Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Car seems to lose it's charge, over a couple of days, if I don't drive it everyday, (which I don't)...Jump start see's it going well.....charges nicely.....not exactly a great battery anyway, doesn't turn over real nice....jump starts are ace!

(no, I don't think it's the alt diode-packs!)..(checked 'car-off' current draw, it was negligible)).

Now...to try and find a battery....I believe that 400-420 CCA should do it.......problem is, all the batts I looked at today are 330 (in the same form factor) or have large posts....or are on the wrong side (pos left, neg right)

I have a massive battery in the Festiva...480 CCA!!!, might have a go at modding the posts on that!..(er..nahhh, maybe not)

I'll keep looking!...(um..with your help?)

ps...battery looks like the ridgey-didge one!!!..all script in Nipponese!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/251827-battery-form-factor-for-v35-coupe/
Share on other sites

Same case as mine. the batteries are basically shitting themselves out as you can imagine how long they've been sitting in the docks.

those that survived on cars that landed and complied is just a matter of time before the batteries died.

The closest one I found locally (although 1cm shorter - which means you'll need to adjust the bolt on the battery hold down bracket) is either Bosch BNS60LS or Century NS60LS (both are made in bosch anyway). This have the correct polarity position (positive on the right) with 2 types of terminals, big and small. The catch is on mine I have to cut away a corner of the positive terminal cover as the bigger terminal gets in the way. easily done with a cutting knife.

They cost about $90-ish from auto stores, can be $100+ depending if there's promotion or not.

I've got one lying around but it needs a charge. It's basically a brand new bosch BNS60LS but I left the dome light on 3 days and it flatted out and needed another charge, and I had to buy a new one as at that time the car (not rego'ed yet) was in the wrong position so a jump start cable cannot reach the battery position. and RACV refused to come to help me jump start it as they did not service unregistered car, damn. So I went to buy a new one as I ran out of time to get the car to Vicroads the next day.

The bosch battery been sitting in my garage since Feb or March last year. Almost a year old now with little or no charge in it and not being used at all, was only in the car for a few days. So I'm not sure if it can be revived again, and I'm not sure how much it cost in the shop to recharge a battery.

You can have it for $20 if you want to take the risk.

If it can be recharged again and come back to live (retain its charge), you'll save a lot.

It's 400CCA by the way. I think 300-ish CCA is more than enough as that's what I currently use (Century NS60LS)...

Same case as mine. the batteries are basically shitting themselves out as you can imagine how long they've been sitting in the docks.

those that survived on cars that landed and complied is just a matter of time before the batteries died.

The closest one I found locally (although 1cm shorter - which means you'll need to adjust the bolt on the battery hold down bracket) is either Bosch BNS60LS or Century NS60LS (both are made in bosch anyway). This have the correct polarity position (positive on the right) with 2 types of terminals, big and small. The catch is on mine I have to cut away a corner of the positive terminal cover as the bigger terminal gets in the way. easily done with a cutting knife.

They cost about $90-ish from auto stores, can be $100+ depending if there's promotion or not.

I've got one lying around but it needs a charge. It's basically a brand new bosch BNS60LS but I left the dome light on 3 days and it flatted out and needed another charge, and I had to buy a new one as at that time the car (not rego'ed yet) was in the wrong position so a jump start cable cannot reach the battery position. and RACV refused to come to help me jump start it as they did not service unregistered car, damn. So I went to buy a new one as I ran out of time to get the car to Vicroads the next day.

The bosch battery been sitting in my garage since Feb or March last year. Almost a year old now with little or no charge in it and not being used at all, was only in the car for a few days. So I'm not sure if it can be revived again, and I'm not sure how much it cost in the shop to recharge a battery.

You can have it for $20 if you want to take the risk.

If it can be recharged again and come back to live (retain its charge), you'll save a lot.

It's 400CCA by the way. I think 300-ish CCA is more than enough as that's what I currently use (Century NS60LS)...

thanx mate.....I found a batt at Repco (330cca, correct posts and position/dimensional size) for a hundgey and 35 bucks.

I found my old R33 batt (270 CCA) and I remember that doing just fine!.(it's dead now)..think I'll go with the Repco one.

thanx mate.....I found a batt at Repco (330cca, correct posts and position/dimensional size) for a hundgey and 35 bucks.

I found my old R33 batt (270 CCA) and I remember that doing just fine!.(it's dead now)..think I'll go with the Repco one.

hey mate I had exactly the same problem as you.

If I didnt drive my car for a week, the battery would lose its charge and I would have to charge it again. I tried to prolong this for a a few weeks but got bloody annoying.

So I went to super cheap, repco etc to buy a battery.....they only battery they had was 330cca which fitted our terminals and battery bay.

With all the elctornics our car has I wanted a higher CCA, so I went to Battery World and they gave me a 500CCA which fits our terminals and battery bay perfectly...cost 150, but for piece of mind it was worth it.

No problems ever since!

hey guys, just an update....was a little bit pissed off, but all good now.

Decided to hold off, just a day, to see if I couldn't find a better batt/price....(hey, I have the cash, but why give it to assholes?)

Went to Supercreep Auto, found the bog standard and recommended 270CCA NZ40L for the SkLine at $95.

I went back to Reepo, as I had found a 330CCA batt for $135 with the correct form factor, but that had been just sold.

Then thought about the 270CCA and how I sometimes have a coffee and watch DVD while in the car and in the garage, just for shits and giggles. Reepo were selling the EXACT same 270CCA batt (with 'their' sticker attached) for $115.

So, again, for shits and giggles, and as I was already there, I approached the 13 year old emo and asked if I could get the 270CCA for the same price as Supercreep Auto were selling theirs...and was told that they can't price match different batteries...I tried explaining (not in any serious manner) that the batts were identical, even the plastic welded factory numerical data markings were the same, just you had licked and slapped your Reepo sticker on it......(hey, I've been a great customer for Reepo since 1985, and was thinking, stupidly, that they would try and keep me(???)..I know emo would've not known that, but hey.

So anyways, drive further down Ferntree Gully Road, and my old haunt, 'Spares Gallore', and I popped in, still looks the same 25 years later, and still trying to sell that fan belt I saw hanging up all those years ago (you know what I mean)

and immediately saw the battery......'SUPACHARGE' (a well known brand) sealed cells, magic eye, correct form factor and posts and 380CCA!!.

"um...ehmuchisit?" I asked...old bloke said $99...I thought to myself...nah, but I won't say anything...guy checks his computer (an IBM AT286, I believe)..and it's $99!.....

(I did ask the guy how long the batt had been sitting around for, he said "not too long", the batt schtickers confirmed this)

Chucked it in the Line, and I've never heard the motor catch-on so quickly!!....Then I let it idle, charge up a little...and the next start is even more hornier!!

I'm off to watch 'Gold Member' in it now.....

Reepo! sux my left one!.....

Emo's, my right.

  • 2 months later...

can't you just upgrade the terminal into a larger size? I know that 350z have a Bigger battery compare to the V35. Notice that G35 in USA also have the same size as the 350z here. I don't know why the Japanese cars have such a small battery. Must be trying to be green now lol.

  • 8 months later...

Following up on this, for a V35 Sedan (2001, 300GT).

The stock Yuasa (factory original!?) battery was toast after a small...incident...yesterday when driving from Melbourne to Sydney. (Ran out of fuel 800m from the bowser, then forgot to turn off the headlights when pushing it around).

After browsing this, and other forums...

..and manufacturer/retailer sites....

..and calling companies that were mostly closed due to the public holiday....

...I got the NRMA Battery Service to come and with the NRMA member discount, had a new battery installed for $140.

Details:

NRMA 2384 "Premium"

CCA370

"RC55" (no idea what this marking means).

3 year warranty

10 minutes to install and test, and it starts like a demon now. Also found, in the battery compartment:

a 50 Yen coin

that the car has a dealer-fitted electrical "anti corrosion" system, which runs current through the body to ward off rust. (!!)

"RC55" (no idea what this marking means).

RC = Reserve Capacity (measured in Ampere Hours) ... what you really should be looking for when you want to run things off the battery only.

CCA isn't an indication of how long the battery will run with all your electronics in the car. That's an indication of how much current can be drawn from the battery by your starter motor (and other electronics on the ignition circuit). The higher the CCA, the crisper your starts will be until they can be no more crisper.

So in effect, if you get a battery with say a CCA of 600A and a RC of 40Ah, it's not going to be a better battery than say one with CCA of 500A and RC of 65Ah which will still give you the same crisp starts in your vehicle with an even greater reserve capacity for playing your DVD's for longer shits and giggles.

Edited by The Max

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah everyone always seems to refer to them as S13 wheels however they came on R32 Skyline, A31 Cefiro, C33 Laurel etc., and also came polished diamond cut or painted depending on the model. Congrats on your GTS purchase! I'd personally leave it NA.
    • In this thing about this 100% renewal energy stuff I hear no one really talking about anything other than power and fuel really Power and fuel, whilst being a huge part of how we use the billion year old Dinosaur juices, are only 2, of the probably thousands of things that we need to use it for in the chemicals industries for making nearly everything we use nowadays I'm all for a clean planet, but if we want to continue to have all the day to day appliances and stuff that we rely on everyday we will still need fossil fuels Whilst I do love science, and how it can bring innovation, there's really a limit to how far it can go in relation to "going green" As for EV's, unless your charging of your own solar panels, it isn't helping the environment when you consider the the batteries, the mining processes required,  the manufacturing process required, and how long a batteries (read: the vehicle) lasts long term If I was supreme dictator of the world, I would ban the use of sugar for fizzy drinks and food additives and use that for ethanol manufacturing, petrol engines would be happier, and people would be alot healthier  Disclaimer: Whiskey manufacturing would still be required, so says the supreme dictator of the world Same same for all the vegetable oils that get pumped into all our food, use that for bio diesel Disclaimer: the supreme dictator would still require olive oil to dip his bread in This would take some of heat off the use of the use of fossil fuels which are required for everything we use, unless you want to go back to pre 1800 for heat and power, or the early 1900's for plastics and every thing else that has come from cracking ethylene  Would I be a fair and just dictator, nope, and I would probably be assassinated within my first few months, but would my cunning plan work, maybe, for a while, maybe not Meh, in the end in an over opinionated mildly educated arsehole typing out my vomit on my mobile phone, which wouldn't be possible without fossil fuels And if your into conspiracies, we only need the fossil fuels to last until a meteor hits, or thermonuclear annihilation, that would definitely fix our need for fossil fuels for manufacturing and power issues for quite some time  Meh, time for this boomer to cook his lunch on his electric stove and then maybe go for a drive in my petrol car, for fun    
    • It really helps that light duty vehicles have absolutely appalling average efficiency due to poor average load. Like 25% average brake thermal efficiency when peak is somewhere around 38% these days. So even a 60% BTE stationary natural gas plant + transmission and charging losses still doing much better with an EV than conventional ICE. And that's before we get into renewables or "low carbon nonrenewable" nuclear which makes it a no-brainer, basically. In commercial aircraft or heavy duty diesel pulling some ridiculous amount of weight across a continent the numbers are much more difficult to make work. I honestly think in 5-10 years we will still be seeing something like the Achates opposed piston diesels in most semi trucks running on a blend of renewable/biodiesel. Applications where the energy density of diesel is just too critical to compromise. CARB is running trials of those engines right now to evaluate in real world drayage ops, probably because they're noticing that the numbers just don't work for electrification unless our plan is to make glorified electric trains with high voltage wires running along every major highway and only a token amount of battery to make it 30 miles or something like that after detaching. Transport emissions is not insignificant especially in the US, but yes there's a lot of industrial processes that also need to be decarbonized. I agree the scale of the problem is pretty insane but EDF managed to generate ~360 TWh from their nuclear reactors last year and this is with decades of underinvestment after the initial big push in the 70s and 80s. I don't think the frame of reference should be solar-limited. France is not exactly a big country either. Maybe it doesn't work everywhere, but it doesn't have to either. We just can't live off of fracking forever and expect things to be ok.
    • Yeah, all the crude is used for fuels and petrochem feedstocks (pesticides, many other chemicals, etc etc). But increasingly over the last few decades, much of the petrochem synthessis has started with methane because NG has been cheaper than oil, cleaner and easier and more consistent to work with, etc etc etc. So it's really had to say what the fraction either way is. Suffice to say - the direct fuels fraction is not insigificant. Heavy transport uses excruciatingly large amounts. Diesel is wasted in jet heaters in North American garages and workshops, thrown down drill holes in quarries, pissed all over the wall to provide electricity to certain outback communities, etc etc. Obviously road transport, and our pet project, recreational consumption camouflaged as road transport, is a smaller fraction of the total liquid HC consumption again. If you're talking aboust Aussie cars' contribution to the absolute total CO2 production of the country, then of course our share of the cubic mile of coal that is used for power generation, metallurgy, etc adds up to a big chunk. Then there is the consumption of timber. Did you know that the production of silicon metal, for example, is done in Australia by using hardwood? And f**king lots and lots and lots of hardwood at that. Until recently, it was f**king jarrah! There are many such sneaky contributors to CO2 production in industry and farming. NG is used in massive quantities in Australia, for power gen, for running huge water pumps (like, 1-2MW sized caterpillar V16 engines running flat out pumping water) for places like mine sites and minerals/metals refineries. And there are just a huge number of those sort of things going on quietly in the background. So NG use is a big fraction of total CO2 production here. I mean, shit, I personally design burners that are used in furnaces here in Oz that use multiple MW of gas all day every day. The largest such that I've done (not here in Oz) was rated to 150MW. One. Single. Gas burner. In a cement clinker kiln. There are thousands of such things out there in the world. There are double digits of them just here in Oz. (OK< just barely double digits now that a lot of them have shut - and they are all <100MW). But it's all the same to me. People in the car world (like this forum's users) would like to think that you only have to create an industrial capability to replace the fuel that they will be using in 10 years time, and imagine that everyone else will be driving EVs. And while the latter part of that is largely true, the liquid HC fuel industry as a whole is so much more massive than the bit used for cars, that there will be no commercial pressure to produce "renewable" "synthetic" fuels just for cars, when 100x that much would still be being burnt straight from the well. You have to replace it all, or you're not doing what is required. And then you get back to my massive numbers. People don't handle massive numbers at all well. Once you get past about 7 or 8 zeros, it becomes meaningless for most people.
    • @GTSBoy out of the cubic mile of crude oil we burn each year, I wonder how much of that is actually used for providing petrol and diesel.   From memory the figure for cars in Australia, is that they only add up to about 2 to 3% of our CO2 production. Which means something else here is burning a shit tonne of stuff to make CO2, and we're not really straight up burning oil everywhere, so our CO2 production is coming from elsewhere too.   Also we should totally just run thermal energy from deep in the ground. That way we can start to cool the inside of the planet and reverse global warming (PS, this last paragraph is a total piss take)
×
×
  • Create New...