Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The primary need is to atomise the water as fine as possible, and I use the Spraying systems nozzle as identified in the autospeed article for both applications. I have the intake spray after the intercooler in the line where the air velocity is higher so there is less chance the water might settle out to pool. Before the IC it could settle out as the velocities reduce, much like an oil catch can or dry sump, although I doubt it with the heat. It is on a rising pipe as well so any overspraying or activation when the engine is not running will have the water run down to the intercooler. Just worried about hydrostatic lock. It is really a worthy upgrade.

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

What water does is raise the detonation threshold.

To understand what this is, you need to understand detonation. What happens with detonation is that the trapped mixture is ignited by the spark and begins to burn in the area immediately around the plug. This burning causes the (mostly)nitrogen in the air to expand from the heat and increase the chamber pressure.

Now the burning continues until all the mixture is burned and pressure and temperature reach a maximum, usually at about 20 degrees ATDC. The ignition timing is early enough to always get the maximum at around 20 degrees ATDC.

What can happen though, is that the pressure and temperature in the chamber can get high enough to cause not burning but a spontaneous EXPLOSION. The whole lot detonates like a bomb creating a huge shock wave that breaks things.

So it is temperature and pressure that causes detonation. So you must lower the temperature and pressure reached DURING ACTUAL COMBUSTION(or use a less detonation prone fuel).

One way is to inject water. It does not have to be fully vaporised before it reaches the engine. Even a solid jet of water is going to flash into steam either during the compression stroke, or actual combustion. It is the high latent heat of water that lowers the peak combustion temperature and reduces detonation.

Another interesting feature is that the steam expands along with the nitrogen in the air to act as the working fluid that pushes down the piston. So although peak temperatures are much reduced, the pressures are not, and you lose no power by adding water, in fact you gain a bit.

A lot of people do not realise that it is the nitrogen in the air that does not burn which actually pushes the piston down. And steam works even better.

The reason I suggested fuel injectors is because they can meter in precise small quantities into every cylinder, and the fine spray is going to assist vaporisation.

Spraying water into the turbo inlet also works, but like fuel distribution, you have no way of knowing if that water is going to find its way into all cylinders in equal quantity. It will if it is fully vaporised, but it may not be.

Warpspeed

I like your explanation, saved me from digging through my archives although I would suggest that the nitrogen is not the only working fluid, even though it takes up some 70% of the atmosphere. This was the reason for oxygen injecting the Lynx 1.8 with stock exhaust and pod filter to achieve low 7 second 0-100 times. Also used an extra injector and water injection off a throttle switch to activate it all and activated it at over 3000rpm for a huge push from the little machine.

Anyway, have to go look for some new pistons. Time to go to that forged piston thread after the bearings went west and scored #3 big end journal and cracked 2 pistons prior to the water injection.

Yes you are right. The other gasses and fuel do not just disappear, but the nitrogen working fluid is something that fascinated me when I first learned of it.

It is also why nitrous oxide works so well, it is mostly nitrogen (N2O). I believe pure oxygen will increase combustion temperatures and can lead you up the dreaded detonation path, so be careful.

One way is to inject water. It does not have to be fully vaporised before it reaches the engine. Even a solid jet of water is going to flash into steam either during the compression stroke, or actual combustion. It is the high latent heat of water that lowers the peak combustion temperature and reduces detonation.

Yes, everything you said is true, but I still stand by my claim that injecting the water further up the intake piping will give it more time to effect it's intake charge temperature drop, rather than an instantaneous conversion from liquid -> gas if you were to squirt it down the runners.

Also atomised water will absorb a lot more heat than a "solid jet of water", as it has a lot more surface area. Using fuel injectors will not achieve this at all.

You are right, early complete vaporisation WILL remove heat from the intake charge, and lower induction temperatures. No argument there. Also lower charge temperatures mean more density, and this is extremely important for power production. So I agree.

But reducing detonation is a completely different thing to producing power. Detonation is only due to the peak temperature and pressure reached during actual combustion. Provided a certain mass of water is totally turned to vapor (boiled) the specific heat will reduce the final combustion temperature, and combustion will remain controlled.

So purely from detonation point of view it does not really matter where the water is introduced, or where along the chain of events it all finally boils off. During combustion it most certainly will all boil because the temperatures are so high.

Once again you are getting to the crux of the discussion. The cooler air is good, but the volume of water to cool the air is a tradeoff that sees no benefit from the cooler, denser charge. It is the detonation suppression that is the real benefit in introducing water to the cylinders.

I agree with Warpspeed, I think the water would flash into steam due to the heat.

Hydrolic lock is the big fear, thats why you have a safety solonoid valve in the system that stops the engine drawing water down the tube when not in boost cycle. Also stops dribbling etc.

I'm going down the path of an individual fogging nozzle in each runner with a computer controlled pump (inputs: RPM, Boost, Water Pressure).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...