Jump to content
SAU Community

Got Over 400kw Atw?

T04GTR

By T04GTR,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

sky30 Mentor

sky30

Posted
Posted

448kw @ 24.5psi on caltex eflex (E70)

Pump is at it's safe max limit

I rekon lines can flow more if I had more fuel flow

Are u going bigger/ extra pump?

How did you figure out the pump is at its limit, did you try more boost and didnt get enough fuel?

  • Replies 3.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

colinhunt
colinhunt

Let's not turn yet another thread into a discussion about your car, please.

Lithium
Lithium
SiR_RB
SiR_RB

Posted Images

bigmikespec Veteran

bigmikespec

Posted
Posted

Got over 400kw 418.8 atw turbo runs out off puff . 26/30

That was bound to happen considering it is a small turbo (especially hot side) for such a serious engine, same result with that other fella posting in the RB30 section.

danny14 Mentor

danny14

Posted
Posted

That was bound to happen considering it is a small turbo (especially hot side) for such a serious engine, same result with that other fella posting in the RB30 section.

Yes i was hopeing to squeeze a bit more but will have to upgrade rear housing And see what it goes, after i find out everything is ok with head and bottom end once i get oil samples back.

Nismo 3.2ish Grand Master

Nismo 3.2ish

Posted
Posted

That was bound to happen considering it is a small turbo (especially hot side) for such a serious engine, same result with that other fella posting in the RB30 section.

Who is the other fella and what turbo is he running , so we can compare ?

bigmikespec Veteran

bigmikespec

Posted
Posted (edited)

Who is the other fella and what turbo is he running , so we can compare ?

You, haha!

I don't think people should be surprised when they build a stroker engine/head combo, put a small exhaust side (turbocharger) on there and then the power noses over early... there will be more power earlier (more 'response') which is the intent of these builds but you just wont get that peak number.

http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/434910-rb3026-cam-selection/page-2

An elephant never forgets, lol

Edited by bigmikespec
  • Like 2
Nismo 3.2ish Grand Master

Nismo 3.2ish

Posted
Posted

You, haha!

I don't think people should be surprised when they build a stroker engine/head combo, put a small exhaust side (turbocharger) on there and then the power noses over early... there will be more power earlier (more 'response') which is the intent of these builds but you just wont get that peak number.

http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/434910-rb3026-cam-selection/page-2

An elephant never forgets, lol

HAHA why do you think I asked, I can cop it , I have been dumped on by experts :)

But you seem to forget, I did not do anything, I knew nothing and took the advice of the builder as far as the exhaust goes , he said put a new custom 3.5: exhaust on the car , I said OK I did not know he had a 3" dump and the old 3" Cat. I will fix that. Fark at that time I did not know what a dump was until you posted this :)

The PT6262 CEA will go over 700HP , this is much more than I have now or expected and yes it was built for response ,and as a stroker a little different than most .

I will struggle on, ducking the ton of shit raining down on poor little old me and hopefully end up with what I am after :)

Mitchee Proficient

Mitchee

Posted
Posted

The more I read about people's horror stories and being shafted by workshops or being underwhelmed by the outcomes of a build, the more I want to start building motors for people. It's not rocket science. In fact its almost common sense when it comes to choosing the correct components for the purpose or aim of your project. There is a huge wealth of information on this forum and I just don't understand how people can still be getting things so wrong.

  • Like 2
Nismo 3.2ish Grand Master

Nismo 3.2ish

Posted
Posted

The more I read about people's horror stories and being shafted by workshops or being underwhelmed by the outcomes of a build, the more I want to start building motors for people. It's not rocket science. In fact its almost common sense when it comes to choosing the correct components for the purpose or aim of your project. There is a huge wealth of information on this forum and I just don't understand how people can still be getting things so wrong.

Hi Mitch, I cannot believe the crap that was dumped on me and things being over priced ?

It is not all that bad and nothing like getting married , well for the 4th time :)

It seems we are all after different results. Mine is to be able to enjoy my ride and have a shit load of GO! from the getgo!

I love the look and history of the R3s GTRs , with the money I have spent I could have bought a newer GTR , but I wanted an R3, ended up with the R34GTR and just loved the feel of the car :)

With my drivetrain mods you should drive this around some twisty stuff, just great..

So , all good :)

danny14 Mentor

danny14

Posted
Posted

You, haha!

I don't think people should be surprised when they build a stroker engine/head combo, put a small exhaust side (turbocharger) on there and then the power noses over early... there will be more power earlier (more 'response') which is the intent of these builds but you just wont get that peak number.

http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/434910-rb3026-cam-selection/page-2

An elephant never forgets, lol

Very aggressive though might look for more numbers later for now after i sort a few things i will just enjoy the snap neck :)

sky30 Mentor

sky30

Posted
Posted

twin bosch 044s, standard lines. was leaning out a bit so have just upgraded injectors, if its still running out of fuel i may have to upgrade fuel lines. tonight i will know

Any updates from today?

How are your twin 044s set up? Feeding from surge tank or standard tank?

Nismo 3.2ish Grand Master

Nismo 3.2ish

Posted
Posted

That was bound to happen considering it is a small turbo (especially hot side) for such a serious engine, same result with that other fella posting in the RB30 section.

Hi Michael

Been reading some of your posts and you seem to know what you are talking about and I would like to get your input if you do not mind.

I did not choose the dump or cat, but I am going to change it to a 4" dump and cat. But think I will wait and see if the 3.5" exhaust system I have works in with the changes when I am getting the flex tune done ( hate the idea of tossing $2500 without seeing if it can work). If it is too restrictive I will change it to 4" all the way and finish the tune,

I am sure from what I have read 4" all the way would be better, but noisier. Mufflers could sort this out. Have to look into Mufflers now, never stops :)

The other fella :cheers:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GTSBoy
      RB20DET lean on cold start

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      You shouldn't need to massively fatten up the mixtures for cold conditions. For one thing - 0°C is not that cold. For another, the Haltech will be using the IAT sensor to tell it how dense the air air, and calculate the correct amount of fuelling. Then the cold start enrichment is added as a % on top of that, so it should scale with the main fuelling. You might also doubt the IAT sensor at this time. You're not using one from an RB26 are you? Using a nice Bosch sensor or similar? Happens. Some wideband units take great pleasure in killing their sensors. Put another wideband in the tailpipe and compare. Or just swap the sensor to a brand new one and see.
    • MidnightR32
      RB20DET lean on cold start

      By MidnightR32 · Posted

      Oh, my misunderstand. When the car was running, it sounded ok, but if I gave it any gas it wanted to die but caught itself afterwards. It's very different from how it was a couple months ago when it was warmer outside. The logs show that the AFRs are better during, what I assume, is warmup enrichment. Because it's cold, and air is more dense, should I work on the enrichment bit?
    • A31Skyline
      Rb20e and RB20DET parts

      By A31Skyline · Posted

      yess of course im not using 2nd hand parts from my spare engine, but the place where i live is hard to find parts for the RB20DET ,but for the RB20E is everywhere including new ones and a lot cheaper ,because for the RB20DET you have to order it overseas to get one and it cost a lot of money 3x the price to be exact. so i ask this topic because if i can use the new ones but for RB20E is it compatible or not. if not im screwed haha, not totally screwed but i have to save a lot of money first before i can begin repairing my engine, thanks for the information before.
    • MidnightR32
      RB20DET lean on cold start

      By MidnightR32 · Posted

      Unless my sensor just died, was only a couple months old, I strongly believe it didn't. How can I test it? I never mentioned it being 20:1+?
    • GTSBoy
      Rb20e and RB20DET parts

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Well, you wouldn't use 2nd hand bearings out of another engine anyway....so just buying the proper bearings is obviously what you're going to do. The crankshaft would be common. The conrods might be common. There is essentially nothing else you would be able to use.
×
×
  • Create New...