Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I had ACL bearings on my conrods and main bearings and it all shrank like an mm to 2mm from their actual size when

removed. Bearings can be taken off by just a slight touch instead of sliding them off with some force.

Practically the bearings were just floating.

What could be the cause of bearings shrinking?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/255632-rod-and-main-bearings-shrank/
Share on other sites

The actual cause is heat.

But yes, you are right, lack of oil pressure is the most likely cause for the bearing to be damaged, thus causing the heat when it's grinding away at the crank.

Who built the engine? Or do you not want to say?

I had ACL bearings on my conrods and main bearings and it all shrank like an mm to 2mm from their actual size when

removed. Bearings can be taken off by just a slight touch instead of sliding them off with some force.

Practically the bearings were just floating.

What could be the cause of bearings shrinking?

basically heat related, the shells are actually made to sqeeze into the tunnel from new . this is called the bearing crush. the shells have lost their crush from a few reasons, 1. detonation

2 lack of oil or starvation

3 clearance problem ,, caused from assembly ,machining etc etc.

if you post up a pic of the bearing surface i can tell you which is the cause..

Is that through the white metal or is it just the light??? How many Km's, normally bearings with copper showing are big mileage and/or abuse or a failed oil pump/no oil in motor.

If its through the white metal, you have a serious oil supply issue.

Pics

definately oil starvation guys. normal thing that happens is the top end fills with oil cant get back to the sump quick enough. do you have restrictors? do you have a drain from rear of head or a catch can with a drain back to the sump? check oil pump is not broken? what type of oil used? oil cooler?

Sory, its the camera flash.

Bearings ran close 3k mileage.

No restrictors. Problem is, i dont have a catch can.

Oil pump was JUN. Bought new. HKS oil cooler and Motul oils.

This is just crap!

I just wanna find out the cause of it. Least i know whats the problem now..

Sory, its the camera flash.

Bearings ran close 3k mileage.

No restrictors. Problem is, i dont have a catch can.

Oil pump was JUN. Bought new. HKS oil cooler and Motul oils.

This is just crap!

I just wanna find out the cause of it. Least i know whats the problem now..

High volume oil pump could be the problem. The stock engine already has problems draining oil from the top end, and the high volume pump just shoves more up there and drains the sump more quickly than the stocker.... ouchy

I am not sure but i would say that you have had some very fine dirt / grit in your engine either from assembly or ingressed from a oil change.

I am no expert but with a lack of oil pressure you have metal on metal which causes heat and a dis coloring of the copper surface. From these pictures i cant see any real heat discoloring on the bearing. What i see is a good shiney finish which could be from fine particals slowly polishing your bearings away.

What leave me wondering is the marks i can see on the bearing, again hard to tell but they look like dents and there is only one way these can be put into the inside of a bearing shell

Ok first of all, the oil starvation is the most likely cause but it still doesn't tell you why it failed.

The oil pump/restrictor/head return is a crock of shit. Nissan don't have issues with any of that shit. Yes, improvements can be made to the system but at 3k on a fresh engine, it's still a crock of shit.

The ONLY time oil control is an issue is if it's an RB26 without sump modifications AND it's on a race track at the time of failure.

3k old engine, so it's likely to be only just finished the run in. The fault can be anything from abuse during run in, to incorrect assembly.

And I don't see how any of you other engine builders can pretend to know the cause while only looking at one single BE cap. The picture quality is too poor and it's only one cap.

It doesn't matter how many pictures this guy puts up, without inspecting every single piece of the puzzle in detail, you are all just guessing.

Ok first of all, the oil starvation is the most likely cause but it still doesn't tell you why it failed.

The oil pump/restrictor/head return is a crock of shit. Nissan don't have issues with any of that shit. Yes, improvements can be made to the system but at 3k on a fresh engine, it's still a crock of shit.

The ONLY time oil control is an issue is if it's an RB26 without sump modifications AND it's on a race track at the time of failure.

3k old engine, so it's likely to be only just finished the run in. The fault can be anything from abuse during run in, to incorrect assembly.

And I don't see how any of you other engine builders can pretend to know the cause while only looking at one single BE cap. The picture quality is too poor and it's only one cap.

It doesn't matter how many pictures this guy puts up, without inspecting every single piece of the puzzle in detail, you are all just guessing.

hear hear...

Good post Dan, this is precisely why i dont post in these type of threads. Without knowing in extensive detail about every factor its just that a guessing game and doesn't help the OP. Take it to an engineer and get a full report with every engine part inspected. The oil control opinion you also have is something i firmly agree with, we are definately on the same page Dan.

Its like those "my cars running rough threads" when everything from AFM's, coil packs, to tail light bulb blown is mentioned.

Thanks for your input guys.

Will have all the bearings remove tomorrow and will take the crank for balancing. Will have the pics up by tomorrow.

Could it be the crank was moved or bent?

Anyway my specs are below.

Im using a RB26 crank (I think it was from a R34 cos the JUN oil pump fits without any collar issue) with a RB25 block

Wiseco RB26 pistons

GTR Rods

ACL Bearings

JUN Oil pump

HKS Oil cooler

RB25 cyl. head

Ran a good 388whp on dyno and few more runs on street before i felt this oil pressure problem.

Anyway, does a quad plate clutch have anything to do with the oil pressure problem?

I just want to know how and why the bearings failed.

Hope this thread will help others to gain experience and hope it wont happen to anyone of us here again.

Cheers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • First up, I wouldn't use PID straight up for boost control. There's also other control techniques that can be implemented. And as I said, and you keep missing the point. It's not the ONE thing, it's the wrapping it up together with everything else in the one system that starts to unravel the problem. It's why there are people who can work in a certain field as a generalist, IE a IT person, and then there are specialists. IE, an SQL database specialist. Sure the IT person can build and run a database, and it'll work, however theyll likely never be as good as a specialist.   So, as said, it's not as simple as you're thinking. And yes, there's a limit to the number of everything's in MCUs, and they run out far to freaking fast when you're designing a complex system, which means you have to make compromises. Add to that, you'll have a limited team working on it, so fixing / tweaking some features means some features are a higher priority than others. Add to that, someone might fix a problem around a certain unrelated feature, and that change due to other complexities in the system design, can now cause a new, unforseen bug in something else.   The whole thing is, as said, sometimes split systems can work as good, and if not better. Plus when there's no need to spend $4k on an all in one solution, to meet the needs of a $200 system, maybe don't just spout off things others have said / you've read. There's a lot of misinformation on the internet, including in translated service manuals, and data sheets. Going and doing, so that you know, is better than stating something you read. Stating something that has been read, is about as useful as an engineering graduate, as all they know is what they've read. And trust me, nearly every engineering graduate is useless in the real world. And add to that, if you don't know this stuff, and just have an opinion, maybe accept what people with experience are telling you as information, and don't keep reciting the exact same thing over and over in response.
    • How complicated is PID boost control? To me it really doesn't seem that difficult. I'm not disputing the core assertion (specialization can be better than general purpose solutions), I'm just saying we're 30+ years removed from the days when transistor budgets were in the thousands and we had to hem and haw about whether there's enough ECC DRAM or enough clock cycles or the interrupt handler can respond fast enough to handle another task. I really struggle to see how a Greddy Profec or an HKS EVC7 or whatever else is somehow a far superior solution to what you get in a Haltech Nexus/Elite ECU. I don't see OEMs spending time on dedicated boost control modules in any car I've ever touched. Is there value to separating out a motor controller or engine controller vs an infotainment module? Of course, those are two completely different tasks with highly divergent requirements. The reason why I cite data sheets, service manuals, etc is because as you have clearly suggested I don't know what I'm doing, can't learn how to do anything correctly, and have never actually done anything myself. So when I do offer advice to people I like to use sources that are not just based off of taking my word for it and can be independently verified by others so it's not just my misinterpretation of a primary source.
    • That's awesome, well done! Love all these older Datsun / Nissans so rare now
    • As I said, there's trade offs to jamming EVERYTHING in. Timing, resources etc, being the huge ones. Calling out the factory ECU has nothing to do with it, as it doesn't do any form of fancy boost control. It's all open loop boost control. You mention the Haltech Nexus, that's effectively two separate devices jammed into one box. What you quote about it, is proof for that. So now you've lost flexibility as a product too...   A product designed to do one thing really well, will always beat other products doing multiple things. Also, I wouldn't knock COTS stuff, you'd be surprised how many things are using it, that you're probably totally in love with As for the SpaceX comment that we're working directly with them, it's about the type of stuff we're doing. We're doing design work, and breaking world firsts. If you can't understand that I have real world hands on experience, including in very modern tech, and actually understand this stuff, then to avoid useless debates where you just won't accept fact and experience, from here on, it seems you'd be be happy I (and possibly anyone with knowledge really) not reply to your questions, or input, no matter how much help you could be given to help you, or let you learn. It seems you're happy reading your data sheets, factory service manuals, and only want people to reinforce your thoughts and points of view. 
    • I don't really understand because clearly it's possible. The factory ECU is running on like a 4 MHz 16-bit processor. Modern GDI ECUs have like 200 MHz superscalar cores with floating point units too. The Haltech Nexus has two 240 MHz CPU cores. The Elite 2500 is a single 80 MHz core. Surely 20x the compute means adding some PID boost control logic isn't that complicated. I'm not saying clock speed is everything, but the requirements to add boost control to a port injection 6 cylinder ECU are really not that difficult. More I/O, more interrupt handlers, more working memory, etc isn't that crazy to figure out. SpaceX if anything shows just how far you can get arguably doing things the "wrong" way, ie x86 COTS running C++ on Linux. That is about as far away from the "correct" architecture as it gets for a real time system, but it works anyways. 
×
×
  • Create New...