Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yep definatley. Watched it with my own eyes. Thats why i question it every time someone says more rwkw to awkw. Unless it was a freak run. Only tried it once

Could have had slight wheel spin in rwd mode, would explain the power gain going to awd

I think any variance is well within the accuracy of most dynos, 10kw when you are talking in the 400s is nothing.

Edited by Rolls
maybe, the car was tuned on the 2wd dyno and was let to cool before running in 4wd.

My R32 GTR

587awhp at 21psi (with 50/50 water/meth)

573awhp at 20psi (without meth)

2.6l - stock nur bottom end

270/270 10.8 procams

GT4088R .85ar

Meth is just there for cooling

Much lag?

Dyno sheet?

maybe, the car was tuned on the 2wd dyno and was let to cool before running in 4wd.

My R32 GTR

587awhp at 21psi (with 50/50 water/meth)

573awhp at 20psi (without meth)

2.6l - stock nur bottom end

270/270 10.8 procams

GT4088R .85ar

Meth is just there for cooling

I made that with a GT35r on an RB25 :huh:

The car had a lot more in it but we stopped at 21psi because of the stock nur bottom end. I'm working on getting a 2.8 for next year and might switch turbos.

I probably would have done a 35r but got the 40r as a complete kit. The 40r should be able to go 700whp if I do keep it.

I'm not at home right now but will try to upload the dyno sheet once I get home.

because everyone likes a happy customer.

Well put.

I'd rather have bad news but also be told a solution rather than a lie but everyone likes something different.

Anyway come on there HAS to be more with 400+ on sau! Post up!

Well put.

I'd rather have bad news but also be told a solution rather than a lie but everyone likes something different.

Anyway come on there HAS to be more with 400+ on sau! Post up!

all of this jiba jaba about rwkw & awkw hahaha - stevo, lets line em up?

hang on, your car ran on a different dyno to mine...where does it stop hahaha

all of this jiba jaba about rwkw & awkw hahaha - stevo, lets line em up?

hang on, your car ran on a different dyno to mine...where does it stop hahaha

Meh I couldn't care less about the awkw vs rwkw debate, drivability is what's most important IMO. We can run at WSID once Paul is back and the exhaust finished....maybe half throttle till half track then open them up, next run we just go all out and get booted

Power to me isn't everything, response is more important IMO than outright power. When I go to dash5's that will be an interesting comparison

I've tried to stop but like everyone says, "it never ends" haha

Still want to see your graph with 260 and 270 procams to see the difference

My money is on 260's to give the best result

my graph?

you cant beat the sound of lumpy big cams, it 'sounds' fast

I agree the sound is awesome, I've got that lump going quite nicely

Maybe I'm just too keen on finding "the perfect setup" but I'm fairly certain a smaller duration cam would move your curve to the left a fair bit

Anyway, it's not a cheap thing to find out unless you had no dyno or labour time to pay for

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No intention of driving the car the way it's set up now, just wanting to make sure I haven't made any mistakes along the way so that the tune can go smoothly, I don't want to waste anyone's time with stupid issues. And of course I intend to get it towed to the dyno in a completed state 😅 I have the base fuel pressure with the vacuum disconnected set at about 40psi, which I believe is at least relatively close to stock fuel pressure, maybe I'll have a fiddle with the reg and see what happens. For all I know I could be wasting my time with this and I should just plumb it in and see what the tuner reckons. I just find it a bit strange that it seems to be under so much load just free revving, but maybe that's just a result of the turbo slowing down the exhaust gasses and making a restriction in the flow, with no boost to compensate.
    • The boy just hit up google translate and it worked a treat, he said step one was "please urinate with precision and elegance", he then sent me the correct translation  I get some new loctite for the small fixtures tomorrow and get some "dort" going after that 🤣
    • Right, so is the fuel pressure the same as it was previously? If not, well, it's not going to work well. I can understand the theory I assume you are going for, which is: "Run it N/A, and if I have the original AFM, and same amount of fuel and intake air as previously, the fact there's a turbo in my exhaust should still make it run" Which it... might? Provided you don't actually change how much air or fuel is going into the car.. or getting out. But if you have changed that, all bets are off. What is the purpose to even have the car run this way? To get it to a tuner? And if the goal is to limp it to a tuner, you're still going to what - plumb up a whole intercooler system and new intake in the parking lot out front before your tune......?
    • Haha yea it's a bit of a weird setup at the moment, just wanted to make sure I sorted out any headaches before dyno day. At the moment I've changed the exhaust manifold, turbo and downpipe, 460lph fuel pump and rising rate reg as well as the previously mentioned headstuds and gasket. The nistune was already mapped for the car as it was and drove around for a few months no worries. The plan is to run flex fuel hence the big pump, which I've wired direct to the battery through a relay to avoid voltage issues.
    • Um. Was the ECU the same as the one previously there? I know R33's needed R32 GTST ECU's or other tomfoolery to run Nistune. This is such a wild setup. Most people would plumb in the turbo then not drive the car (i.e tow it to a tuner). What's actually changed since it last ran?
×
×
  • Create New...