Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys,

i just got a blitz canister mufflers,[$30] its 3inch inlet and 4inch outlet. if i just use the muffler and 2 and 1\4 size pipe from cat. would it work? would i lose power by sticking on that muffler to the standard pipping?

i got a cannon on right now but it to bloody loud. and to quiet if the silnicer is on and with it on it make that rattle noise at 2.5rpm

thanks guys

p.s... on the bottom of the muffler it got the jazma badge on it, if that helps

oh and it was also off a r33 but turbo

Edited by s1.533
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/254493-blitz-muffler/
Share on other sites

the rattle/rasp at the 3k range is common in N/A Skylines.

Replacing the mid muffler with straight pipe will make the exhaust louder.

Jasma approved means it meets the japanese standards.

If it's 3 Inch inlet, your local exhaust shop will need to downsize that pipe.

I really don't think you're going to notice much difference if any.

If you want to get the most out of your exhaust system, get them to make up a 2.5" catback system with the straight through rear muffler, and use a high flowing mid-muffler or resonator to keep it quiet.

Good luck getting rid of the noise at 3k revs though.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/254493-blitz-muffler/#findComment-4394412
Share on other sites

That cannon is doing you absolutely no favours in getting rid of the rasp.

Invest in a good brand name cat back and watch the rasp disappear.

I too had the rasp. Slapped on a 3" NISMO cat back.. and goneski

And in terms of your question. Nope. You will not loose power. But you wont gain anything either. I very much doubt you will see any change. Its only a very minor modification

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/254493-blitz-muffler/#findComment-4394448
Share on other sites

just recorded a short clip of my n.a reving.

trying to upload it on youtube but it bloody taking ages. im caps aswell

gonna try photobucket

any faster way to upload on to this site?

im still not happy with it tho.

been playing with my timing, giving it a little tap anti clockwise.

whenever i advance it, the rasp/rattle get more clearer and louder.but only when the engine is cold and it go for around 1 minute or 2.

when its on 15drgree its all good.

so when the timing is retarded it fine. meh as long as the timing is good and no sound im happy but could fix it better dont you think?

i think its the cam thing like everyone been saying.

should i just leave it? its all good on 15drgree. that the right timing yeah?

Edited by s1.533
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/254493-blitz-muffler/#findComment-4421767
Share on other sites

THAT SOUNDS FUGN TUFF!

My exhaust has copped so much damage (hole in headers, crushed resonator box and I think there may be another leak somewhere) what when it starts up it almost sounds like a straight through exhaust. Once the engine is warm it gets is RB rumble and just sounds awesome!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/254493-blitz-muffler/#findComment-4422170
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...