Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thanks alot roman.

i would recommend anyone who has modifications on their car to print this out and keep a spare copy in the car, and get very familar with it.

p.s i would recommend SAU do something like sticky these sort of important documents.

i also wanted to raise a important question about the document.

this was taken from section 8 in regards to wheel sizes.

88655027sj6.th.jpg

it states that wheels are determined illegal is they are above 25mm from the wheel spesified on the car OR car series.

what does vicroads clasify as series?

Series of the Actual car (eg R34 GTR or GTT or GT)

or

Skyline series? (R32 R33 R34) would that include the new R35 then?

if so R32s (which came with 15s) could have wheels as big as 20x10 and be legal?

Personally i always thought of it as

Brand = Nissan

Make = Skyline

Series = R32/R33/R34/R35

Model = GTR/GTT/GTST/GT

discuss

Edited by VB-

think about WHY they have these rules and that should help you find an answer. vicroads' rationale is for cars to remain safe and roadworthy by not allowing monster wheels to be put on tiny cars, whose chassis/suspension etc wouldn't be able to handle it properly.

how similar is an r32 to an r35? chalk and cheese, but for the GTR label. i doubt very much you'd get away with it on that basis.

i go by the tyre placard, ie. 25mm wider than the widest rim on there.

think about WHY they have these rules and that should help you find an answer. vicroads' rationale is for cars to remain safe and roadworthy by not allowing monster wheels to be put on tiny cars, whose chassis/suspension etc wouldn't be able to handle it properly.

how similar is an r32 to an r35? chalk and cheese, but for the GTR label. i doubt very much you'd get away with it on that basis.

i go by the tyre placard, ie. 25mm wider than the widest rim on there.

your point about a r32 compared to a r35 is taken is but i think your failing to see the point here.

bigger wheels half the time are used to help handle better. its half the reason why you see monster GTRs with something like 18x11 wheels despite then having no where near that big from factory. wether your using drag applications or track, sometimes you jsut gotta go bigger.

i would like bigger wheels on my car and would like knowing its legal........thats all

Edited by VB-
i also wanted to raise a important question about the document.

this was taken from section 8 in regards to wheel sizes.

88655027sj6.th.jpg

it states that wheels are determined illegal is they are above 25mm from the wheel spesified on the car OR car series.

what does vicroads clasify as series?

Series of the Actual car (eg R34 GTR or GTT or GT)

or

Skyline series? (R32 R33 R34) would that include the new R35 then?

if so R32s (which came with 15s) could have wheels as big as 20x10 and be legal?

Personally i always thought of it as

Brand = Nissan

Make = Skyline

Series = R32/R33/R34/R35

Model = GTR/GTT/GTST/GT

discuss

Always thought it was,

Make: Nissan

Model: Skyline

Series: R32/33/34

In the VicRoads documents, I've always translated the 'widest for that vehicle series' as in the widest that series has got. For example the R32 GTSt's only got 15x6.5" wheels where as the GTR's got the 15x8". The 15x8 was the widest from that series (R32) so you could legally go up to 9" wide (both on the GTSt and GTR) and whatever diameter as long as it's 15mm within factory rolling diameter (total, both tyre and wheel).

No idea if that's correct or made sense, but I always thought it was like that. :laugh:

Edited by adam-__-
thanks alot roman.

i would recommend anyone who has modifications on their car to print this out and keep a spare copy in the car, and get very familar with it.

p.s i would recommend SAU do something like sticky these sort of important documents.

Umm there is one... :laugh:

Its called the EPA/RWC thread in this very section thats been there since Feb 2007.

As for the actual VicRoads VSI documents, there is no point uploading them.

You should always download from the website if wanting to view them incase there are ammendments and so on.

So uploading the to the forum itself would not be beneficial on the chance it proves old/outdated information

Don't quote me as I'm not certain, but back in my FordForums days, I remember everyone saying that they could run XX size and diameter wheels on their base model Falcons etc due to the XR's in that series having XX size wheels.

I think it goes off the largest available factory option for that series. So for example a BF Typhoon came with 18's, but optional 19's therefore you could get away with 21's if the rest of the dimensions were within the guidelines...

As far as translating that to Skylines, it's only really the 34 that has anything 2" bigger from GT-R to GT-T, with 33 GTR's only being 1" bigger than GTS-T's, but that'd still allow 33's to run 19's as long as the widths and tyre sizes were within the guidelines...

Think there's also another rule of any wheel/tire upgrade having to be within 15mm of the largest/smallest factory option wheel/tire package for that car...(included smallest as you can't run 13's on a car that should have 17's etc)

theoretically you were to go on the bases that 15mm was the largest/smallest size package, you could essentially have 25" wheels so long as the tyre is small enough to compensate for the 15mm no?

I think there's more than the 1 rule as far as wheels go...So you might be within the 15mm rule but outside the other ruling as far as wheel size goes...From memory its 2" up/down on the largest/smallest factory option

wat i would like to know is what vicroads clasify as series.

if indeed they look apon series like like dezz said. base model falcons being compared to high end XR6s, it should apply with skylines aswell.

the new R35 sports 20 x 9.5" (front) and 20 x 10.5" (rear) .

which would hopefully mean i can run my 19x11s on my car :laugh:

wat i would like to know is what vicroads clasify as series.

if indeed they look apon series like like dezz said. base model falcons being compared to high end XR6s, it should apply with skylines aswell.

the new R35 sports 20 x 9.5" (front) and 20 x 10.5" (rear) .

which would hopefully mean i can run my 19x11s on my car :laugh:

i think what dezz meant was that you could run the width out of your serries, so if you have an R33, you have to keep to the max width that was available, so that would mean R33 GTR size wheels, plus that 15mm rule

It's all in plain English..

Falcon, say a Ba...regardless of spec it's still a BA series falcon. So if the largest diameter rim is 19 x 35 x 235 from the factory you may go 15mm oversize in rolling diameter and up to 25mm in width.

Skyline, r3- series whatever....blah blah, same deal, regardless gtr,gtst,gts ect you can go 15mm taller in rolling diameter and 25mm wider over factory spec

wat i would like to know is what vicroads clasify as series.

if indeed they look apon series like like dezz said. base model falcons being compared to high end XR6s, it should apply with skylines aswell.

the new R35 sports 20 x 9.5" (front) and 20 x 10.5" (rear) .

which would hopefully mean i can run my 19x11s on my car :laugh:

i think what dezz meant was that you could run the width out of your serries, so if you have an R33, you have to keep to the max width that was available, so that would mean R33 GTR size wheels, plus that 15mm rule

Yep, thats what I meant. Not that you can go off what the R35 has....

So basically all GTS-T owners would go off GTR specs as they're going to allow you to run the largest wheels

As for fords, EF-EL would go off EF-EL XR's, AU off AU (series 1, 2 and 3) XR's and so on

your point about a r32 compared to a r35 is taken is but i think your failing to see the point here.

bigger wheels half the time are used to help handle better. its half the reason why you see monster GTRs with something like 18x11 wheels despite then having no where near that big from factory. wether your using drag applications or track, sometimes you jsut gotta go bigger.

i would like bigger wheels on my car and would like knowing its legal........thats all

yes wider wheels can give you more traction, but what ric is trying to say is that cars are designed with those wheels in mind... so certain suspension components are also engineered to work in with the standard wheels.. and a large change from standard specifications can have adverse affects, such as the wheel bearings.. if you go too wide with a very drastic offset, you'll start to load the wheel bearing beyong thier engineered tolerances! so the limitations imposed by vicroads and adr, are not there to stop you having fun with which wheels you want to put on your car, but as a safety guideline.

^^ or even snap wheel studs and so on if the car is too low and rims dont sit right etc.

There is a can of worms so to speak about all the possible dangers... ye you might not be bad yourself, but this is the majority of society and some of the stuff you see on the roads is a clear reason why these laws are there as they are just dangerous

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...