Jump to content
SAU Community

Nissan Gtr Specv Debuts


craig V8 taffe
 Share

Recommended Posts

Mizuno-san said to us directly that the only market he will not sell the SpecV in is the US.

Whether it will actually come to Australia is another matter but Mizuno does want to sell it here and usually what he says goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

the US market is "not ready for a SpecV"

If that whinger on NAGTROC who shat his gearbox after 50+ full bore AWD launches is anything to go by, or the mentally retarded shit-talkers who think the gearbox is "weak" as a result, I don't think the US market is ready for the regular GT-R either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. There's a lot of background information i wont go into but the US market is "not ready for a SpecV". It's a personal choice basically.

Does Porsche sell the GT3 RS or Lambo the Gallardo Superleggera in the US?, if so, it's odd they are not ready for a car like the SpecV.

BTW, what do you make of the quote in the Nissan press release for the GT-R SpecV last week? they are saying there are no current plans for the SpecV. Sometimes manufacturers say they are investigating the possibility of the viability of a model in our local market. Your information seems to contradict nissan Australia....i hope yours is correct though. Porsche have sold plenty of Gt3 and lambo have sold a few Superleggera Gallardo here. A GT-RSpec V to outpefrom both for $250K would be great!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does Porsche sell the GT3 RS or Lambo the Gallardo Superleggera in the US?, if so, it's odd they are not ready for a car like the SpecV.

BTW, what do you make of the quote in the Nissan press release for the GT-R SpecV last week? they are saying there are no current plans for the SpecV. Sometimes manufacturers say they are investigating the possibility of the viability of a model in our local market. Your information seems to contradict nissan Australia....i hope yours is correct though. Porsche have sold plenty of Gt3 and lambo have sold a few Superleggera Gallardo here. A GT-RSpec V to outpefrom both for $250K would be great!

I guess it is a contradiction. Mizuno wants to do it but I guess utlimately Nissan Australia cannot be forced to sell it here.

I think maybe he just wanted to highlight how much he really doesn't want to sell it in the US.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't either :)

Some belated photos from the Nissan Ginza Gallery on Tuesday. We fail at taking photos.

P1130253.jpg

P1130262.jpg

P1130263.jpg

P1130266.jpg

P1130267.jpg

P1130268.jpg

P1130269.jpg

P1130270.jpg

P1130271.jpg

P1130272.jpg

P1130273.jpg

P1130275.jpg

P1130276.jpg

P1130288.jpg

P1130289.jpg

P1130290.jpg

And to prove we were there haha

P1130278.jpg

P1130274.jpg

Also took a trip to the Omori factory but were weren't allowed to see much. We made the mistake of asking how much the Nismo carbon seats optional for the GT-R were that they had on display...roughly AU$31,354.59 EACH. We laughed, as did the guys behind the counter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm the girl in the pic, unless Peter is a girl :wave: The guy is my partner Tomi.

Carwings is part of the navigation system. Also an emergency call for help thing. There's explanations in English on Youtube.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The great bucket seats - complete with little carbon covers for the ends of the seat rails.

post-5116-1232283009_thumb.jpg post-5116-1232283022_thumb.jpg

More carbon which should have been all the way through. The cloth covers overlap and looks worse in real life IMHO. Would have been better just all carbon or better still with a roll cage!

post-5116-1232283586_thumb.jpg post-5116-1232282996_thumb.jpg

Check out the fins which is part of the SpecV exhaust system.

post-5116-1232282981_thumb.jpg

post-5116-1232282962_thumb.jpg

Edited by N/A®
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess it is a contradiction. Mizuno wants to do it but I guess utlimately Nissan Australia cannot be forced to sell it here.

I think maybe he just wanted to highlight how much he really doesn't want to sell it in the US.

I guess only if there were 30-50 or so frim expressions of interest would Nissan Aus consider it. That said there are only a small handful of Porsche 911 GT3/GT3RS so it wouldn't be a volume car by any stretch of the imganiation. If it was $245K, but as quick as a Pagani Zonda R it may find buyers. From the pics posted on this forum it seems to reek of quality and precision, ceratinly at least as nice as a 911 carrera S, which is also about $240K mark here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Care of GTR-Blog but this really raises questions as to why you would bother!?

The Japanese press have finally got their hands on the production Nissan GT-R SpecV this week and they’re wasting no time in putting it through it’s paces on the circuit. Today we’ve learned that Best Motoring have had Tsukuba Circuit to themselves for the day as well as a SpecV GT-R. Put that together with tame racing driver Keiichi Tsuchiya and good weather and you’re set for an interesting afternoon.

Sources close to Best Motoring have given us the SpecV’s time and instead of keeping you all waiting like we love to do we’ll give it to you straight… 1:02.4.

Unfortunately this means it’s slower than both the 2009 and 2008 base GT-R at the same circuit in similar conditions. Here’s how the SpecV stacks up against the most recent base model GT-R taken from the current issue of Japanese mag Car Top:

MY08 GT-R (JDM - December 2007 delivery): 1:01.888

MY09 GT-R (JDM): 1:01.343

SpecV GT-R: 1:02.4

On a short circuit like Tsukuba the times should be close together but the SpecV should be in front, it should be 1:00 flat. So this begs the question: What’s the deal? We’re really hanging out for the April edition of Best Motoring DVD to find out more.

http://www.gtrblog.com/index.php/2009/02/2...t-laptim?blog=4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sure the weight savings and measures to improve handling are vital in any track car. I still cannot fathom Nissans choice to ignore power gains for improving the spec V. there are the usual few internet chat room warriors who believe they didn't want to upgrade the transmission but surely the standard transmission and engine would have handled moderate power/torque gains judging from the tuned cars already out there.

I hope there is more to this story for the spec V's sake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

if you ask me,

Just throwing a V-spec Badge on the GTR with a few minor tweaking and stuff doesnt even come close to what that original V-spec ment over the other/older model cars...

I think Nissan have let this V-spec model down, they should of atleast gave it Higher HP / More Features and Options / And maybe a more unqiue external styling... like i loved the wider arches?

meh.. personally its only worth the extra due to that not many will be sold because theres no 'Real 100% improvement over the normal GTR'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

in fairness, NONE of the previous V-Specs were "100% improvements over the base GTR" - no extra power (officially) no crazy exterior styling, etc, etc...

granted, previous V-Specs weren't twice the price either....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For anyone interested, the Way Back Machine has that Japanese website archived with pictures, etc: https://web.archive.org/web/20051023225805fw_/http://www.a31cefiro.com/air_con.htm "Simply swapping the wiring of the harness will not allow it to function properly. For the outdoor air sensor and sunlight sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN1-11 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. For the indoor air sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN2-3 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. The connector PIN numbers listed here are the genuine A31 PIN numbers. To avoid incorrect wiring, check with a tester before wiring. Also, disconnect the wiring in a location close to the sensor. The disconnected harness side wiring will not be used, so be sure to insulate it." Wish someone sold a conversion harness to just plug-and-play a Kouki 180sx digital climate control into C33/A31. I'm decent with wiring but feeling kinda lazy about taking this on.
    • Maybe SAUNSW could see howany members would do a motorkhana day if Schofield's is still available for a reasonable price...
    • Skip the concrete, we just need to smooth a field. Mark knows how to drive a grader Duncan   I reckon 100x100 flat area for skid pan style, and then some sort tracks for rally... Duncan's already got a rally car on the premises to...
    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
×
×
  • Create New...