Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Scanners will fix it, its hard work and only do it if you have done lots of customisations that you really need to keep.

The first time you do it its going to take you *forever* to get the right mix of programs, and fresh installs are quick :D

Ye they can work, ive got mine setup on my PC and can work really well...

But for most people its generally gonna be faster to dump stuff to a external/spare hdd and just format up

If you spend more than 2-4hrs trying to fix something it generally would have been faster to format at

getting the pc back to where it was pre-format isnt too hard unless you have a zillion programs... and then, if you did have lots thats probably half the reason its running like a dog!

32 bit o/s addresses 4 gb of ram, including your video card memory.

I'd say your graphics card has 750mb...

64bit FTW

And yeah, +1 reformat/reinstall

yeh it addresses 4gb of ram, and my video card is only 512mb, which means the other 256 is allocated to other crap,

but i still stand that 32 bit vista is robing me of 750mb, i'm sure graphic cards use their own ram, and if it was 64 bit, it would use close to 4gb,

32 bit o/s addresses 4 gb of ram, including your video card memory.

I'd say your graphics card has 750mb...

64bit FTW

Forgot about that, I'm too used to servers where graphics cards are insignificant memory wise :P

Its an unfortunate limitation but 64bit support has been a little slow, I'd recommend trying it these days, as long as your running new software you will be fine.

Just run new versions of software, for example in really new versions of java they implemented pointer "compression" to reduce the 64bit overhead which eliminates one of the minor performance issues with going 64bit in java programs ;)

Its an unfortunate limitation but 64bit support has been a little slow, I'd recommend trying it these days, as long as your running new software you will be fine.

Just run new versions of software, for example in really new versions of java they implemented pointer "compression" to reduce the 64bit overhead which eliminates one of the minor performance issues with going 64bit in java programs :D

Only slow takeup in the windows world. 64 bit processing. Up to 32gb of RAM. And these machines are due for an update.

http://www.apple.com/au/macpro/specs.html

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi Apex and welcome! 
    • Probably too late to reply to this, but worth a try. It's not calliper flex, the calliper as a whole is moving so it has to be calliper mounting bracket flex.  Calliper mounting brackets are designed to stop the calliper rotating, they don't need to be designed heavy duty to stop the calliper moving in and out.  Whatever it is is not the major cause of poor pedal feel, the outer pistons are moving towards the disc rotor the same amount as the inner pistons are moving away from the disc rotor.  Hence no change in fluid usage, what extra fluid is needed to move the outer pistons is recovered from the inner pistons. For a calliper to move as a whole by far the most common reason is the rotor is not perfectly centred in the calliper.  The first thing I check is that hub face is perfectly clean, bare metal, where the rotor hats contacts it.  Then I check the that rotor is firmly held in place by at least 3 wheel nuts (or equivalent). If all of the above are confirmed to be in perfect alignment then I would check the piston sizes and ensure that the 3 inner pistons and 3 outer pistons have matching diameters (eg; 28/32/36mm).  I have seen a no name 4 spot calliper that had 1 of the 4 pistons a different diameter. Maybe I missed it, are both the callipers exhibiting the same problem? I would remove the transfer pipe and inspect it to make sure that there are no restrictions. Maybe you already have but if not I would return them with the video and have them confirm all of the above.   Hope that helps Cheers Gary    
    • If you have the original log book and it didn't have a chassis number quoted, then no money required.  I have "rechassied" a number of race cars, no problem as long as you have the original log book.   Cheers Gary
    • Well the good news is that it won't run any worse with an atmo bov than it does with no bov, I've owned a few Nissans over the years (r32, s15 and now r33), the stalling issue caused by a bov or no bov while still having an afm is easy enough to live with, most people get used to driving them and just feathering the throttle when you come to a stop to avoid it stalling. Changing to a proper ecu with a map sensor is ideal but in the short term I'd just slap in the bov if you really want the whoosh sound. I looked into the pass through type maf like the R35 one above but decided against it as the amount of oil and crap flowing through the hot side would mean you'd have to clean it often to keep it working.
×
×
  • Create New...