k about when your turbo kicks in hey.....oversizing gives u more n/a power with or with out a turbo...so when u do it 2 a turbo engine that is equivelant to yours...u have more torque before and after the turbo spools...

sooooo....my initial comment....oversizing (air/fuel) mixture gives u cheap low down power/torque... am i right or wrong...

nismoid..... not saying thats all u need...but its a good start....

and ...sorry i thought a stock rb26 in comparisson to an rb25 plenum is oversized...flows more air doenst it....oversized part for an rb25....thought compared 2 whatever stock part...if it's bigger..its classed as oversized? my bad....

not tryin 2 start shit bro..but ive done it...works good 4 me...like u might be on boost kwikr then me..but i might have twice the torque u do at the same rpm? :(

Yeah but the thing is dude i haven't spent a cent in those areas, and if you've spent into the 4 figure mark, who's infront? :D

N/A and Turbo are not the same. Bringing pressurisation into the equation changes the ball game.

I concur with Troy, we aren't running for that extra 200rpm of power @ a race meeting, so all the added expense at times really isn't justified

cool cool guys......i was only posting mycomments...coz i thought the thread was how 2 get more torque from rb25....that was just one procedure that was actually cheap 4 me tha t works helps my lil 33 2 breathe a bit more freely....got cheap parts from jap -parts w.a.... tune was more xpensive then parts....

ok thought the more different ideas we share...the more opyions we had...i was just sayin what ive paid 4 im not the mechanic...lol(i wish i was...)

ok sa weet...btw i do luv poncams....quite handy....

dunno why the guys doin my dyno only revved it 2 6000....on the dyno...have 2 ask them...lol....how much 4 a dyno Tune...over east?$$$$$ do they charge by result...or per hr?thanx

post-58752-1233142090_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, this is one of the most annoying things about nissan part numbers... I've got an unrelated example... Image is of the AT output shaft ~ they have the same part#, but clearly the shaft on the left is beefier design to that on the right ...the difference (essentially) is the 'lighter' shaft on the right, is for engines up to RB25DE (this includes RB20 variants) : the shaft on the left is for RB25/26DET(T)....are they interchangeable? Yes...but obviously one shaft is going to be stronger than the other...and, the lighter shaft is around USD115, but the heavier shaft closer to USD150...same part#... ...epc-data usually tells a tale ~ the amayama listing for 39100-23U60 has a note "Longest side is between 60 and 105 cm" ; no such info is there for 39100-23U70 ...and given the great disparity in price between the 2 parts, it makes me at least curious (to the point of caution) where the 'extra money' went? ...ie; these 2 parts have a cost difference that (to myself at least) isn't explained by 'plastic boot'...ie; with amayama there's AUD700 price difference ...plastic versus rubber?...I'm not seeing it like that...and 60cm ~ 105cm...??...that's a huge disparity....something hinky going on here... I'd try searching by VIN, not model... /2cents
    • I don't know for sure, but I'd expect them all to be interchangeable given the diff end and hub end don't move/change between any C34 series. Often Nissan will change part numbers and the aftermarket follows those year ranges; but the original part number change doesn't mean other parts won't fit. The change could be a change in material, internal parts or even just supplier. For example, all the RB gearbox to engine bolts are no longer available and there is a new part number instead. The only change is they went from cadmium plated bolts to zinc plated due to the issues manufacturing with Cadmium. They look different but work the same.
    • One year is a bit concerning. Did you try contacting GSP? It says 5 year warranty on the box if I remember correctly. I'm also running their driveshafts on my S2 Stagea.   You could check the part numbers on Amayama for your year. Here's the link for my 1998 which gives the 39100-23U60 part number. Well, that and 39100-23U70. https://www.amayama.com/en/genuine-catalogs/epc/nissan-japan/stagea/wgnc34/6649-rb25det/trans/391 What does it say for yours?
    • I ordered a GSP Front R/H Axle from here - https://justjap.com/products/gsp-premium-front-driveshaft-r-h-nissan-r32-r33-r34-skyline-gtr-stagea-4wd#description It lasted around a year before one of the boots blew out. I'm lowered, but I have GKTech roll center adjusters. One year seems a little premature. I think I'm going to spend the extra money on an OEM cv axle this time. This website - https://tfaspeed.com/collections/nissan-stagea-wgnc34-x-four-parts/products/nissan-stagea-awc34-260rs-rb26-right-front-axle-drive-assembly Makes it sound like the readily available OEM CV axle will only fit 11.1999 Stagea and up (mine is a 2.1997 S1). The JustJap listing didn't mention any years or anything for the GSP axle. Amayama shows '11.1999' and up as well for that part number. As well as 'plastic boot type'. See attached picture. So I guess my question is, does that axle (39100-23U60) really only fit S2 Stagea? It's the front driver side. If it does, I'd love to buy that instead of rolling the dice on another GSP. I've found that OEM one cheaper here: https://www.partsfornissans.com/oem-parts/nismo-jdm-r32-r33-r34-skyline-gtr-r32-gts4-right-front-axle-3910023u60 and here https://www.nissanparts.cc/oem-parts/nismo-shaft-ft-drive-3910023u60 Just a little confused because the JapSpeed listing for the GSP front driver axle doesn't mention any specific years or anything and it fit my S1 Stagea fine. So will 39100-23U60 fit my S1 Stagea even though technically it says '11.1999' and up? What would have changed? Thanks.  
    • Thanks for the info. The only "Issue" I've had with the shifter is I always found the throw between 4th and 6th gear too close. I'm always worried to shift into 4th accidently and sending my motor to the moon. Adam LZ recently came out with a video and stated Serialnine revised their shifters to correct this and will change all the revised parts for 150$. Strangely enough, I contacted Serialnine right after and they denied it and said it's bullshit. I found that strange as he's a distributer. I'll keep this forum post updated on that saga.
×
×
  • Create New...