Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi my car was written of just before xmas and is now up for sale

its an r33 gtst series one. has had alot of money spent on it.

just too list a few items it has:

blitz intercooler

hks turbo timer

19s one damaged

after market exhaust

lowered springs

rebuilt turbo with garret bb

blitz blow off valve

hornet alarm

engine was in car less than 3 weeks before accident has new belts plugs water pump etc

exedy super heavy duty clutch

car was also resprayed 3 years ago

$$$$$$ spent

there is no damage to running gear but radiator is partially bent.

as u can see its only damage to left hand side of the car and not a scratch too the right hand side.

im after $5000 for the whole car any genuine interest sms me on 0430020090

regards bj

post-59598-1233640458_thumb.jpg

post-59598-1233640813_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/255384-for-sale-r33-gtst-series-1/
Share on other sites

im sure it will get moved.

if you sell it in parts ill take the plastic part around the inside lock in the boot ;)

btw sorry about the car :)

Edited by mcdee

Questions...

Turbo - It doesnt look like a rebuilt stocker, looks like a larger aftermarket item...?

Considering the turbo looks like its been rotated 45degrees (you can see the inlet from the side)... Is it even useable without damage?

Pics of it?

What about gearbox and so on?

Has the bell housing actually been checked for damage as ive seen accidents half that impact that have destroyed the bellhousing.

Pics to prove there is no hidden destruction?

Questions...

Turbo - It doesnt look like a rebuilt stocker, looks like a larger aftermarket item...?

Considering the turbo looks like its been rotated 45degrees (you can see the inlet from the side)... Is it even useable without damage?

Pics of it?

What about gearbox and so on?

Has the bell housing actually been checked for damage as ive seen accidents half that impact that have destroyed the bellhousing.

Pics to prove there is no hidden destruction?

As posted above Ash, looks like it's a huge air filter.

I would be surprised if the car couldn't be moved under it's own power, accident looks like one deep ass side swipe with something solid and stationary or maybe a moving truck; i wouldn't think drive train is effected at all.

hi i actually drove the car back to my cousins house 2km dwn the rd police followed but it does still go and wat u can c is wats left of the hks pod filter. the car does idle rough for a min but i think thats cos the ecu could be damaged from accident. but has no driving problems but car was written off by assesors. its a 5 speed manual as well.

The rough idle is probably due to a damaged AFM, or it's been knocked off the intake pipe.

This would make a good base for a N/A to turbo conversion; Engine, box, hubs, brakes, etc. Everything you need is still untouched.

GL with the sale :banana:

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have an Elite 2500, honestly most of this has been a lot of smaller tasks chasing little details and a whole lot of life getting in the way of bigger projects. I don't mind too much looking at a spectrograph vs having audio knock ears. 
    • Nah nah nah nah. Don't do it. It's not all about the full throttle power delivery. The main "street fun" and drivability gains from smaller rear (in this case) is how you will have boost available from a low rpm when yo just roll onto the throttle. Think jinking in and out of traffic, coming out of roundabouts, etc etc, where you just want to roll onto the throttle a little and have the spooly noise from ~2000rpm and a swell of torque. More of what you've already achieved by going to 2.5. And then, towards the tail end of 2025 you can pull the turbo 4 out and put in a V8 like we originally suggested. :P
    • Cheers for the info mate, I'm old too, 60 years old next May, so a more linear delivery of the 0.86 would be better as baking tyres and snapping heads isn't on the cards for me or the car I assume a more linear power delivery would be better for engine and drivetrain reliability as well, IRT the torque load at lower RPM???, as well as lower EGT's???, if my understanding of that is correct, have I got that right??? I've only got a really basic understanding of turbo sizing and all there characteristics  Cheers for the useful information 
    • What kind of power delivery are you after? If it's nice and linear, the 0.86 would be better. If you're after bake tyres and head snaps on boost the 0.64 would be fun. I'm boring and old, so linear power is preferred. Lately I've been watching videos on Z06 Corvettes and super charged Mustangs.... 
    • I’d go the smaller rear just because you’re staying on 98, if e85 I’d go the bigger one
×
×
  • Create New...