Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im looking at the next upgrade on the engine...

I have a stock gts25t with:

pod

10psi

racing clutch

3" cat back

im looking at the next upgrade...

things in my mind are:

turbo back exhaust

safc or new comp

fmic

My question to you guys are should I get a safc or a new comp?

i got quoted $1795 with $200 for tuning for a microtech, im still learning about my car so any advice would be welcome... thanks guys..

PS. im sure there was many posts like this but im new... :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/25376-bang-for-buck-upgrades/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

fane - suss the forced induction performance section in the general board. this has some really good info...

general suggestions are to set a power target - as this will dictate what mods you do. a full ECU upgrade is better in the long run if you want big upgrades and big power, but that's not for everyone.

Putting a WA spin on it - a lot of people in the forced induction section write off the WOLF as an ecu, because there seems to be a shortage of capable wolf tuners in some parts of east AUS. However, there are a number of guys in WA who have had really good results with WOLFs...probably largely due to the fact that there is a guy in WA who is experienced at tuning them..

That's not an endorsement persae, just information to enable you to make an informed decision. there's a bulkload of info on here about the benefits and disadvantages of each ECU, so go looking and ye shall find(e).

The Wolf can loose the AFM also and has full PC tuning and a life time Australian warranty plus many extra inputs and outputs and air temp comp noto mention if customs get you ( ask Micko)

and the ECU can be upgraded in a few days so it stays current.

SAU members get discounts also.

The wolf has more features and is easier to tune though

can you give any more information here paul? cos alot of people i know who arent on the forum are having to make the wolf vs power fc decision, and its nice to know the facts on both ECUs before makin a $2,000 decision!

cheers

Adam, Sure there are alot of differences between the two, many of which have already been outlined.

MAP senor inbuilt

laptop software

more map sites than the PowerFC

airtemp compensation

inbuilt boost controller

able to control large injectors, unlike PowerFC

rotational idle, anti-lag

programable output's

extra inputs

able to switch between maps on the fly

Hope that outlines some of the reasons it's better.

fane,

If you've got flat spots in your rev range go the AFC :P I personally would go for a Hybrid Front Mount before an AFC next time.

I've got a stock dump pipe, and a 2.5" (restrictive, but "jap spec") cat and ran a pretty good time without an AFC :(

ie. My next mod will be a Front Mount :)

Paul, I'm running 700cc injectors with a PFC and I've heard of cars that run 1000cc injectors with it. Not sure what you consider large injectors but they are plenty big enough for anybody out there :P

They both have their pros and cons. Tuning for the PFC is now a lot easier and better with the Datalogit as Steve has said, and stuff like antilag isn't for street use anyway. Air temp correction is available using this too I believe. From everyone I've spoken to for street cars AFM's are better for driveability, MAP's are better for racing..

How many map sites do the wolf use?? PFC uses 20 x 20 AFAIK..

As others have said it's all about personal preference and depending on what your tuner likes may sway your decision...

You can get brand new PFC's for around the $1,400 mark now..

my 2c.

Brett

Brett, Ask N4SPD about running large injectors with the PowerFC:uh-huh:

Although the Datalogit does increase the functionality of the hand-controller it is still a more tedious process.

Wolf can run virtually any AFM aswell.

PowerFC's are good for GTR's but other than that there loosing the battle unless they decide to update there ECU.

I think if you polled the number of PFC users compared to Wolf users the stats would tell you otherwise.. :P

For mild to mid modded cars either one is more than capable, but once you start getting serious most people don't use either of these.

How good is the standard maps in the wolf? Is it as plug and play as the PFC???

Brett

And datalogit is only available for some PFC's. And not every tuner has access to datalogit, Wolf software is downloadable off the net.

Don't get me wrong, I think PFC's are great. But when you consider local warranty, price etc etc etc, Wolf comes out very very far in front.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Appreciate the feedback. It is street car, but not a daily. Last week I got a quote from a good exhaust shop for a decat, one which is bolt-on, bolt-off to be easily replaceable. I got quoted for around €150. I usually do push the motor, but I wasn't in this case to make sure that no damage is done until I get the cat sorted. I think it's best to also ask the exhaust shop for the other option and see what they can do. If (big if) I were to decat though, would it be best to tune the car or would the stock ECU handle it? As far as I know, the stock ECU is not tunable and that would require additional purchases.
    • As above, definitely bash it or get it replaced with a high flow unit.
    • get some flares on them, or wider guards haha
    • Another question sorry, what stainless do u use in the turbo external WG plumb back piping? Is it 321, 316 or 304?
    • Right, its been a while for updating this car, but I made some small but important progress today. In the end I bought an Ecutek dongle from the Australian distributor Tunehouse (for local hardware support) but have gone with a remote tune from Racebox in the US (because they have done millions of these, and I could not find any tuner where I could access the tune anyway as they are all password locked). The App is reasonably easy to work with, but the PC software reminds me of Haltech's ECU Manager that you need to use with the Plat Pro ECUs, it is a nightmare.  Anyway, I sent the details over, got back a tune file and a request for data logs. I finally got a chance to access a private test track today as they want redline logs in 3rd and 4th, and have sent them back for the first round of reviews. The main difference in the tune is going from 1.0 (stock) to 1.3 bar (19psi), although I'm sure is a lot of other stuff in the background. Keeping in mind this is a dead stock car with 125,000klm, this is what the App's performance test claimed: Before After Interesting to note that both 400m tests had the same terminal speed (158klm/h) but different ETs. And no, the speed limiter seems to be higher than that at 186kl/h. Summary of the key logged parameters for the 3rd and 4th gear runs were: Those little turbos were certainly whizzing at 200,000rpm+.  Also I'm really not that excited about oil pressure 55psi at redline so I think I'll go thicker than 5w30 (nissan recommend 0w20....) and see if that improves it. Other than that (and the big boost spike....) everything looks good as a start to me.
×
×
  • Create New...