Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Wow, this got confusing. So I searched garrett official website to get the measurements of a GT2860-9 and it turns out the GT2860-7 that GCG apparently have are the same measurements as listed GT2860-9 on the garrett website.. I don't know how that works but numbers shouldn't lie.. Right?

Edit:

The gcg -7 are the following:

Inductor- 47.2

Exductor- 60.1

That sounds like a -9 ?

Edited by hazjaz

Sorry guys, it wont let me edit the above post.

After a few more hours of reading through threads on this forum I have come to the realisation that the -7s are GT2860-7 (707160-7) and the -9s are GT2859R-9 (707160-9). Going off the stats on the Garrett website, the -7 is a bigger turbo? In that case why is the -9 the one with the better performance and able to push more power easier?

GT2860-7 (707160-7)

COMPRESSOR

Ind Whl Dia(mm) - 44.60

Exd Whl Dia(mm) - 60.10

Trim - 55

A/R - 0.42

TURBO

Whl Dia(mm) - 53.90

Trim - 62

A/R - 0.64

GT2859R-9 (707160-9)

COMPRESSOR

Ind Whl Dia(mm) - 44.50

Exd Whl Dia(mm) - 59.40

Trim - 56

A/R - 0.42

TURBO

Whl Dia(mm) -53.90

Trim - 62

A/R - 0.64

If anyone can clear this up for me that would be great, based on the read I have done -9 is the ones I want, but turns out they are actually smaller.. In which case -7 would have more potential?

Edited by hazjaz

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/423175-r34-gtr-turbo-upgrade-needing-advice/#entry6811557

I know this will seem like you are going around in circles but the information has been given to you in a user friendly way.

The flow potential of the -9 is higher than the -7.

It really is this simple;

After 'response' on a 2.6 = -9 (330 rwkw or so or squeeze 350 + on E85 on a 'normal' setup) *350 plus on 98

If you can put up with a lethargic result for more top end (360-380) on a 2.6 = -5's.

Stroker = -5's

3.0 with a bulldog curve = -5's

-10's/RS's = in the bin.

*Well setup cars are the exception.

Thanks for the reply guys. I will be going for the -9s. I'm sure if I quote the model number and ask for the HKS GTSS equivalent I will be getting the right ones.

-7s seem a bit out of a waste of time unless you're chasing a replacement

Edited by hazjaz

Sorry guys, no edit button again for the above post. But after reading about the different sizes listed by garrett I went into the technical drawings and they look identical apart from the turbo outlet. Is the design of this the advantage of the -9s? Picking up the turbos tomorrow so just want to make sure 100% that I am buying the right ones.

-7

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarrett/sites/default/files/default_images/turbogroup/drawing/Garrett_GT2860R_707160_7_new.pdf

-9

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarrett/sites/default/files/default_images/turbogroup/drawing/Garrett_GT2859R_707160_9_780371_1_new.pdf

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/423175-r34-gtr-turbo-upgrade-needing-advice/#entry6811557

I know this will seem like you are going around in circles but the information has been given to you in a user friendly way.

The flow potential of the -9 is higher than the -7.

That's right!

-7's and -9's have the same size in specs.

From memory when speaking to Racepace, the reason why the -9's have better top end is due to the configuration of the turbine blades.

Ones longer and the other shorter (the shorter blade allowing more air to flow through).

Also to do with the pitch angle of the turbine blades.

It's at a certain degree to allow more air.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The cam I am actually putting in (a few posts up) is actually smaller than my current one. At least duration/overlap wise. All the chop stuff I hear just sounds like an engine running badly, because it is. I then envision driving it around in 1st gear and being massively sad about it bucking to the beat of said chop. There is an idle video of someone with a similar cam floating around the internet, but mine is a custom cam (so is his) so it'll never be the same, plus the fact exhausts are entirely different. What I want to do is put some bullet mufflers/race mufflers in to replace a couple sections straight pipes that currently replace the two extra cats that I don't need. But this is even further down the line!
    • I can tell you now, when the bracket that the little hydraulic ram attaches to snaps, with a subframe, and V8 from an AMG C63 on it, it sounds like someone letting shotgun off right beside you. It leaves your ears ringing, and a huge thankfulness that you never ever put a body part under something heavy that's only supported by a hydraulic lift...
    • Still not a guarantee fix. I used a high quality butyl-mastiq (the black goo that's not really silicone nor polyurethane, same stuff they use from the factory that just spreads out like melty cheese), and I still get lots of water on both sides of the trunk when raining or washing the car. I also suspect the factory spoiler rubber gasket might not be sealing well, so I'm thinking of adding a thin layer of grey silicone around the bolt holes on both sides and see if that's where it also leaks from. The biggest issue is that these cars don't come with a drain hole on each side like other coupes and hatchbacks.
×
×
  • Create New...