Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

in the early stages of getting together a 26/30

theory is if i mod my 32, with things that i can use on a 30 as well

i know -10 will be fairly laggy on my stock 26 but i only want to buy it once...

im aiming for (in the 26/30) bout 500hp atw with as much torque as possible, building this sucker for the hills, with stock crank and forged rod and pistons.

question is by changing the exhaust manifold will i get alot more torque?? oh and is it as a rule of thumb, the higher to cp the higher the torque but the lower the max hp??

Edited by Dearlove
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/252127-10s/
Share on other sites

Ah great, another GTR being built for hills. The ONLY reason i still have mine is the fun it can be on the right hills :P

Ive done a lot (days and days worth) of thinking about what would be unbeatable up hill runs, here are my thoughts;

-Full built RB2630 with stock crank, mild ported head, no bigger than 270deg cams, 2860-7's,

-Full built RB2630 with stock crank, heavily ported head, 270deg huge lift cams, 2860-5's

-Full built RB2630 with stock crank, mild ported head, 260deg cams with huge lift, R34 N1's

Id imagine any of those would be uncatchable.

To answer your question though, i would suggest 2860-5's instead of the -10's. There's plenty of street GTR's (2.6L) using the -5's and seeing some pretty great results. Ive been in a couple with the -5's and they haul ass in a big way. Yes the -10's will give you higher numbers but the thing is, if you're going after 500hp at the treads just for mountain runs there's no point having unrequired lag on your way to 500hp.

Id be going;

-Mild head porting

-Tomei 260 10.8mm lift cams

-Tomei buckets

-Tomei springs

-Stock exhaust manifolds port matched and ceramic coated

-Tomei dumps ceramic coated

-Ceramic coated front pipes (whatever brand, just good flowing)

-Dash 5's

-9.0:1 CR or higher

plus all the usual shit :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/252127-10s/#findComment-4362306
Share on other sites

Here's a question i asked in the main Mod forum but there has been no response so i'll ask it here. Just substitute RB26/30 where you see RB26/GTR as i'm really more interested in how responsive they will be on a 26/30.

There is a turbo in the Garrett range between the -5 (GT2860R 62 Trim) and the -10 (GT2871R 52 Trim), that being the GT2871R 48 Trim. Garrett has rated it to 400HP (they rate the -10 to 460HP), i was wondering if anyone has ran one of these on a GTR as i can imagine they would be a lot more responsive than the -10 and would yield a lot more power that the -5. To run one of these though, you would have to get Garrett to modify a -5 compressor housing to fit if you want to retain the factory piping but they would be willing to do it and I wouldn't imaging it would cost much.

GT2871R 48T 400hp

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...1R_743347_1.htm

Vs'

GT2871R 52T-10 460hp each

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...R_707160_10.htm

I'm looking at building a RB26/30DETT at some stage in the not too distant future and i and seriously looking at running these on that as i imagine that the response of the 48Trim's on a 3 litre would be similar to that of a set of -5 on a 2.6 litre.

Edited by D_Stirls
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/252127-10s/#findComment-4362715
Share on other sites

ya links didnt work mate

thanks steve-o, yeah the hill runs are what these cars are about!!!

so -5 will see me to 500hp easily enough??? well thats got me sorted then.

so whats the best way to maximise the torque?? high cp and ported head??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/252127-10s/#findComment-4362782
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I agree, don't go trusting those trims. As I said, first step is to put the logger away, and do the basics in diagnosis.   I spend plenty of time with data loggers. I also spend plenty of time teaching "technicians" why they need to stop using their data loggers, and learn real diagnostics.   The amount of data logs I play with would probably blow most people away. I don't just use it to diagnose. I log raw CAN data too, as a nice chunk of my job is reverse engineering what automotive manufacturers are doing.
    • I'm aware, but unless you're actually seeing the voltage the ECU is seeing and you're able to verify the sensors are actually working I find it hard to just trust STFT/LTFT. I will say, logging the ECU comes naturally to me because it's one of the lowest effort methods of diagnosis and I do similar things in my day job all the time. Staring at 20+ charts looking for something that isn't quite right isn't for everyone. NDS1 allows you to log almost everything so that's normally what I do and then sort out the data later. 
    • Silly question, as I bet you've checked already, but the motor turns over by hand yes? I suspect Neil has a spare starter, though if not, I believe I have a spare R33 (or two) starter.
    • Yeah just run one of those posts to the Link like GTSBoy said. From google it looks like a "mishimoto boost controller" is a manual boost controller. Since you already have the link just buy any MAC valve and plumb it in where the mishimoto is now. Wires to the solenoid should come from the Link's / standard loom boost control wiring (I guess you have an r32, not sure if it is gtst or gtr, if it is GTR where is a 2 pin connector near the engine bay fuse box/injector resistor for that purpose, assuming the standard boost controller is gone)  
    • No. The ECU's hose is for a connetcion between the plenum (assuming single throttle body, not ITBs) and the ECU's internal MAP sensor. This is the primary load measurement of the ECU - so you need to get this one right. This has NOTHING to do with the boost contol. The wastegate also needs to see a boost signal - but it is actually far better for it NOT TO COME FROM THE PLENUM (again, assuming single TB, and not ITBs). This should come from the turbo's compressor housing (assuming there is a nipple on there, which there might well not be), or on the boost pipe somewhere between the turbo and the TB. On the pipe from the turbo to the intercooler is usually most convenient. The boost controller is then located between that boost source and the wastegate, ACCORDING TO THE CORRECT PLUMBING DRAWING FOR THAT BOOST CONTROLLER. There is no general diagram or instruction that will be correct for every case. Then the other ports on the plenum are for purposes such as Duncan described. If the boost controller has an internal MAP sensor, for a boost display, etc, then it will want to be hooked up there, alongside the ECU and the FPR.
×
×
  • Create New...