Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi there, hoping for some help, as our Local Nissan dealer is abit useless, we have an issue with the throttle position switch/sensor in our s2 auto. Within the space of 2 months the price of a genuine one from Nissan has risen from $170 to $420, now someone we've spoken to doesn't have a clue, the part number that Nissan have given us for the $420 one is 22620 AA509. I don't really care how much a new one is but it need to be fixed and want to make sure we are ordering the right thing before we part with $420. Is someone able to fast the part number for us just to double check please? VIN #WGNC34 Cheers, Sheridan

i think its sumthing in the gearbox.... call MV Automatics in adelaide at blackwood they can help you i rekn!....

also ut vin isnt wgnc34... thats just means stagea...

How do you get something in the gearbox from my original post??????

And sorry, full vin is 6U900WGNC34122977 (i'm a girl who is over her daily driver not being on the road...)

Thanks again for any help, Sheridan

Hey Chook thanks for that, have just sent you a pm with some details in it, but your'e too quick for me.... Just a little confused though, the part number listed is for post 08/98 as FAST said, but the date stamps on the pink plate just near the strut tower says 06/98, but then on the silver one on the firewall it had 2498, does anyone know it that means 24th week, as in June 98? Or am I just being padantic (sp?), and need to have a cup of concrete and harden the f$%k up???

Edited by skidkid
Hey Chook thanks for that, have just sent you a pm with some details in it, but your'e too quick for me.... Just a little confused though, the part number listed is for post 08/98 as FAST said, but the date stamps on the pink plate just near the strut tower says 06/98, but then on the silver one on the firewall it had 2498, does anyone know it that means 24th week, as in June 98? Or am I just being padantic (sp?), and need to have a cup of concrete and harden the f$%k up???

OK, mine also says 06/00, when in fact mine is 08/00, compliance shop must just estimate the month. Go with the FAST record, but make sure you let Nissan tell you the part # so you are covered if by some strange, unlikely reason it is wrong.

PS 2498 is the cc's

Ok, cool, thanks heaps for your help tonight, like I said earlier I'm just a girl (using her husbands profile, oopps...) who is sick of her car not being on the road, I'll go get that cup of concrete ready.... Let you know what turns up when we oder it... Thanks again, Sheridan

If you havnt ordered it yet, if you are 100% sure on the part number try streeter (i think he's on here?) i just got a part for my stagea, Nissan australia wanted $367 he got it from Nissan japan (he lives over there) for $310 deliverd.

www..jessestreeter.com

may be a bit cheaper.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is the other log file, if only we had exhaust manifold pressure - would understand what's going on a bit better   Can you take a screenshot of your wastegate setup in the Kebabtech?   Engine Functions --> Boost Control (looks like this):  
    • You just need a datalogger of some sort. A handheld oscilloscope could do it, because it will make the trace visible on screen, so you can look at the peak, or whatever you need to look at. And there are cheap USB voltage loggers available too. You could get a 2 channel one and press a button to feed voltage to the second channel at points that you want to check the sensor voltage, when you knew what the guage was saying, for example.
    • it's not the issue with making power, it's the issue with controlling boost, and this isn't the first time I've seen a 6Boost having issue with controlling boost down low.   The boost control here looks interesting.   Looking at your logs, looks like it's set to open loop boost control strategy (which is fine). We can see VCT being kept on till about 6600RPM (no issue with that). Ignition timing (I'm assuming this is E85, seems within reason too, nothing too low, causing hot EGTS and boost spiking). There's about 15 degrees of advance when your boost shoots up, however can't be this as the timing isn't single digits. I'm assuming there's no EMAP data, as I wasn't able to find it in the logs. We can see your tuner sets the WG DC to 0% after 4300RPM, trying to control boost.   My thoughts, what frequency is your wastegate set to?  AND why aren't you using both ports for better control?
    • While that sounds reasonable, this is definitely a boost control problem, but the real question is why are you having the boost control problem? Which is why I pondered the idea that there's a problem at ~4000rpm related to head flow. In that instance, you are not yet under boost control - it's still ramping up and the wastegate is yet to gain authority. So, I'm thinking that if the wastegate is not yet open enough to execute control, but the compressor has somehow managed ot make a lot of flow, and the intake side of the head doesn't flow as well as the exhaust side (more on that later), then presto, high MAP (read that as boost overshoot). I have a number of further thoughts. I use butterfly valves in industrial applications ALL THE TIME. They have a very non-linear flow curve. That is to say that there is a linear-ish region in the middle of their opening range, where a 1% change in opening will cause a reasonably similar change in flow rate, from one place to another. So, maybe between 30% open and 60% open, that 1% change in opening gives you a similar 2% change in flow. (That 2% is pulled out of my bum, and is 2% of the maximum flow capacity of the valve, not 2% of the flow that happens to be going through the valve at that moment). That means that at 30% open, a 1% change in opening will give you a larger relative flow increase (relative to the flow going through the valve right then) compared to the same increment in opening giving you the same increment in flow in outright flow units. But at 60% opening, that extra 2% of max flow is relatively less than 1/2 the increase at 30% opening. Does that make sense? It doesn't matter if it doesn't because it's not the main point anyway. Below and above the linear-ish range in the middle, the opening-flow curve becomes quite...curved. Here's a typical butterfy valve flow curve. Note that there is a very low slope at the bottom end, quite steep linear-ish slope in the middle, then it rolls off to a low slope at the top. This curve shows the "gain" that you get from a butterfly valve as a function of opening%. Note the massive spike in the curve at 30%. That's the point I was making above that could be hard to understand. So here's the point I'm trying to make. I don't know if a butterfly valve is actually a good candiate for a wastegate. A poppet valve of some sort has a very linear flow curve as a function of opening %. It can't be anyelse but linear. It moves linearly and the flow area increases linearly with opening %. I can't find a useful enough CV curve for a poppet valve that you could compare against the one I showed for the butterfly, but you can pretty much imagine that it will not have that lazy, slow increase in flow as it comes off the seat. It will start flowing straight away and increase flow very noticeably with every increase in opening%. So, in your application, you're coming up onto boost, the wastegate is closed. Boost ramps up quite quickly, because that's really what we want, and all of a sudden it is approaching target boost and the thing needs to open. So it starts opening, and ... bugger all flow. And it opens some more, and bugger all more flow. And all the while time is passing, boost is overshooting further, and then finally the WG opens to the point where the curve starts to slope upwards and it gains authority amd the overshoot is brought under control and goes away, but now the bloody thing is too open and it has to go back the other way and that's hy you get that bathtub curve in your boost plot. My position here is that the straight gate is perhaps not teh good idea it looks like. It might work fine in some cases, and it might struggle in others. Now, back to the head flow. I worry that the pissy little NA Neo inlet ports, coupled with the not-very-aggressive Neo turbo cam, mean that the inlet side is simply not matched to the slightly ported exhaust side coupled with somewhat longer duration cam. And that is not even beginning to address the possibility that the overlap/relative timing of those two mismatched cams might make that all the worse at around 4000rpm, and not be quite so bad at high rpm. I would be dropping in at least a 260 cam in the inlet, if not larger, see what happens. I'd also be thinking very hard about pulling the straight gate off, banging a normal gate on there and letting it vent to the wild, just as an experiment.
    • Not a problem at all Lithium, I appreciate your help regardless. I've pulled a small part of a log where the target pressure was 28psi and it spiked to 36.4psi. I've only just begun using Data Log Viewer so if I'm sending this in the wrong format let me know.
×
×
  • Create New...