Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im looking at the next upgrade on the engine...

I have a stock gts25t with:

pod

10psi

racing clutch

3" cat back

im looking at the next upgrade...

things in my mind are:

turbo back exhaust

safc or new comp

fmic

My question to you guys are should I get a safc or a new comp?

i got quoted $1795 with $200 for tuning for a microtech, im still learning about my car so any advice would be welcome... thanks guys..

PS. im sure there was many posts like this but im new... :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25376-bang-for-buck-upgrades/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

fane - suss the forced induction performance section in the general board. this has some really good info...

general suggestions are to set a power target - as this will dictate what mods you do. a full ECU upgrade is better in the long run if you want big upgrades and big power, but that's not for everyone.

Putting a WA spin on it - a lot of people in the forced induction section write off the WOLF as an ecu, because there seems to be a shortage of capable wolf tuners in some parts of east AUS. However, there are a number of guys in WA who have had really good results with WOLFs...probably largely due to the fact that there is a guy in WA who is experienced at tuning them..

That's not an endorsement persae, just information to enable you to make an informed decision. there's a bulkload of info on here about the benefits and disadvantages of each ECU, so go looking and ye shall find(e).

The Wolf can loose the AFM also and has full PC tuning and a life time Australian warranty plus many extra inputs and outputs and air temp comp noto mention if customs get you ( ask Micko)

and the ECU can be upgraded in a few days so it stays current.

SAU members get discounts also.

The wolf has more features and is easier to tune though

can you give any more information here paul? cos alot of people i know who arent on the forum are having to make the wolf vs power fc decision, and its nice to know the facts on both ECUs before makin a $2,000 decision!

cheers

Adam, Sure there are alot of differences between the two, many of which have already been outlined.

MAP senor inbuilt

laptop software

more map sites than the PowerFC

airtemp compensation

inbuilt boost controller

able to control large injectors, unlike PowerFC

rotational idle, anti-lag

programable output's

extra inputs

able to switch between maps on the fly

Hope that outlines some of the reasons it's better.

fane,

If you've got flat spots in your rev range go the AFC :P I personally would go for a Hybrid Front Mount before an AFC next time.

I've got a stock dump pipe, and a 2.5" (restrictive, but "jap spec") cat and ran a pretty good time without an AFC :(

ie. My next mod will be a Front Mount :)

Paul, I'm running 700cc injectors with a PFC and I've heard of cars that run 1000cc injectors with it. Not sure what you consider large injectors but they are plenty big enough for anybody out there :P

They both have their pros and cons. Tuning for the PFC is now a lot easier and better with the Datalogit as Steve has said, and stuff like antilag isn't for street use anyway. Air temp correction is available using this too I believe. From everyone I've spoken to for street cars AFM's are better for driveability, MAP's are better for racing..

How many map sites do the wolf use?? PFC uses 20 x 20 AFAIK..

As others have said it's all about personal preference and depending on what your tuner likes may sway your decision...

You can get brand new PFC's for around the $1,400 mark now..

my 2c.

Brett

Brett, Ask N4SPD about running large injectors with the PowerFC:uh-huh:

Although the Datalogit does increase the functionality of the hand-controller it is still a more tedious process.

Wolf can run virtually any AFM aswell.

PowerFC's are good for GTR's but other than that there loosing the battle unless they decide to update there ECU.

I think if you polled the number of PFC users compared to Wolf users the stats would tell you otherwise.. :P

For mild to mid modded cars either one is more than capable, but once you start getting serious most people don't use either of these.

How good is the standard maps in the wolf? Is it as plug and play as the PFC???

Brett

And datalogit is only available for some PFC's. And not every tuner has access to datalogit, Wolf software is downloadable off the net.

Don't get me wrong, I think PFC's are great. But when you consider local warranty, price etc etc etc, Wolf comes out very very far in front.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Reasonably hard, although I haven't run it with the new Endless setup yet. The old brakes were F50's on 335mm rotors and the car did a 1:40.6 at Phillip Island which is a reasonable time, I'm seeing high 600s on the temperature paint. A guy I know ran the Endless fluid at WTAC without issues and he was doing 1:33's I think (Evo) with a 355/332 setup. I don't get out to the track as much as I'd like but we put the car on the hoist and spanner check every bolt and re-paint mark everything, bleed the brakes, change the fuel, check the coolant system and re-bleed blah blah blah before every event. Motorsport is expensive, RB's are expensive so a couple of hours before an event is time well spent. It's also a net time saving because if you can keep your RB from self destructing it saves you time in the long term!
    • Welcome Alice......hope you have a bit more luck from here on! What was done in the build?  
    • Hello! I'm new here, I have an R33 GTST that is currently being finished up! Last year was pretty rough, blew two stock turbos so I decided to build the car. Has been down since November, but I get it back next weekend!
    • Hello, I believe my car was imported to America in the 2000s by Kaizo Industries. Would anyone be able to help me find more info on them? I've only found all the basic stuff like that paul walker bnr34, them being shutdown by feds, just stuff like that. Any help would be much appreciated, thanks!
    • I am using Motec M150.  I am not working on the car myself actually.  My workshop is giving all these info, they are quite reputable in the industry and are very familiar with Motec and RBs and have done a few big setups with VCam and single turbo on RBs.  In fact, they built and tuned my engine from day one.  But they are stumped with my engine at the moment and cannot work out how come the compression is so low with the VCam. They told me that they have now swapped in some Kelford cams (without the VCam) and can achieve around 130psi compression and the low end torque is better, but now the engine is doughy as.  It boosts and peaks at more than 1000rpm slower, with twin HKS GTIII RS, it doesn't get full boost until over 5000rpm. I have always thought the VCam was a bit disappointing at the low rpm. To a point I had to ride the clutch a fair bit to get up a small hill from stand still.  That was when I had a clutch.  Now changing to a 8HP, I don't have that luxury and this problem has become a major issue. I am beginning to think the VCam never work since the day it was installed.  Maybe it was just sitting at the most advanced point, that is why it went good at top end but very ordinary at the bottom.  Therefore, with the help of the Holinger 6 speed and paddle shift, as long as it was moving, it drove pretty good.
×
×
  • Create New...