Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys - got a dedicated track car - its got forged rb25, oil cooled Master Power GT35R, oil cooler etc etc.

The cooling system comprises of a Greddy 52mm Radiator, 2 x 16" Thermos, Nismo Thermostat, vented bonnet.

Now after basically one hard lap of the track its sitting on 210deg F, after 4 or 5 laps, its on 260deg F - however it has never boiled on me yet. If i let it sit for like 1min after its on 260deg F, temps drop back down to 210deg F.

I am at a loss as to why it keeps cooking - if it was head gasket would it recover so quickly? I haven't compression tested it yet. My mate thinks its my gauge that is faulty - but its a brand new Stewart Warner with new sender etc - all wiring is secure and earthed properly.

I'm mid way through the AU Falcon thermo fitment - I'd like to return the clutch fan to the engine bay but my "whizbang fabricator" has run my I/C piping in a what that does not allow this.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/253478-rb25-r32-overheating/
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Means something is not set up right, tune/calibration related.  
    • Finally replaced the previous temporary mesh indicator surrounds (temporary was the last 10+ years 😂) with a 3D printed GTR style version for the front indicators. I think it looks a lot nicer than the old setup and at least the indicators now point in the correct direction rather than angled off. Needed a little bit of tweaking to deal with the intercooler piping but got there in the end. Old and new photos below. 
    • It's weird to me that you say this because I'm pretty sure locals with relatively standard standalone tunes (boost/barometric compensated alpha-N) still have driveability issues when they pop intercooler hoses. Maybe with enough data I can just train some kind of model that spits out an expected grams/cyl given every sensor input except MAF like what FCA did with their Pentastar 3.6 ECU logic. Basically stock everything. The main motivation honestly is to have a sensor that can be a decent baseline source of truth. In scenarios you're describing obviously it won't work every time but it seems to me the number of corner cases that exist in MAF load is maybe not as severe and difficult to manage vs ITB alpha-N with some MAP/barometric compensation.
    • What are your plans for your blow off valves? Purely plumb back? How soft will the spring in them be? AFM can be tricky to get super smooth and nice, especially depending on the rest of the system, and then can be very easily upset if something slightly changes. IE, even if you run recirc blow off valves, you could still see issues getting it to behave at certain load points as turbos might start to spool, but you release the throttle but it's not enough pressure to crack the bov open to recirc, and you can end up with reversion which can cause double metering, and hence dumping of fuel into the system, and stalling the engine.   If you're going to run a map sensor for closed loop boost control from the ECU, what makes you want to keep the AFM?    
    • It's not bad, it's just not flexible. And say if you have any leaks between the MAF and plenum, well then your load axis goes out the window. Here's a real world scenario, I blew off an intercooler hose last track day, as the clamp decided to Bluetooth itself somewhere. Still continued to do 2 laps and drive it to the pub for a couple of beers then home. Good luck doing that with a MAF setup 
×
×
  • Create New...